It’s really interesting that at no point does Jack say he is a woman (which is the justification TIMs usually give for using women’s spaces). He says he uses men’s facilities if he has men’s clothes on and women’s facilities if he has his frock and make-up on.
I mean- what? That has nothing to do with the SC ruling anyway. As far as I’m aware there has never been a law or guidance in the UK saying which toilets people should use according to what they’re wearing.
If we were going to base provisions on clothing, most women would be using the men’s as so many of us wear trousers on a day to day basis.
Jack says he is trans but I think he actually just means ‘I like wearing a range of different clothes’.