Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Graham Linehan arrested on arrival at Heathrow

1000 replies

IDareSay · 02/09/2025 10:30

Arrested again! Details on his Substack. This is beyond a joke; 5 armed officers!

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/i-just-got-arrested-again

I just got arrested again

I arrived back in London to discover the UK is still a police state run by trans activists

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/i-just-got-arrested-again

OP posts:
Thread gallery
48
Igneococcus · 02/09/2025 18:05

Made the Radio 3 news bulletin.

NeverOneBiscuit · 02/09/2025 18:05

Well at least Starmer has managed to come out with a fairly decent statement for a change. Starmer, & many of those now in his cabinet, bear much responsibility for this ridiculous state of affairs.

When a man in his position stumbled & dissembled over what a woman is, & said it wasn’t right to say that only women have a cervix, what the hell did he think he was adding to the public discourse around this topic?

These cowardly, false statements enabled Stonewall etc to lurch ahead with their misinterpretation of the EA 2010. And here we are, a brave, honest man like Glinner being treated like a dangerous criminal at an airport.

Hopefully this will backfire on the vexatious TRAs, as more people’s eyes are opened to this unhinged ideology.

SabrinaThwaite · 02/09/2025 18:06

NeverOneBiscuit · 02/09/2025 18:05

Well at least Starmer has managed to come out with a fairly decent statement for a change. Starmer, & many of those now in his cabinet, bear much responsibility for this ridiculous state of affairs.

When a man in his position stumbled & dissembled over what a woman is, & said it wasn’t right to say that only women have a cervix, what the hell did he think he was adding to the public discourse around this topic?

These cowardly, false statements enabled Stonewall etc to lurch ahead with their misinterpretation of the EA 2010. And here we are, a brave, honest man like Glinner being treated like a dangerous criminal at an airport.

Hopefully this will backfire on the vexatious TRAs, as more people’s eyes are opened to this unhinged ideology.

Might be a new head of comms at No 10.

Might have been a trustee at Sex Matters.

Might know which way the wind is blowing with the general public.

IwantToRetire · 02/09/2025 18:07

I briefly heard about this around lunch time and thought I had misheard.

5 ARMED police?!!!

On what planet does anyone think this is appropriate.

As other have said, if there was something to investigate, invite for an interview.

Is it any wonder so many people think those in power are totally out of touch.

Even if you have never heard of Glinner, trans issues etc., what does it say that the State thinks it should send 5 ARMED police to arrest a comedian, or is that comedy writer.

TheKeatingFive · 02/09/2025 18:10

Back up the truck a minute.

I can't believe this has only just occurred to me, but ...

Has any man attempting to use the ladies facilities/taken pictures of themselves doing so for SM, been arrested for breaking the law?

MrsSlatersParrot · 02/09/2025 18:11

ThatCyanCat · 02/09/2025 18:03

My God, you truly think this post is clever.

I would go through this, sir, but anyone who misses the point of the final hashtag as fully and embarrassingly as you do wouldn't be capable of following it. I can't actually believe that you still think you're in a position to patronise. That's amazing.

Genderism is nothing but one enormous double standard, that men are entitled to more of women's rights than women are, and everything, including the crazy one you perpetuate here as you tell women rape and death threats don't exist and don't matter much if they do, projects from that. The idea that we don't know what a woman is, but we know a man is one. That we don't know what sex someone is but we should know what sex they're pretending to be.

Tribalism doesn't mean what you think it does, double standards doesn't mean what you think it does, tsunami was meant metaphorically if that helps you (you genderists do very selectively struggle with metaphor and figures of speech, I know) and my God the #bekind didn't mean what you think it did either.

Lord, grant me the misplaced confidence...

"as you tell women rape and death threats don't exist and don't matter much if they do"

But that has neither been said nor implied, has it? Hmm? Please do check back, I'll be happy to wait whilst you do.

The fact I have stated, repeatedly, my stance on the abysmal posts that are made against us - as evidenced by the website previously linked - still doesn't seem to have sunk in. Again, please do take a moment to go back and read - carefully - the relevant posts. Again, I'll be very happy to wait whilst you do.

As to the remainder of your tirade, I'm not convinced it's really worth dismantling as it does tend - just tend mind you - to suggest a wee bit of biased assumption about me that is so firmly entrenched that any evidence to the contrary is either outright ignored or twisted to fit a certain narrative. I'm not wholly convinced somebody in that position can be helped, so we'll agree to disagree and leave it there.

#bekind 😊

ArabellaScott · 02/09/2025 18:11

Glinner · 02/09/2025 14:41

Hello! Yes it is. Although I won't be posting much for a bit as I desperately need to sleep!

Is it wise to let on you're hiding out in the priest hole, here? Dawn'll have a SWAT team round in minutes.

IwantToRetire · 02/09/2025 18:11

Just another aspect but again a sign on the problem.

That TWAT who hosts the BBC R4 news had to announce this as a news item and you could hear how hard he found it not to be totally dismissive of Glinner. But he always does that.

But what was really gross and upsetting, but it is the BBC, the arts correspondent or whoever then did a more details report droned on and on about trans rights, and conflict. Didn't one mention the issue, or the fact, that this is about women's sex based rights.

On any other topic the BBC would aim for "balance" but here they just didn't bother.

And clearly the fact that Evan Davis has the prime PM slot and can use it as a platform to sneer or silence women is a complete disgrace.

Daygloboo · 02/09/2025 18:11

What did he SAAAAY???

hihelenhi · 02/09/2025 18:12

corlan · 02/09/2025 18:04

Indeed. So who ordered the arrest? Something's off.

Yes, this. It's really not a run of the mill reaction, even by current skewed standards. Who on earth okayed this?

CohensDiamondTeeth · 02/09/2025 18:12

MrsSlatersParrot · 02/09/2025 17:44

"Have you seen the signs calling for the punching, decapitation or death of TERFS? Seen the TERF is a slur website? Read what disgusting things these trans identified men tweet and write on reddit?", etc., etc.

An emotive response is rarely a good idea.

Did you miss the part of my post in which I said "And of course death and rape threats matter; they matter very deeply, and should be treated very seriously", or did you blank it through confirmation bias? If you did miss it, please read it again; it's pretty plain that I think all such threats are hideous and should be dealt with seriously.

Unfortunately, it's simply not the case that they are.
My assumption, and it is an assumption, is that this happens not because they are targeted at self-labelled 'TERFs' but because those posting in the kinds of place you helpfully mentioned simply aren't significant enough for the police to bother with.
I agree, they should; but it's naïve to think they will.

Hope this has helped clarify things for you.

An emotive response is rarely a good idea.

Oh thank you for that, I shall try to keep my womanly emotions in check shall I? Don't want to my emotional womanly self to get all hysterical or anything 🙄

Personally I think a smug, patronising response such as "An emotive response is rarely a good idea", is rarely a good idea.

Did you miss the part of my post in which I said "And of course death and rape threats matter; they matter very deeply, and should be treated very seriously", or did you blank it through confirmation bias?

No I did not miss it, but it was dismissive given the police haven't taken any of the threats of violence from the TRA side at all seriously. Many women and others like GL who have made non violent or factual tweets on the other hand...

If you did miss it, please read it again; it's pretty plain that I think all such threats are hideous and should be dealt with seriously.
Unfortunately, it's simply not the case that they are.

And women (and men) are allowed to be very angry at the clear double standard on display. If you don't see the double standard IMO you are biased or not paying attention.

My assumption, and it is an assumption, is that this happens not because they are targeted at self-labelled 'TERFs' but because those posting in the kinds of place you helpfully mentioned simply aren't significant enough for the police to bother with.

IMO your assumption is wrong.

That is your opinion that they aren't significant enough for the police to bother with, I think most rational people would disagree and be utterly horrified to see even a fraction of what the violent TRAs have said.

Personally, I think any of those violent TRA tweets, signs etc are very clear examples of incitement to violence.

Rape, death threats, and threats of serious violence, sometimes with pictures of weapons too for good measure aren't significant enough are they not? Yep that would be bias.

I agree, they should; but it's naïve to think they will.

Why is it naïve to think they will? Application of the law and justice should be fair for all, shouldn't it? And if it's not, we (collectively) can do things about it, we don't just have to sit wringing our hands and going "oh well there's not much we can do about it". There has already been movement in this direction, the police have been told a few times now to stop misapplying the law and harassing GC women and men for inoffensive and factual tweets, and to focus on actual crimes - eventually I'd like to think that things will shift enough for the police to get up off their collective arses and actually prosecute these TRAs who tweet, shot and carry signs inciting actual violence against women.

Hope this has helped clarify things for you.

In a way it has, probably not in the way you mean.

Imnobody4 · 02/09/2025 18:12

Wow even Index on Censorship have commented. It this the tipping point?

The arrest of Graham Linehan by armed officers at the airport, apparently over comments he made on X, is very troubling. Whatever one may think about his posts it's hard to see how such a heavy-handed response is justified or proportionate.

https://x.com/IndexCensorship/status/1962902522273677370?t=M4cN9ThhVTM_NhwmG47A4Q&s=19

https://x.com/IndexCensorship/status/1962902522273677370?s=19&t=M4cN9ThhVTM_NhwmG47A4Q

SabrinaThwaite · 02/09/2025 18:12

TheKeatingFive · 02/09/2025 18:10

Back up the truck a minute.

I can't believe this has only just occurred to me, but ...

Has any man attempting to use the ladies facilities/taken pictures of themselves doing so for SM, been arrested for breaking the law?

Doubt it.

I believe there's an individual that could keep Police Scotland North East busy for a while though.

BunfightBetty · 02/09/2025 18:13

TheKeatingFive · 02/09/2025 18:10

Back up the truck a minute.

I can't believe this has only just occurred to me, but ...

Has any man attempting to use the ladies facilities/taken pictures of themselves doing so for SM, been arrested for breaking the law?

An extremely pertinent question.

Not that I am aware of.

hihelenhi · 02/09/2025 18:13

Daygloboo · 02/09/2025 18:11

What did he SAAAAY???

I'm sure if you read the whole thread or google it, you'll be able to find out for yourself.

IwantToRetire · 02/09/2025 18:13

Daygloboo · 02/09/2025 18:11

What did he SAAAAY???

As just posted shortly before your post read https://substack.com/home/post/p-172541933

BackToLurk · 02/09/2025 18:14

TheKeatingFive · 02/09/2025 18:10

Back up the truck a minute.

I can't believe this has only just occurred to me, but ...

Has any man attempting to use the ladies facilities/taken pictures of themselves doing so for SM, been arrested for breaking the law?

I don’t think it’s a criminal act

murasaki · 02/09/2025 18:16

BackToLurk · 02/09/2025 18:14

I don’t think it’s a criminal act

I'm not sure reminding women of an effective method of self defence after exhausting other options or implying that a crowd smells is either.

CohensDiamondTeeth · 02/09/2025 18:16

hihelenhi · 02/09/2025 17:50

Oh yes, do let's all apologise if our "tone" isn't ladylike or calm enough for you.

Just stop with the tone policing. There's nothing wrong at all with women being angry or "emotional" at the extreme double standards. Which literally put us in danger. I'm glad you think it's somehow theoretical and women being threatened with death and rape is not something any of us should get "emotional" about.

FFS.

Right?!

Ooh careful hihelenhi or you'll have to join me on MrsSlatersParrot's emotional woman naughty step 🙄😂

TheKeatingFive · 02/09/2025 18:16

BackToLurk · 02/09/2025 18:14

I don’t think it’s a criminal act

So how is the law upheld?

SabrinaThwaite · 02/09/2025 18:16

BackToLurk · 02/09/2025 18:14

I don’t think it’s a criminal act

It would be under the Workplace Regs.

MrsSlatersParrot · 02/09/2025 18:17

Imnobody4 · 02/09/2025 18:12

Wow even Index on Censorship have commented. It this the tipping point?

The arrest of Graham Linehan by armed officers at the airport, apparently over comments he made on X, is very troubling. Whatever one may think about his posts it's hard to see how such a heavy-handed response is justified or proportionate.

https://x.com/IndexCensorship/status/1962902522273677370?t=M4cN9ThhVTM_NhwmG47A4Q&s=19

I'm wondering if the shitstorm that's blown up over this isn't ultimately the best thing that can happen since it throws both the heavy-handedness of the police response, and the stark lack of action when TRAs make these kinds of horrific statements, into the spotlight.

Given the recently posted comment by the PM, clearly there are at least some people in positions of authority who are realising this whole situation makes the aggressive shutting down of people for posting on social media look a touch out of touch, as it were

BackToLurk · 02/09/2025 18:20

SabrinaThwaite · 02/09/2025 18:16

It would be under the Workplace Regs.

Is the offence committed by the person using the toilet or the organisation failing to provide single-sex facilities?

TheKeatingFive · 02/09/2025 18:20

MrsSlatersParrot · 02/09/2025 18:17

I'm wondering if the shitstorm that's blown up over this isn't ultimately the best thing that can happen since it throws both the heavy-handedness of the police response, and the stark lack of action when TRAs make these kinds of horrific statements, into the spotlight.

Given the recently posted comment by the PM, clearly there are at least some people in positions of authority who are realising this whole situation makes the aggressive shutting down of people for posting on social media look a touch out of touch, as it were

I guess Starmer doesn't want to give Vance any more ammunition

MrsSlatersParrot · 02/09/2025 18:20

BackToLurk · 02/09/2025 18:14

I don’t think it’s a criminal act

My assumption, an assumption obviously since I don't work for the police and - like everybody here - have no association with this case whatsoever, is that the police investigation would hang on a suspicion of 'incitement to violence'.
Good luck trying to get that charge to stick, though.

I really think the police have shot themselves in the foot here.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread