Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #47

1000 replies

nauticant · 29/07/2025 11:43

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence had been intended to be 28 July with 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing was to have ended on 30 July. However, it became apparent as the hearing progressed that this schedule wouldn't be followed. (Considerable understatement.)

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #40 can be found in this thread: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5379717-sandie-peggie-list-of-threads-covering-employment-tribunal-and-afterwards

Thread 41: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5379334-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-41 24 July 2025 to 25 July 2025
Thread 42: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5379820-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-42 25 July 2025 to 25 July 2025
Thread 43: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5379979-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-43 25 July 2025 to 27 July 2025
Thread 44: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5380196-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-44 25 July 2025 to 28 July 2025
Thread 45: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5381518-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-45 28 July 2025 to 28 July 2025
Thread 46: mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5381640-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-46 28 July 2025 to 29 July 2025

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
OP posts:
PennyAnnLane · 29/07/2025 18:24

Binman · 29/07/2025 18:08

This character assassination is one of the many reasons why women do not complain or challenge in the workplace. There are very few of us with flawless lives and backgrounds. I suspect some mud could be dug up on most of us which could cause us distress if read out in open court in a hostile environment.

How many sexual assaults and rapes go unreported due to the fear of not being believed or degraded in court. How many women do not challenge their employer for fear of being disciplined?

I am not an active feminist and most of my friendship circle have never heard of this case or deal with these situations in their life. However I applaud Sandi Peggie, whether her past makes me uncomfortable, whether she is not really that nice a person to know I am grateful that she was prepared to take this all of the way.

It is not without risk, she has been demoralised and disrespected and we cannot know how this has affected her health. I hope she is vindicated and I hope that her experience gives women the courage to speak out rather than be more afraid to.

It’s not just tribunals, a friend suggested to me I should stand to be a councillor in our local town because of an interest I have, but I wouldn’t dare because I don’t want people trawling through my social media or making things up about me, how many good politicians have been put off standing because they don’t want their lives dragged through the mud or every word twisted in a way that couldn’t have happened 20 years ago before social media?

StayWithinTheLines · 29/07/2025 18:26

About SP’s views inevitably impacting her care, as some have claimed here:

If I’m 100% honest, I probably am “transphobic” now. The actions of TRAs and people like Barker, Bryson, Upton et alia mean that my heart sinks when I see a TW, and I choose not to watch TV programmes that feature TW actors.

In the course of my job, if I have to deal with a TW on an individual basis, I give them the same level of service as anyone else. In fact if anything, I probably go out of my way to ensure they receive exemplary service. This is for two reasons: 1) I don’t want to give anyone cause for complaint, especially when the behaviour of so many TW shows they absolutely would complain and 2) I am aware of my own bias so I overcompensate to make sure it doesn’t show.

I am entitled to have these thoughts about TW. I am also sufficiently professional to draw a boundary between my personal beliefs and my behaviour at work. It seems SP, with her 30 years of exemplary service, is similarly capable. Is she racist? It seems so. Would I like her as a friend? Probably not. Am I transphobic? By the standards of the Left (of which I once considered myself a part until they lost their mind over something as fundamental as biological sex), yes I am. Am I a bad employee because of this? The four reward and recognition awards I’ve received in the past two years say not.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 29/07/2025 18:26

Binman · 29/07/2025 18:08

This character assassination is one of the many reasons why women do not complain or challenge in the workplace. There are very few of us with flawless lives and backgrounds. I suspect some mud could be dug up on most of us which could cause us distress if read out in open court in a hostile environment.

How many sexual assaults and rapes go unreported due to the fear of not being believed or degraded in court. How many women do not challenge their employer for fear of being disciplined?

I am not an active feminist and most of my friendship circle have never heard of this case or deal with these situations in their life. However I applaud Sandi Peggie, whether her past makes me uncomfortable, whether she is not really that nice a person to know I am grateful that she was prepared to take this all of the way.

It is not without risk, she has been demoralised and disrespected and we cannot know how this has affected her health. I hope she is vindicated and I hope that her experience gives women the courage to speak out rather than be more afraid to.

100% agree.

Firealarms · 29/07/2025 18:27

dimsiaradcymraeg · 29/07/2025 18:16

Ok, that makes more sense. Fife can see that SP will win but their character assignation will mean reduced compensation.

What’s the likely outcome for DU in all of this? Once the dust has settled, will he still have the freedom of the women’s CR?

DU likely will continue to be well-supported by the NHS. The tribunal can’t compel the NHS removes DU from women’s CR, but just say the NHS lose this case as a result. They likely will be liable for more claims if DU continues to use the CR. So logically they may review the decision after the outcome of the tribunal to limit their liability for future claims. It’s also possible they appeal the decision.

tribunalObserver · 29/07/2025 18:31

prh47bridge · 29/07/2025 18:06

Some people have wondered what JR is up to with some of her questioning. I think it is pretty obvious, especially if you look at what some TRAs have been pushing.

She is clearly going to argue that the SC judgement does not apply to changing rooms and that Fife were right to allow Upton to use the female changing room.

I believe she is going to argue that SP is a racist, homophobic, transphobic bigot. That she was not suffering from menstrual flooding at the time of the incident, but was seeking a confrontation with Upton and that, although they mishandled the process, Fife's action against her was correct.

Her attempts to get SP to reveal who was funding her suggests she may have bought into the TRA narrative that Sex Matters have been funding SP and encouraged her to provoke this confrontation. However, JR knows she is not allowed to ask that question, nor is she allowed to ask about SP's instructions to her legal team. More things that could be raised with the Bar Standards Board.

What's the likely route for her to be in trouble with the BSB? My only awareness is that is gc barristers saying they've been maliciously reported, I think. I assume - surely? - it's not something for the non-legally trained among us to have any role in. Is it likely NC would report her, or Judge Kemp?

BouncyCastleNHSSquirrels · 29/07/2025 18:33

Just want to say that regardless of my last few posts which were very much in the "thinking out loud" vein about the abhorrent nature of racism, and the possible effects of it in a medical setting, I was not making a value judgement on Sandi Peggie or on whether she was racist or not.

I think the memes she shared are terrible, and wouldn't agree with her on a number of topics, but I still stand with her that her rights to ss CR etc don't and shouldn't hinge on her personal opinions or character.

I also think that with her long, unblemished career and from reports that she was a really good, caring nurse, that she is clearly very good at her job, and it doesn't sound like any of her personal opinions have caused her to give anything less than excellent care.

Thank you @Veryweirdsadtimes for sharing your thoughts, I'm really sorry about your dad Flowers

ETA: missed a word, bold and underlined.

Charabanc · 29/07/2025 18:34

Profhilodisaster · 29/07/2025 16:26

Was it Gina (who likes a drink) that pulled out of testifying earlier , possibly because she didn't want to be made to look bad ?
Are witnesses allowed to hear evidence given by previous witnesses? How would she have known that her colleague was made to look an idiot?

No it was Sandra someone.

ETA it was LN who told us (and the rest of the UK) that Gina likes a drink.

I wonder if they'll be off to Benidorm together this year? 🤔

mrshoho · 29/07/2025 18:34

Did I read that right? You lurk on around 400 trans groups? @TheLivelyZebra I'm impressed with your stamina and stomach for it! I agree with your analysis and recognise the traits.

UpDo · 29/07/2025 18:44

I think the memes she shared are terrible, and wouldn't agree with her on a number of topics, but I still stand with her that her rights to ss CR etc don't and shouldn't hinge on her personal opinions or character.

And the same is of course true of the various other women who've behaved badly in some way in connection with these proceedings. The perjurers, other racist joke lovers, bullies and nasty pieces of work. This has no effect on their sex based rights in the workplace.

Lins77 · 29/07/2025 18:45

Can someone tell me what the relevance of Gina-who-likes-a-drink was? I've not been able to follow that much today. Thanks!

DrPrunesqualer · 29/07/2025 18:48

Lins77 · 29/07/2025 18:45

Can someone tell me what the relevance of Gina-who-likes-a-drink was? I've not been able to follow that much today. Thanks!

Gina and Lindsey from the Benedorm WhatsApp. Lindsey mentioned something in passing about Gina had probably had too much to drink by then. So in classic mumsnet style it’s all

’Gina who likes a drink’

Charabanc · 29/07/2025 18:51

DrPrunesqualer · 29/07/2025 18:48

Gina and Lindsey from the Benedorm WhatsApp. Lindsey mentioned something in passing about Gina had probably had too much to drink by then. So in classic mumsnet style it’s all

’Gina who likes a drink’

NC asked LN was drunk at that point. LN's answer was

Gina likes a drink

It's a direct quote from TT. I'll try and find the link.

Lins77 · 29/07/2025 18:54

Thanks both!

Charabanc · 29/07/2025 18:56

DrPrunesqualer · 29/07/2025 18:48

Gina and Lindsey from the Benedorm WhatsApp. Lindsey mentioned something in passing about Gina had probably had too much to drink by then. So in classic mumsnet style it’s all

’Gina who likes a drink’

Here are the quotes:

LN I have no idea. I would hope so but is 7 yrs worth
NC There's evidence in this chat isnt there, that [no sound but NC may be looking for page] Turn please to p1709. This is a 1:1 chat betwn u and Gina
Yes
NC Gina says Sandra is pissing me off. She's been texting for a pic
of the weirdo but sent a pic of me back. Gina is annoyed w Sandie.
Yes
NC She'd asked the wrong person. But her husband was having a difficult time due to personal issues
LN I dont know abou tthe [muted] birthday
NC Gina had a had a few drinks at this point

LM - Gina likes to have a drink. Didn't know she was drunk.

(My mistake, it was Gina likes to have a drink. No "classic Mumsnet style", just a direct quote.)

They're on this page:

www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5381518-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-45?page=20

thenoisiesttermagant · 29/07/2025 18:56

Firealarms · 29/07/2025 18:27

DU likely will continue to be well-supported by the NHS. The tribunal can’t compel the NHS removes DU from women’s CR, but just say the NHS lose this case as a result. They likely will be liable for more claims if DU continues to use the CR. So logically they may review the decision after the outcome of the tribunal to limit their liability for future claims. It’s also possible they appeal the decision.

What is the point of the law if organisations and individuals can just ignore it and get away with it.

You'd think at the very least Judges/ lawyers would realise this shitshow is a threat to their very existence.

Gassylady · 29/07/2025 18:58

tribunalObserver · 29/07/2025 14:19

I think the use of the P term may be quite community-specific. I'm also a bit older than Sandie and it wasn't used in the part of the country where I grew up, but in my early twenties I lived somewhere else where the term was used just as Sandie says, by everyone just like Aussie including by the people themselves, especially to refer to the P shop.

Absolutely this. I was born late 60s and this was totally normal usage when I was growing up. Interchangeable use of corner shop and p*ki shop. My Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani classmates also used the term. Lived in a relatively multicultural dock town

FedUpFeminist · 29/07/2025 19:03

Reminded me of a rape trial. Brutal.

saveforthat · 29/07/2025 19:03

I was just thinking about the sick jokes. They have always been around but before the internet they were shared verbally so untraceable and not so easy for many eyes to see them. I can still recall the sick jokes about Lesley Whittle, the poor woman who was kidnapped in the 1970s

thenoisiesttermagant · 29/07/2025 19:05

Gassylady · 29/07/2025 18:58

Absolutely this. I was born late 60s and this was totally normal usage when I was growing up. Interchangeable use of corner shop and p*ki shop. My Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani classmates also used the term. Lived in a relatively multicultural dock town

Possibly more classism at play then. In the naice rich communities (without any Pakistani people, no doubt) this wasn't a term that was used. SP did say the first shop she'd worked in the term was in the name of the shop.

Notably wealth / class is not a PC in the EA2010 - which makes sense as the EA2010 seems mainly a tool for rich people to punch down on poor people.

You can't go to court if you don't have extreme amounts of cash (as has been evidenced by the crowdfunders). JKR has commented on the classism at play here too.

J.K. Rowling on X:

TheHereticalOne · 29/07/2025 19:09

FeedbackProvider · 29/07/2025 18:16

The number is 13

Aha, a COVEN!

Needspaceforlego · 29/07/2025 19:09

Mollyollydolly · 29/07/2025 17:00

Couldn't agree more.

Helen Joyce: What a slog this has been for Sandie. If anyone wonders why more women don't speak up, you only have to think of the near-literal witch trial that follows. How many more women will have to subject themselves to character assassination before we get our rights?

Edited

So true, no wonder other women at Fife wouldn't come forward.

And at the end of the day, it feels like they have just tried to dirty her name to discourage others coming forward.

DrPrunesqualer · 29/07/2025 19:10

Charabanc · 29/07/2025 18:56

Here are the quotes:

LN I have no idea. I would hope so but is 7 yrs worth
NC There's evidence in this chat isnt there, that [no sound but NC may be looking for page] Turn please to p1709. This is a 1:1 chat betwn u and Gina
Yes
NC Gina says Sandra is pissing me off. She's been texting for a pic
of the weirdo but sent a pic of me back. Gina is annoyed w Sandie.
Yes
NC She'd asked the wrong person. But her husband was having a difficult time due to personal issues
LN I dont know abou tthe [muted] birthday
NC Gina had a had a few drinks at this point

LM - Gina likes to have a drink. Didn't know she was drunk.

(My mistake, it was Gina likes to have a drink. No "classic Mumsnet style", just a direct quote.)

They're on this page:

www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5381518-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-45?page=20

Edited

classic mumsnet comment wasn’t a criticism

Gina username on the thread too.. another classic mumsnet style bit of fun

prh47bridge · 29/07/2025 19:12

tribunalObserver · 29/07/2025 18:31

What's the likely route for her to be in trouble with the BSB? My only awareness is that is gc barristers saying they've been maliciously reported, I think. I assume - surely? - it's not something for the non-legally trained among us to have any role in. Is it likely NC would report her, or Judge Kemp?

Anyone can report a barrister if they have concerns. There is an online form at Online reporting form for questions and concerns.

Online reporting form for questions and concerns

https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/online-reporting-form.html

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread