From TT
Judge and Panel arrived. We begin.
JR speaking - cannot hear.
JR - we have a couple of matters, there's a proposed short written intervention from <missed> we'd like to include.
JR - heard from C last night, 2 new witnesses who came forward over the w/end, we object in principle. Want to know what they have to say, very late.
JR - 3,000 new pages, it seems unreasonable given that subs start tomorrow.
JR - 4th, discussing availability for subs some time in August and travel arrangements for Thursday.
NC - arguing in favour of adding further witnesses, thats what JR said about LN, FW today when added at late date. Tribunal has been reluctant to curtail Rs activity to defend action. Rs have been shambolic in how they conducted, the need for FW, LN should have been easy for Rs to anticipate, it should not have been diff for them to expect her to dispute.
It can some as no surprise that SP denies she is racist.
Fifer : stick that in yer pipe and smoke it pal
If Rs had proceeded, they would have i/w FW in relation to Xmas eve incident. They could have i/w her in that i/x. That should have lead them to LN, and we would have been in a very diff position. I/w note for both wits would have been in bundle, and the additional docs now would have already been in the bundle, pages 1705-1712, messages from Benidorm Party Chat (?), text messages, the C would have been able to give evidence in chief on those and x'd
Fifer : oft. Ah hink JR is gettin a skuddit lug here aka a Fife FAFO.