Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #33

1000 replies

nauticant · 19/07/2025 21:05

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.
Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32

OP posts:
Thread gallery
47
Waitwhat23 · 20/07/2025 09:49

I'm thinking of poor Nauticant, who's probably sitting at her breakfast table, eating her weetabix disconsolently, thinking 'I thought I'd get the weekend off but those fuckers are still going'.

Sorry Nauticant!

Szygy · 20/07/2025 09:51

Waitwhat23 · 20/07/2025 09:49

I'm thinking of poor Nauticant, who's probably sitting at her breakfast table, eating her weetabix disconsolently, thinking 'I thought I'd get the weekend off but those fuckers are still going'.

Sorry Nauticant!

I woke up at 3am and felt compelled to read some of this thread (actually, the last few pages of the previous one) in a doomed bid to keep on top of it.

LoudlyProudlyHorrid · 20/07/2025 09:53

Justabaker · 20/07/2025 09:06

The damn broke in February when one of the Scottish papers said 'we will not use female pronouns for Dr U'. It was a trickle, then a flood.
This is how preference cascades is created.
A preference cascade is a social phenomenon where people rapidly shift from privately held beliefs or opinions to publicly expressing them, often triggered by a critical mass of individuals openly revealing their true preferences. This happens when individuals realize that their previously suppressed views are more widely shared than they thought, leading to a sudden and widespread change in public behavior or opinion. It’s often seen in political or cultural shifts, like the fall of authoritarian regimes or sudden changes in social norms.

I love what I learn in the course of reading these threads. This also leads me to preference falsification, which I'm sure has been discussed before and must surely also be going on in this case.

The stress and incredulity of reading these threads also nearly led me to some retail therapy in the shape of buying a tent from one of the ads. I do not need yet another tent.

Needspaceforlego · 20/07/2025 09:55

Rightsraptor · 20/07/2025 09:27

@Lougle - but surely Sandie isn't full time if her normal working pattern is weekend nights only? So she could be short, or getting close to it, on clinical hours after 18 months of this nonsense.

You're correct about all this process, of course, and it's an aspect I hadn't thought about.

She was back at work for a spell in 2024 before going off with stress during the trial.

I just hope she gets some decent compensation out of this

rebmacesrevda · 20/07/2025 09:55

LoudlyProudlyHorrid · 20/07/2025 09:53

I love what I learn in the course of reading these threads. This also leads me to preference falsification, which I'm sure has been discussed before and must surely also be going on in this case.

The stress and incredulity of reading these threads also nearly led me to some retail therapy in the shape of buying a tent from one of the ads. I do not need yet another tent.

Edited

Presumably the ads are showing you tents because you've already bought a tent. I never understand that logic!

NebulousDog · 20/07/2025 09:55

So it looks as if Kate Searle and Jim Borwick are going to be quizzed on Tuesday.

" Ms Peggie's legal team sought an order for Dr Upton's phone to be inspected by forensic expert Jim Borwick. However, this was rejected by the tribunal.
They wanted to discover the date and time the notes were created and when they were edited."

So I suppose NC will ask him about what an examination of a mobile phone might show, with comments "well, we'll never know because we weren't allowed to look".

That new bundle must be quite the read (If I were a journo I think I know what I'd be doing on Monday morning).

Is NC allowed to re-examine Upton.

Charabanc · 20/07/2025 09:56

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 20/07/2025 09:47

Archive of the herald story that states dr Upton had kept notes on issues with other staff members at a previous placement.

archive.ph/ouEIm

This is interesting, from that piece:

Ms Peggie's legal team sought an order for Dr Upton's phone to be inspected by forensic expert Jim Borwick. However, this was rejected by the tribunal.
They wanted to discover the date and time the notes were created and when they were edited.
Mr Borwick is due to give evidence on Tuesday.

As I suspected, they're going to be looking at the metadata in Upton's phone, to see when the notes were actually made. Not when he says he made them.

Charabanc · 20/07/2025 09:57

NebulousDog · 20/07/2025 09:55

So it looks as if Kate Searle and Jim Borwick are going to be quizzed on Tuesday.

" Ms Peggie's legal team sought an order for Dr Upton's phone to be inspected by forensic expert Jim Borwick. However, this was rejected by the tribunal.
They wanted to discover the date and time the notes were created and when they were edited."

So I suppose NC will ask him about what an examination of a mobile phone might show, with comments "well, we'll never know because we weren't allowed to look".

That new bundle must be quite the read (If I were a journo I think I know what I'd be doing on Monday morning).

Is NC allowed to re-examine Upton.

They have his phone.

Brainworm · 20/07/2025 09:58

rebmacesrevda · 20/07/2025 08:52

@peakedtraybake
The drama with the info commissioner is the best bit for me. It's just so absurd and unprofessional of them. He, quite rightly, ordered them to release data they were legally required to release and had been avoiding releasing. They threw a strop and called him "emotional", in a message which then got leaked via their own sheer incompetence. They then release a public statement in which they lie about the whole thing. What the hell is wrong with them? It's hilarious.

It is straight out of a Thick of It episode.

For those who have missed this part - FOIs were submitted to NHSF asking how much the legal costs had amounted to, so far. NHSF didn’t provide the info, stating they didn’t have it. Objections to this response were raised with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) who, on 28 May, told NHSF they needed to look harder and find the info. They produced the costs on the 9th July.

On 4th July an internal memo was produced about the ICO decision to force them to published information about costs in which the IC was described as ‘whinging’, ‘emotional’, and ‘unprofessional’. Sometime between the memo being written and the 10th July, it accidentally got included in a new/different FOI response. When NHSF became aware of this error, they had to report it to the IC🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Fast forward (only a matter of days) and they again called the IC ‘emotional’ in response to his statement about NHSF’s press release on Friday.

Needspaceforlego · 20/07/2025 09:59

Largesso · 20/07/2025 09:28

Whilst I am very pleased and grateful that SP is suing RCN, and I feel such empathetic stress for the fact they didn’t support her I’m also quite glad they didn’t. If they had come on board they would probably have advised her to accept the beating stoically. At the very least they would not have recommended she seek out Sex Matters as her MSP did. They would have been unlikely to recommend taking it to ET given their flavour and even if they had would have been unlikely to have appointed her current solicitor and advocate.

Yes in some ways thats been a blessing. But go Sandie get a claim into them too.

This isnt going to stop at just Fife. Surely we need a public enquiry into how Men have been allowed free access into Sss all over the country.

Coffeebeforework · 20/07/2025 09:59

Hello. Long time lurker here from north of the border. Ex nurse and DH is a nurse so we have been following the Fife case closely. DH is so appalled by the RCN's behaviour/inaction that he is resigning his membership. Am in such awe of Sandie Peggie. Just wanted to say thank you to all the amazing informed posters. Very much enjoyed the Fife commentary too! Very pleased to have some AL this coming week!😀

Ereshkigalangcleg · 20/07/2025 09:59

Ooh I’m completely free on Tuesday so can follow “contemporaneously” as it were, via these threads and Twitter.

SternlyMatthews · 20/07/2025 10:00

Needspaceforlego · 20/07/2025 09:15

WTF- I'll go do some research on that one.

I too thought it was a joke about her riding through London

John Russell was indeed Prime Minister 1846-1852, as the Irish starved during 'The Famine' due to laissez faire economics. The poor could only afford potatoes, which failed, while Ireland was a net exporter of other foodstuffs.

anyolddinosaur · 20/07/2025 10:02

Someone (?nauticant) commented a very long way back that everyone knows a nurse. Then there is the small women v the large man, older working class v new employee and very privileged individual and a monolithic machine. Despite the claims to be the "most marginalised" it's pretty clear who is the less privileged and its a national characteristic to love the underdog. Add in the level of incompetence and it's interesting to a lot of people. Scottish press did a good job early on and the national press realised the level of interest.

Brainworm · 20/07/2025 10:02

Charabanc · 20/07/2025 09:57

They have his phone.

I read somewhere that the request to compel wasn’t upheld but DU chose to hand it over anyway?

Charabanc · 20/07/2025 10:02

Coffeebeforework · 20/07/2025 09:59

Hello. Long time lurker here from north of the border. Ex nurse and DH is a nurse so we have been following the Fife case closely. DH is so appalled by the RCN's behaviour/inaction that he is resigning his membership. Am in such awe of Sandie Peggie. Just wanted to say thank you to all the amazing informed posters. Very much enjoyed the Fife commentary too! Very pleased to have some AL this coming week!😀

I hope he's telling them why!

Can't wait for the RCN legal fun...

Nameychangington · 20/07/2025 10:03

guinnessguzzler · 20/07/2025 09:26

Agree @Taytoface re: media interest. Any public body will tell anyone who'll listen that the media love to hate them. I remember this being a stated part of the induction when I was (very briefly) employed by City of Edinburgh Council. I think it is the combination of complete incompetence to the point of hilarity mixed with total arrogance that has really set them off. For years the media has been fed the li(n)e that trans people are the underdog and it is now clear that really hasn't been the case at all.

Meanwhile it has only just occurred to me that there must be lots of jobs where your sex is mostly irrelevant, ie no changing rooms, no specific uniform, no potential for service users / clients / patients to request same sex provision, even roles where you mainly wfh and simply use your own toilets, so it's quite interesting that Dr U found himself in a job where sex actually is something that can become relevant quite quickly. I appreciate he trained before transitioning but I do wonder a bit. In the same vein, Midrul Wadhwa could have honed in on any area of the voluntary sector yet somehow ended up in the one bit where it might have led to some controversy. I'm not quite suggesting it's deliberate but I do wonder if there is a subconscious draw there.

It's a feature, not a bug. How are you a woman, if others aren't validating you as one? They have to use women's spaces (and the women in them) , like changing rooms or rape crisis services, to prove they are women and to force others to agree that they are women.

You see it sometimes in the discussion around toilets, we see it as a safety, privacy and dignity aspect, and they don't at all, they see denying transwomen access as women being mean, exclusionary, phobic. Because we don't use the single sex spaces for the same reasons. You can see it in Upton's evidence , he saw SP being in the changing room as her deliberately seeking him out in a woman space for a confrontation. It had not occurred to him that she might need to be there or why - because she needed to change her sanitary protection - because he sees the women's space as an opportunity for validation, not as something needed for practical reasons.

Needspaceforlego · 20/07/2025 10:03

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 20/07/2025 09:47

Archive of the herald story that states dr Upton had kept notes on issues with other staff members at a previous placement.

archive.ph/ouEIm

That might explain why management appear to be shit scared of him.

Conxis · 20/07/2025 10:05

RedToothBrush · 20/07/2025 09:02

All these organisations that have come out saying the SC is wrong and they are going to ignore the ruling would do well to notice what is happening in this court case because if they decide to ignore the law, adopt non policy policies and engage in targeting GC staff to defend their position then this might not be the last farce to face court.

Organisations have tiptoed around trans people, afraid of being labelled transphobic and having discrimination claims against them.
I really hope this case makes these organisations equally as afraid of women! The publicity this is getting should make them very afraid the might discriminate against us and they WILL end up in court with all the negative publicity NHS Fife is currently getting!

FannyCann · 20/07/2025 10:06

Justabaker · 20/07/2025 06:39

Good morning and Happy Sunday.

I thought I would share this with all of you, just for the giggle.

Thank you @nauticant and I hope you had a good night's sleep.

www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/barrister-gallops-through-london-celebrate-becoming-kc

I’m sure Jupiter is a very nice horse but his appearance is somewhat unimpressive. And JR’s boots could do with a good polish.
She should have borrowed a cavalry charger for the job. Or a nice dressage stallion.

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #33
NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #33
NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #33
KittyWilkinson · 20/07/2025 10:06

Would Sandie be in a Final Salary pension scheme? Reduced hours etc. would surely affect her pension when she retires?
Edited to add. I see it was referred to upthread, so it would. You are all too fast for me!

rebmacesrevda · 20/07/2025 10:07

@Brainworm

Where's Malcolm Tucker when you need him? He'd have these halfwits sorted out by lunchtime!

Nameychangington · 20/07/2025 10:07

Needspaceforlego · 20/07/2025 10:03

That might explain why management appear to be shit scared of him.

I really hope that one of the RNs newly appeared on the witness list is someone else Upton made notes on, either in this rotation or a previous one, and that their addition is because of what was found on his phone.

TwiceForLunch · 20/07/2025 10:07

Charabanc · 20/07/2025 09:56

This is interesting, from that piece:

Ms Peggie's legal team sought an order for Dr Upton's phone to be inspected by forensic expert Jim Borwick. However, this was rejected by the tribunal.
They wanted to discover the date and time the notes were created and when they were edited.
Mr Borwick is due to give evidence on Tuesday.

As I suspected, they're going to be looking at the metadata in Upton's phone, to see when the notes were actually made. Not when he says he made them.

So - that piece says that DU made certain specific allegations about SP's conduct with regards to patient safety and then apparently backtracked and said they were 'potential' issues that may arise? In other words he just flat out lied? Is that what I am reading? Or have I misunderstood? (Not unlikely).

Coffeebeforework · 20/07/2025 10:08

Yes, Charabanc he very much did!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.