Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sara Morrison vs Belfast Film Festival - Thread 2

1000 replies

TwoLoonsAndASprout · 14/11/2025 13:42

Continuation of previous thread - don’t have all the details to hand to add here, so if someone can pop them on, pls do! Want to get this up quickly!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
54
borntobequiet · 15/11/2025 18:44

Justabaker · 15/11/2025 18:19

Companies House have recently instituted mandatory verification of directors.

I've been a director of more than one listed company, a licensed profession, held a UK driving license, have a passport, lived at the same address for 18 years and I failed. Had to go get verified in person.

As the kids say - that shit got real. Recently.

I suppose I should be pleased that though annoying and fiddly, it worked OK for me. As my directorship involves a lot of time consuming, unpaid work, I’m at least grateful for that.

GrumpyUngulate · 15/11/2025 18:47

This may be a misread of social media, I am far from expert in it's ways. But 'Professor' Boyd is said to live in Armagh, and to have a 22yr old daughter named Zoe. There is a Zoe Boyd of that approximate age operating beauty salons in Armagh/Portadown. That same Zoe Boyd appears to be in a relationship with a somewhat gender-fluid female called Frankie Byrne.

https://www.facebook.com/zoe.boyd.71/posts/pfbid0YrdNKX7sXdKpSwKzHHsEqMo5AZoaoY4hV2AMU6k4QnD3uuJEjqaLhNFboGsVozQ3l

https://www.facebook.com/zoe.boyd.71/posts/pfbid0ZW5zd2zZxcUEGsgUkyLSNScE21vmnYySVRknSgegJjaHVXsBKwjtmsSVsvWfoDpyl

This is highly speculative and must not be taken as fact, but if that's the same Zoe Boyd it's quite possible that her mother would have firm views on trans rights etc.

Zoe Boyd

Food and wine tasting on a farm at the foot of mt Vesuvius 🌋🍷

https://www.facebook.com/zoe.boyd.71/posts/pfbid0ZW5zd2zZxcUEGsgUkyLSNScE21vmnYySVRknSgegJjaHVXsBKwjtmsSVsvWfoDpyl

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 18:53

I think that Helen Joyce (as ever) is confirmed with every single one of these cases.

Look at Jolyon too.

Anwiredd · 15/11/2025 18:55

It looks as if she's been writing reports on waste management in Northern Ireland for UK Government. Was due diligence done?

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 18:55

Was reading through the details of yesterday again. I thought NC point about what bias is in this context was an important distinction.

https://x.com/nickwallis/status/1989341894648959321?t=W85uUEsUTQQmaD64c_Enow&s=19

I also think she did very well to remain calm and clear about what the concerns were and why they were bringing them in the face of a tantrum from SD.

Wonder if he still thinks their reasoning was flimsy....

Nick Wallis (@nickwallis) on X

.. transphobic manner - put to the claimant and then added to the case at the last moment purely to prejudice her in the tribunal's mind. The other thing is that bias is not about fairness to parties it's about public confidence in the fairness of just...

https://x.com/nickwallis/status/1989341894648959321?s=19&t=W85uUEsUTQQmaD64c_Enow

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 18:59

GrumpyUngulate · 15/11/2025 18:47

This may be a misread of social media, I am far from expert in it's ways. But 'Professor' Boyd is said to live in Armagh, and to have a 22yr old daughter named Zoe. There is a Zoe Boyd of that approximate age operating beauty salons in Armagh/Portadown. That same Zoe Boyd appears to be in a relationship with a somewhat gender-fluid female called Frankie Byrne.

https://www.facebook.com/zoe.boyd.71/posts/pfbid0YrdNKX7sXdKpSwKzHHsEqMo5AZoaoY4hV2AMU6k4QnD3uuJEjqaLhNFboGsVozQ3l

https://www.facebook.com/zoe.boyd.71/posts/pfbid0ZW5zd2zZxcUEGsgUkyLSNScE21vmnYySVRknSgegJjaHVXsBKwjtmsSVsvWfoDpyl

This is highly speculative and must not be taken as fact, but if that's the same Zoe Boyd it's quite possible that her mother would have firm views on trans rights etc.

Yes that’s all correct

BettyBooper · 15/11/2025 19:03

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 18:07

Everyone is seated with water in front of them. Her bag was beside her.

She needs drugs, pop them out discretely and take it - or grab the meds and signal that you need you rise.

You don’t start getting agitated, run out the room without your meds at the exact time Naomi uses the phrase ‘you say tranwoman I say a man who identities as trans (or some such)’.

And then a decent while later send the clerk back out for your bag.

Which one sounds like someone going to take medication?

It's almost as if she ran out of the room for another reason and then needed her medication.

Hmmmm.

The Judge is up to her neck in it.

Thanks goodness for NW and TT and everyone demanding open justice.

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:04

They both show up here for re-appointment in 2011

McKeown is on Employment and Industrial Tribunals
https://archive.niassembly.gov.uk/researchandlibrary/deposited_papers/2011//dp829.pdf

https://archive.niassembly.gov.uk/researchandlibrary/deposited_papers/2011/dp829.pdf

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:05

BettyBooper · 15/11/2025 19:03

It's almost as if she ran out of the room for another reason and then needed her medication.

Hmmmm.

The Judge is up to her neck in it.

Thanks goodness for NW and TT and everyone demanding open justice.

That’s exactly what I would say we saw.

I can believe she is unwell and needs medication. But there are too many holes in the narrative.

Maybe took a rager / header then needed her meds?

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:07

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 18:55

Was reading through the details of yesterday again. I thought NC point about what bias is in this context was an important distinction.

https://x.com/nickwallis/status/1989341894648959321?t=W85uUEsUTQQmaD64c_Enow&s=19

I also think she did very well to remain calm and clear about what the concerns were and why they were bringing them in the face of a tantrum from SD.

Wonder if he still thinks their reasoning was flimsy....

The other thing is that bias is not about fairness to parties it's about public confidence in the fairness of justice.

Just reiterating this.

This line is of the utmost relevance here and this is what need to be focused on by the likes of SD. It is not whether he thinks the grounds are flimsy, it is if the grounds are enough to jeopardise the public's faith in the process.

Im not sure the judge really weighed this up in the heat of the moment.

Talkinpeace · 15/11/2025 19:09

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:04

They both show up here for re-appointment in 2011

McKeown is on Employment and Industrial Tribunals
https://archive.niassembly.gov.uk/researchandlibrary/deposited_papers/2011//dp829.pdf

Mrs Boyd, not Professor Boyd ...

KittyWilkinson · 15/11/2025 19:11

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:04

They both show up here for re-appointment in 2011

McKeown is on Employment and Industrial Tribunals
https://archive.niassembly.gov.uk/researchandlibrary/deposited_papers/2011//dp829.pdf

Well that's interesting. She just shows up as Mrs. on that.

BettyBooper · 15/11/2025 19:16

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:07

The other thing is that bias is not about fairness to parties it's about public confidence in the fairness of justice.

Just reiterating this.

This line is of the utmost relevance here and this is what need to be focused on by the likes of SD. It is not whether he thinks the grounds are flimsy, it is if the grounds are enough to jeopardise the public's faith in the process.

Im not sure the judge really weighed this up in the heat of the moment.

Absolutely this.

Which is why I was concerned that SD said he would oppose a recusal even before he knew what it was about!

Largesso · 15/11/2025 19:17

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:04

They both show up here for re-appointment in 2011

McKeown is on Employment and Industrial Tribunals
https://archive.niassembly.gov.uk/researchandlibrary/deposited_papers/2011//dp829.pdf

Mrs D Boyd. No sign of Prof.

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:19

Boiledbeetle · 15/11/2025 16:46

I don't know what is up with the link, but I still have the page open. So I've screenshot the top.

According to this the same Empey is responsible for appointing DB to the tribunal panel and Invest NI and these 2 other boards?

Useful friendship

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:22

BettyBooper · 15/11/2025 19:16

Absolutely this.

Which is why I was concerned that SD said he would oppose a recusal even before he knew what it was about!

Good point.

And the judge telling everyone NC and CE were being disrespectful when actually they were treating due process and professional responsibility with the utmost respect indeed.

Largesso · 15/11/2025 19:22

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:07

The other thing is that bias is not about fairness to parties it's about public confidence in the fairness of justice.

Just reiterating this.

This line is of the utmost relevance here and this is what need to be focused on by the likes of SD. It is not whether he thinks the grounds are flimsy, it is if the grounds are enough to jeopardise the public's faith in the process.

Im not sure the judge really weighed this up in the heat of the moment.

Although, I think he had to put on a show because he is a bit out of his depth, perhaps. The rage seems like cover for, perhaps, being fully salient that what matters is not bias per se (tricky to prove) but the perception of it and so public trust. He couldn’t just agree that they need to take the application seriously off the bat because he didn’t know where that would lead so he hopes outrage would give him time. He was also following the outrage signal sent out by Sturgeon earlier. Both out of their depth perhaps. Beginning by being overly confident and through the testimony being a bit shaken by NC SKILL.

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:25

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:07

The other thing is that bias is not about fairness to parties it's about public confidence in the fairness of justice.

Just reiterating this.

This line is of the utmost relevance here and this is what need to be focused on by the likes of SD. It is not whether he thinks the grounds are flimsy, it is if the grounds are enough to jeopardise the public's faith in the process.

Im not sure the judge really weighed this up in the heat of the moment.

Sitting in the room it does not look to the public that a fair hearing is possible.

  • A likely fraud who supports LGBTQ hashtags?
  • Someone who needs meds but runs away from her bag
  • A judge saying that’s not how we do things here and othering the wee English cutties.
  • Interjections any time Naomi starts to talk about trans issues
  • And a very angry judge.
AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:26

Largesso · 15/11/2025 19:22

Although, I think he had to put on a show because he is a bit out of his depth, perhaps. The rage seems like cover for, perhaps, being fully salient that what matters is not bias per se (tricky to prove) but the perception of it and so public trust. He couldn’t just agree that they need to take the application seriously off the bat because he didn’t know where that would lead so he hopes outrage would give him time. He was also following the outrage signal sent out by Sturgeon earlier. Both out of their depth perhaps. Beginning by being overly confident and through the testimony being a bit shaken by NC SKILL.

Edited

I think that's probably the case.

I can't imagine being so bold as to fight NC with bluster, as her icy clarity would make me freeze.

But it did seem that the over the top 'how very dare you?' as tactical and belied panic or lack of experience. It probably works a lot to shut people up. Just not our kind of people.

Largesso · 15/11/2025 19:31

It was also really noticeable that Sturgeon’s outrage did not progress into admonishments after applications were submitted.

I think because she is agin these uppity big shots from over there coming into her patch she just reacted to their lateness as something signalling disrespect to her and her position because she is convinced they do disrespect her and her position.

She failed to have her listening ears on, as they say, and if she had she would have tuned into the fact something very serious was afoot and would have taken a deep breath in and not thrown a tantrum AND chucked her toys out the pram (to totally mix my metaphors) by threatening to lift MD’s oath as punishment to SM’s team.

She will be aware the climb down made her look a bit of an arse. She must have spent most of that hour trying to find law that would support that decision but came there none.

SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:34

AnnoyingAlarm · 15/11/2025 19:26

I think that's probably the case.

I can't imagine being so bold as to fight NC with bluster, as her icy clarity would make me freeze.

But it did seem that the over the top 'how very dare you?' as tactical and belied panic or lack of experience. It probably works a lot to shut people up. Just not our kind of people.

SD was of course going to oppose no matter the evidence.

Because if most of your work is employment and there are literally only 5 Judges you will ever encounter can your mortgage or network take the risk of losing all your cases?

‘That’s not how we do things here’

  • We don’t challenge Judges
  • Send a solicitor instead of Counsel
  • Speak true things out loud about women’s rights
  • Check credentials of ‘Profs’
  • And we definitely never not ever ever make an application for recusal.
SexRealistic · 15/11/2025 19:38

Largesso · 15/11/2025 19:31

It was also really noticeable that Sturgeon’s outrage did not progress into admonishments after applications were submitted.

I think because she is agin these uppity big shots from over there coming into her patch she just reacted to their lateness as something signalling disrespect to her and her position because she is convinced they do disrespect her and her position.

She failed to have her listening ears on, as they say, and if she had she would have tuned into the fact something very serious was afoot and would have taken a deep breath in and not thrown a tantrum AND chucked her toys out the pram (to totally mix my metaphors) by threatening to lift MD’s oath as punishment to SM’s team.

She will be aware the climb down made her look a bit of an arse. She must have spent most of that hour trying to find law that would support that decision but came there none.

Yes this speaks to bias.

She was willing to prejudice the claimant because her Counsel was drafting an application.

She actually suggested doing something illegal to spite Naomi and Charlotte.
She was spitting and said she’d do it. Not she would consider it, she would do it.

And then had to retreat since it was an illegal act.

But oh no not a hint of bias.

How dare Sara get a team of people who supported her and stand up for her rights! This isn’t how it’s supposed to go around ‘here’.

ChrisPadley · 15/11/2025 19:41

This old webpage re. Re3 states she was visiting professor and University of Ulster and tutor and Queens Belfast.

<a class="break-all" href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160820153951/re3group.com/view.php?PID=47&TID=2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20160820153951/re3group.com/view.php?PID=47&TID=2

Re3 - Resource, Recycling & Recovery

https://web.archive.org/web/20160820153951/http://re3group.com/view.php?PID=47&TID=2

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread