Interesting that in its continued coverage of the SC judgement, the Guardian has another story about some poor marginalised soul who is being denied the most basic of human rights - the right to pee (in the opposite sex toilets).
I wonder why they haven't reported on the fact that Adam Graham, AKA Isla Bryson, has said he is pleased that Victoria McCloud is challenging the ruling at the ECtHR, because it helps his case to be be put back in a women's prison. Why doesn't the Guardian focus on this aspect of the SC ruling 🤔