As usual I am well behind, but just adding from Fife Today:
[NHS Fife's statement] quickly became a PR car crash as politicians, commentators and a number of groups all responded with sharp criticism.
David Hamilton, Scotland’s Information Commissioner, attacked its “petulant tone” and said he would investigate whether it amounted to contempt in relation to assurances given to him regarding Freedom of Information (FOI) compliance. He said: “The petulant tone of NHS Fife’s latest statement is quite remarkable, but it is the content that concerns me most.”
An attack on Sex Matters - the campaign group which is supporting Ms Peggie’s case - also backfired.
While the board said it was restricted in what it can and cannot say publicly, its first statement singled out the group for criticism, suggesting it had “steered public opinion” - in the same paragraph it highlighted "unacceptable personal attacks and trolling on social media" with a threat of physical harm and sexual violence leading to police involvement.
The amended statement said: “ To be clear NHS Fife is not seeking to suggest that anyone involved with Sex Matters have contributed to the behaviour or issues mentioned above.”
A health board spokesperson said: “The section of our previously issued statement relating to the involvement of Sex Matters in the case has been removed. This decision was made following discussion with the claimant’s legal team. This should allow the tribunal to proceed as per the original schedule when it resumes on Monday.”
Maya Forrester (sic), chief executive of Sex Matters, described the statement as an “extraordinary intervention - even by the board’s standards” and added: “NHS Fife has dug itself into a reputational black hole. If the only way forward the board can see is to lash out, criticising Sex Matters, which has, at all times acted with proprietary and in pursuit of its charitable objectives, that suggests desperation.”
My bold.