Stepping carefully away from my strong emotional response to that article and that poor woman,
Isn't it interesting how here's another case in another hospital a long way from the Peggie situation.
It's the same basic problem of a man's right to be present while non consenting women undress.
The man again turns out to be behaving in distinctly questionable ways.
The women are again punished and repressed by the authorities and management involved for in any way attempting to resist or protest this man's behaviour.
The management yet again appear to have taken the man's side entirely without the faintest attempt at 'balancing needs' or showing any respect for their woman employees, never mind an equality of respect and care.
The pattern is a bit hard to miss. Considering how few of these men there are, its remarkable that two cases are in progress with such similarities.
And in this case, they tried to coerce the woman to submit to having her vagina exposed on an operating table in the presence of the man who had been harassing her, and who she was involved in legal procedings with. Under threat of losing her surgery if she did not submit to being so exposed to him. It is almost as if the trust felt entitled to validate this man's self expression by providing women's bodies to him.
Words just fail.
When some idiot is wittering about 'be kind' and how terribly sad these poor men are, this is what they are enabling to happen to women.