Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A little piece of insight

1000 replies

Tandora · 02/10/2025 13:48

Into a topic so woefully misunderstood.

A little piece of insight
OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
NImumconfused · 03/10/2025 14:13

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:11

The problem with your logic is here:

"even though Dr Upton knows perfectly well that they're not including trans women in their definition of female?"

She doesn't "know [this] perfectly well". She doesn't know this at all.
That is the entire problem. I know you can't see this. You can't accept it. But it is the reality of the people and the world that you are living in.

I don't believe that. Dr Upton knows that their body is that if a male, and lived the majority of their life so far as a man. They know perfectly well that most people will not regard them as female.

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:15

MurkyWeather2 · 03/10/2025 14:13

Well we can agree that the problem is Dr Upton's stupidity then

No, Dr Upton is not stupid - she is trans.

The problem is that you don't understand , and can't accept, what it means to be trans.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:15

Exactly. Just like he knew Sandie Peggie regarded him as a male.

Beowulfa · 03/10/2025 14:16

According to the last census there are far more people in this country who have a learning disability or for whom English is not their first language than there are trans-identifying people.

These are the people disadvantaged when you start pretending that long-established everyday words like "woman" and "female" are in some kind of linguistic dispute. These people don't have celebrities wearing t-shirts in support of them though, or special flags, or entire months of parades.

We've been told we are too narrow-minded to understand the trans experience. Well, Tandora, I challenge you to do some volunteering with those with severe disabilities and see how helpful it is to start fucking around with basic, clearly understood language.

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:16

NImumconfused · 03/10/2025 14:13

I don't believe that. Dr Upton knows that their body is that if a male, and lived the majority of their life so far as a man. They know perfectly well that most people will not regard them as female.

They know perfectly well that most people will not regard them as female.

They don't know that, nor do you, and nor do I.
None of us have any idea how "most people" regard Dr Upton.

OP posts:
LorrieTosh · 03/10/2025 14:16

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:00

If you ask for a 'female' doctor, Dr Upton would interpret herself as being eligible to treat you as she understands herself to be female.

If you ask for a 'female' doctor, and also specify that you are not comfortable with a trans woman, Dr Upton would understand your meaning and she would recognise that she was not eligible to treat you.

I understand that would involve the inclusion of an extra sentence - maybe seven? - more words. No doubt this is a terrible and unspeakable burden for you.

I was under the impression that saying “I want a female doctor - but not a trans woman: a biologically female doctor” would mark the patient as a bigot to somebody like you.

Any medical professional should surely understand what is implied by the request for a female doctor. If need be, maybe the doctor could have a little rummage around her penis and testicles to remind herself that she should keep her dick a respectful distance away from a woman who has made a clearly expressed request for single-sex provision.

I’d expect somebody so focused on safety, dignity, and privacy to have a very deep understanding of the reasons a request like this might be made. Weird that the most marginalised, most oppressed group so often don’t seem to understand (or care) about the dignity of others unless it’s spelled out in terms that allow them to make it about them/take offence, isn’t it?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:16

Have you ever seen him in the flesh? I’ve seen him in court. And everyone would know his sex.

timesublimelysilencesthewhys · 03/10/2025 14:17

Tandora · 03/10/2025 13:56

Dr Upton doesn't "get to attend". You have the right to request she doesn't attend to you.

The question was 'how can I make it clear I don't want Dr. Upton to attend'. I suggested language to do so that would be clear.
Another poster said she wouldn't use that language, she would use alternative language. i pointed out that her alternative language would be received by many as unnecessary and offensive.

Edited

When a women requests a women HCP, she can say 'female', 'woman', 'lady', basically any word she understands to get the message across.

The NHS cannot presume that someone requesting a medical appointment has the first clue about the bonkers rules around trans ideology.

If someone doesnt say 'female', or doesnt explicitly say not a man in a dress, the NHS cannot assume shes happy to be treated by a transvestite man.

Its trans people fault if they are offended by this, if it upset them and their allies, because its their delusions that have lead to this.

Its part of a long line of delusions. They think their inner feelings are more important than anyone elses, that other people exist to make them happy, that they can change the meaning of words, or expect others to listen to half baked rambling theories that change constantly anyway.

EuclidianGeometryFan · 03/10/2025 14:17

@Tandora
few people would doubt that ASD is real, and that for most individuals it is a persistent condition, underpinned by complex and durable neurological differences that cannot easily be 'cured'. The same is true for being trans.

Interesting comparison of gender dysphoria to autism.

First - it is not proven that gender dysphoria is a neurological difference like autism, as opposed to a mental illness.
Neither can be cured - but the difference is that whilst autism will never be 'curable', because it is not an illness, dysphoria may one day be curable (if it is an illness).

Second - the more interesting part of the analogy is the requirement of the rest of society to make accommodations.
Few would argue that we should not make any accommodations to enable autistic people to take part in society. But these accommodations don't require half of society to be seriously disadvantaged.
Simple accommodations are fine - men can wear dresses and autistic people can wear headphones in the office.

If an autistic person insisted that all cinemas had to show all films with the lights up, the sound right down, and subtitles on the screen, they would be laughed at and ignored. If they persisted in their insistence, they would be told to seek out one of the 'autism friendly' screenings that many cinemas now offer.

Men with gender dysphoria who want to use women's toilets are like the autistic person insisting ALL film showings should be adapted to suit autism. The men with dysphoria should just go to the facilities meant for them (in this analogy, the fully enclosed unisex toilet is like the special autism screening).

And if an autistic person who doesn't like loud noise wants to go to a big rock concert but with the sound turned down, well tough, they can't. Likewise, many life experiences are just for biological females, not men with dysphoria.

MurkyWeather2 · 03/10/2025 14:17

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:15

No, Dr Upton is not stupid - she is trans.

The problem is that you don't understand , and can't accept, what it means to be trans.

I'm sorry, which version of 'being trans' do you want me to accept? There are so many. How about this one from a peer-reviewed paper:
"I argue for the possibility of reading the puppygirl style as a critical practice: one that hints at ways of being trans that do not rely on the ciscentric understanding of 'the human' as their point of reference."

SixtyTwoPercent · 03/10/2025 14:18

Tandora · 03/10/2025 09:49

Again this is where you need to get out of your own head- this isn't about some grand theory of sex/ gender or "what a woman is". It's not about stereotypes or clothes or projection.

A trans woman knows they are a trans woman simply because of the acute psychological pain / torture/ disorientation / dissasociatjon they experience when someone calls them / perceives them as a man. And conversely the complete absence of this when someone calls/ recognises them as a woman- which feels psychologically comfortable/ right/ true/ makes sense. Thats it. Thats how they know,

A trans woman knows they are a trans woman simply because of the acute psychological pain / torture/ disorientation / dissasociatjon they experience...

You are spot on.
They are feeling these things because they are a transwoman. Not because they are female.

But this still doesn't explain why I can't understand what it's like to be trans but a male can understand what it's like to be female. Why for thee but not for me?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:18

LorrieTosh · 03/10/2025 14:16

I was under the impression that saying “I want a female doctor - but not a trans woman: a biologically female doctor” would mark the patient as a bigot to somebody like you.

Any medical professional should surely understand what is implied by the request for a female doctor. If need be, maybe the doctor could have a little rummage around her penis and testicles to remind herself that she should keep her dick a respectful distance away from a woman who has made a clearly expressed request for single-sex provision.

I’d expect somebody so focused on safety, dignity, and privacy to have a very deep understanding of the reasons a request like this might be made. Weird that the most marginalised, most oppressed group so often don’t seem to understand (or care) about the dignity of others unless it’s spelled out in terms that allow them to make it about them/take offence, isn’t it?

Oh I’m quite sure this poster is aware that saying “I don’t want a “trans woman” doctor would be perceived as “transphobia” by Upton and many of the idiots at NHS Fife rather than simply a request for a female doctor.

teawamutu · 03/10/2025 14:19

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:08

Do you think it’s appropriate to mock the needs of sexual assault survivors then? Taztoy has been very clear why she needs a female doctor, and most people don’t imagine that they need to specify that this won’t include any men.

I know - bar was already low in terms of the consideration given to women and trauma sufferers, but by adding mockery to patronising, Tan has just managed to limbo under it.

First instinct is to say FOTTFSOFAWYGTFOSM 😡but on reflection, Tan is doing a sterling job of showing the lurkers exactly why women need single sex spaces and exactly how awful and callous the TRA attitude is.

So... Thanks, I guess?

GenderlessVoid · 03/10/2025 14:19

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:11

The problem with your logic is here:

"even though Dr Upton knows perfectly well that they're not including trans women in their definition of female?"

She doesn't "know [this] perfectly well". She doesn't know this at all.
That is the entire problem. I know you can't see this. You can't accept it. But it is the reality of the people and the world that you are living in.

If Dr Upton does not know this, DU should not be practicing medicine.

DU may not believe it but DU should know that the average person will view DU as a man. If DU is unable to grasp this, DU is dangerous and not fit to practice.

You want all of us to understand DU's POV, why don't you expect DU to understand other people's POV?

Understanding patients is an important part of DU's job but apparently, the patients are the ones who have to see DU's POV, even if they are in pain, distracted, have limited English, know nothing about trans, may have limited intelligence or have ASD, schizophrenia, or some other disability/condition that makes it impossible to have a theory of mind.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:19

MurkyWeather2 · 03/10/2025 14:17

I'm sorry, which version of 'being trans' do you want me to accept? There are so many. How about this one from a peer-reviewed paper:
"I argue for the possibility of reading the puppygirl style as a critical practice: one that hints at ways of being trans that do not rely on the ciscentric understanding of 'the human' as their point of reference."

Oh yes that sounds like the brand of academia we’re dealing with on this thread.

GAJLY · 03/10/2025 14:20

Beowulfa · 02/10/2025 13:52

It's still a No to blokes in women's spaces.

Agree 👆

Ereshkigalangcleg · 03/10/2025 14:20

teawamutu · 03/10/2025 14:19

I know - bar was already low in terms of the consideration given to women and trauma sufferers, but by adding mockery to patronising, Tan has just managed to limbo under it.

First instinct is to say FOTTFSOFAWYGTFOSM 😡but on reflection, Tan is doing a sterling job of showing the lurkers exactly why women need single sex spaces and exactly how awful and callous the TRA attitude is.

So... Thanks, I guess?

I agree.

Catiette · 03/10/2025 14:20

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:00

If you ask for a 'female' doctor, Dr Upton would interpret herself as being eligible to treat you as she understands herself to be female.

If you ask for a 'female' doctor, and also specify that you are not comfortable with a trans woman, Dr Upton would understand your meaning and she would recognise that she was not eligible to treat you.

I understand that would involve the inclusion of an extra sentence - maybe seven? - more words. No doubt this is a terrible and unspeakable burden for you.

So you support the loss of any word at all with which the class of humans susceptible to pregnancy, FGM and house-arrest in Afghanistan may describe themselves - and all on the basis of how trans-identifying males ‚see themselves‘ and the words they prefer to use?

Either you’re not posting in good faith or, if you are, I find your views genuinely frightening. The double standards you’re exhibiting in whose perception and language you choose to accept, and whose you reject, are breathtaking. The age-old misogynist conviction that woman is what man says she is.

Yes, this is indeed a ‘terrible and unspeakable (did you mean to pun there? I’m mean, you are literally arguing for making the burden of sexism unspeakable!) burden’ that women have carried for centuries - in large part because of the complicity of confused and fearful female quislings.

DeanElderberry · 03/10/2025 14:21

It is very odd that delusional men suffering from Body Anxiety Disorder (BAD) (because it is only the men who are being demanding in this way) are being seen as more important than all other humans.

x.com/Psychgirl211/status/1808825717204922755

Dr P: "Anti-Trans bigot" (@Psychgirl211) on X

Why ‘Gender Dysphoria’ is a lie

https://x.com/Psychgirl211/status/1808825717204922755

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 03/10/2025 14:21

..............who know not the darnedest thing about which they speak and have precisely zero insight into what being trans is.

Neither do you @Tandora

I have a responsibility to challenge that.
Why?
Surely you should be challenging the men who wish to invade women's safe spaces, not arguing that they belong there because they're "feeling a bit sad".

In any case, TIM are not sad.
Let's be thoroughly realistic.
They're angry.
They're enraged.
They're furious.

They want to come in, and they've been told they can't, because they're biological males. That doesn't sadden them. It makes them hopping mad.

ThatCyanCat · 03/10/2025 14:25

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:02

Listen you do you, be as rude as you like.

Well, better rude than a predator, predator enabler or liar. But your way sounds way ruder to me. So, since we accept that women can exclude transwomen from some spaces, and it's just about how we say it, then this presumably means we can have women only changing rooms, but we must mark them "Women except transwomen" on the door. Or women's sports, but marked as women's sports, no transwomen. Or a lesbian event but the posters state "Lesbians, no transbians".

That sounds less offensive to you?

Greyskybluesky · 03/10/2025 14:26

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:06

uh-huh- just as I thought.

Ok I have better things to do with my time.

If posters like @MyAmpleSheep want to return to the thread and raise the bar of the conversation a little again, I'll re-engage.

So long, and thanks for all the insight

NImumconfused · 03/10/2025 14:26

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:16

They know perfectly well that most people will not regard them as female.

They don't know that, nor do you, and nor do I.
None of us have any idea how "most people" regard Dr Upton.

It's not unreasonable to assume that the majority of people will understand female to mean what it has meant for the last x thousand years, as opposed to what a very small minority have chosen to try to change it to in the last 10 or 15.

soupycustard · 03/10/2025 14:26

So we don't understand Dr Upton, because he's trans. But he's actually a female. A biological one no less. So he's not trans anything. He is an actual female. And also he would be very offended and upset to be called trans. Even though the person telling us this is calling him trans.

DuesToTheDirt · 03/10/2025 14:27

Tandora · 03/10/2025 14:04

Upton is (and I suspect is perfectly aware) not a female

No Dr Upton is not "aware" that she is "not a female". Quite the opposite in fact. That is the entire problem.

You are struggling to understand the basic principle that not everyone shares the same perspective as you. It's quite extraordinary really.

Edited

Oh come on. You're saying that a man, who has always been a man (until five minutes ago), looks like a man, and is known by everyone else to be a man, is not actually aware that he is not female. Despite being, you know, an actual qualified doctor. If he doesn't know he's not female he shouldn't have passed his degree.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.