In which case, I do have a question but I appreciate it's probably a bit of a derail because it's not necessarily a question for the OP (because I don't know if the OP feels this way too) and I've appreciated how respectful you have been to the OP in not taking over this thread.
I'll ask my question anyway and will put it to the OP in the first instance, given it's the OP's AMA...
"If you are a TW who doesn't believe that 'we all have a gender identity', how do you make sense of your decision to transition i.e. if you don't feel like you've got the gendered soul of a woman, why do you think it resolves feelings of discomfort about yourself to have changed your body to resemble a woman's body (within the limits of surgical/hormonal possibility)?"
OP, please ignore my question if this doesn't apply to you. Troubled, I would be genuinely interested in your thoughts if the OP is happy that it's not a derail on this thread.
To expand upon my "I find it bizarre" statement and pick up on your point about a pragmatic approach to resolving dysphoria....
I'm not sure I understand why it's pragmatic. I'm not against medical transition for people who a) are over 25 (after the shift in amygdala versus frontal lobe thinking) b) have been through a very rigorous, neutral support pathway, which rules out and seeks to address every possible reason for the dysphoria (I'm not convinced this pathway exists currently, particularly in relation to autism) and c) fully understand the significant risks and known impact of their decision about their body.
However, I've got no decent answer for the very valid counter argument that it makes as much sense to support this as it does to medically support an anorexic person to stay thin or to amputate the leg of someone who feels dysphoria relating to it.
All I've got on that is that belief is very powerful: 2 billion Christians believe that it's possible for a virgin to give birth and that conception of a child can happen without sperm. I don't. But my lack of belief has no impact on their belief that there is an exception to what we know about biology and reproduction.
I wouldn't support anorexics or amputee-wannabes being medically supported in a way that enable their belief to be enacted on their body. Nor do I support situations where parents refuse life-saving medical care for their children because of their religious beliefs. But belief remains very powerful and it's a reality that it has to be accommodated in some medical treatment decisions.
But if a TW doesn't actually believe "I'm a woman because I've got a woman's soul", why is transition a pragmatic solution to dysphoria?
(I will say at this juncture that I'm reading this thread in good faith... I'm cautiously optimistic that it won't go the same way as another one I was on a while ago now where it gradually edged its way towards increasingly less ambiguous comments before turning into a full-blown fantasy about nurses in female prisons 🤮 To cap it all off, I got told by one particularly cross poster that I was to blame for the behaviour of the TW in question because I had been interacting politely - I pointed out that I didn't own MN or the internet, but to no avail. FFS 😂)