I agree with you that it's ugly, but I disagree with you that it's to do with 'wokeness' and 'gender identity'.
One of the positive things I said about the design of the window in my very first post on the subject was that I appreciated that it actually highlighted lesbians and gays, because it was lesbians and gays who campaigned for rights for same-sex attracted men and women.
That was back in the days when people were actually discriminated against - and suffered violence because of - their sexual orientation. 'Gender identity' as a thing hadn't been invented back then. I don't think 'woke' was a thing back then either.
So the window celebrates - garishly, I agree - the struggle of women and men who had to fight against actual discrimination, and just wanted the same rights as anyone else. They weren't fighting for any special treatment or extra rights, just the same as everyone else, and thankfully, in these parts of the world, we mostly have them. That's worth celebrating.
Obviously there are many parts of the world where being lesbian or gay is dangerous to the point of death, so we bear that in mind as we mark what we have achieved here.
It's not gender identity, and it's not wokeness, so I think you're misreading the historical context of the window.