Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trump announces executive order that says legally there are only 2 genders (hmmm did he mis-speak and meant sex?)

1000 replies

IwantToRetire · 20/01/2025 17:39

Well this will add to the confusion.

Have just heard him use the word gender, even though earlier news reports had said he would say only 2 sexes.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-sign-order-proclaiming-only-160700963.html

Trump to sign order proclaiming there are only two sexes

Donald Trump's government is set to recognise only two genders, male and female. The move will come as part of a swathe of executive orders the incoming president will sign on his first day back in the White House. It is one of two branded as "common...

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/trump-sign-order-proclaiming-only-160700963.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
TempestTost · 22/01/2025 10:42

Princessconsuelabananahammock9 · 22/01/2025 04:13

How does one discuss race but not critical race theory? Especially in the US?

Discuss race but not racism?

Do you think racism doesn't exist? And that discussing it means white people are harmed?

Critical race theory is a particular lens to talk about race, a highly theoretical and controversial lens originating in universities that is wholly and utterly inappropriate for children.

One of the tactics that has been used frequently by I'd pol types in this is to convince people that ideas like CRT just mean "talking about racism" and are, and have always been, the only way to be non-racist.

It's not, it never has been, and it's not even particularly popular among non-white Americans.

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:49

lechiffre55 · 22/01/2025 10:36

You appear to me to be totally at the mercy of your out of control emotions.
You are in such a tizz you seem unable even hear the other side.

Are you hearing the other side? Or is it only people who don’t agree with you who appear to out of control of their emotions?

lechiffre55 · 22/01/2025 10:50

500 women compete in a hypothetical marathon. Of those 500 "women" three are males. The male "women" constitute 0.6% of the competitors. Less than 1%.
The three males take 1st 2nd and 3rd places. On the winners' podium it's the three males and no women.
you : "Why are you concerned by such a tiny percentage of males in the race?"

TempestTost · 22/01/2025 10:52

TheCourseOfTheRiverChanged · 22/01/2025 03:53

This thread is also morbidly fascinating, to see self-identified left wingers describing free trade as a very good thing, and the reintroduction of manufacturing in the USA as a very bad thing.
I wonder if Vance's plans to increase the federal minimum wage will be reframed as a facist plot to reward the bigoted, backwards working poor for being so bigoted and backwards?

Oh my gosh, thank you for saying this.

I find this the most bizarre element of the whole thing really, in a way more so than the gender stuff, at least that, I feel I can see how that emerged.

I used to very much identify with the economic left. Not the big state social intervention left, the good jobs strong communities, protecting workers, localism/conservation, cooperative industry, left.

Of course there have always been the big state people, but when suddenly people screaming about how the left is about supporting globalism, free trade, and control of economic policy by international trade organizations, my eyes nearly popped out of my head.

Increasingly I think it's not just that elements of the left and right have shifted, they actually seem to have substantially flipped, on basic issues. People who are old school leftists aren't supporting the right now because things have become muddled, it's because that's where you find the policies they have always supported.

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:55

lechiffre55 · 22/01/2025 10:50

500 women compete in a hypothetical marathon. Of those 500 "women" three are males. The male "women" constitute 0.6% of the competitors. Less than 1%.
The three males take 1st 2nd and 3rd places. On the winners' podium it's the three males and no women.
you : "Why are you concerned by such a tiny percentage of males in the race?"

Edited

I think I’ve outlined earlier that I don’t agree with transpeople in women’s sports or in women’s private spaces. yet I’m being accused of “not hearing the other side” 🤷‍♀️

what I’ve said is that if that’s all it was about you could make targeted legislation to end these practices. That’s not what trump has done. He’s launched an attack on the very existence of the trans community. Much like it seems several people on here want.

what would be the ideal way for you for Trans people to exist? How would you suggest for them to be part of society without discrimination and persecution? Can you see that at all or is it rather, as trump thinks, that they shouldn’t exist at all?

Ingenieur · 22/01/2025 10:56

Another of Trump's EOs made a recommendation for government buildings to be in traditional architectural styles.

If every person you don't like is Hitler, and the things they like are all fascist, you are going to lose the war of ideas because you'll have abandoned all the worthwhile things like beautiful architecture to your enemies. The more people grumble about Trump being a Nazi and this executive order being fascist, the more people see classical architecture in general as fascist, the more people see beauty as a fascist ideal, and the more people will be drawn to fascism because you've made it beautiful.

The idea that we need to pick sides and subject ourselves to purity tests on every issue is adolescent nonsense. Childlike in its naivety.

Sex is real, gender is un-provalble guff. If the Left abandons reality, then reality becomes an ideal of the Right and people will follow. If the modern Left had a sane take on this issue it wouldn't be a polarising issue.

TempestTost · 22/01/2025 10:58

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:24

I do get it. Trump is good news for white women whose only cause is feminism and who do not care about the rights of other groups such as trans, lgbt, people of colour, poor people or indeed the climate or human rights of peoples in other countries.

Tump has been the most popular Republican president among "people of colour" since Nixon. He has record support from both black and Hispanic voters.

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:02

TempestTost · 22/01/2025 10:52

Oh my gosh, thank you for saying this.

I find this the most bizarre element of the whole thing really, in a way more so than the gender stuff, at least that, I feel I can see how that emerged.

I used to very much identify with the economic left. Not the big state social intervention left, the good jobs strong communities, protecting workers, localism/conservation, cooperative industry, left.

Of course there have always been the big state people, but when suddenly people screaming about how the left is about supporting globalism, free trade, and control of economic policy by international trade organizations, my eyes nearly popped out of my head.

Increasingly I think it's not just that elements of the left and right have shifted, they actually seem to have substantially flipped, on basic issues. People who are old school leftists aren't supporting the right now because things have become muddled, it's because that's where you find the policies they have always supported.

first of all, the left is a lot of thing. Lots of left wing groups including the Labour party and all major European left wing parities consider free trade (with restrictions and regulations) a very positive thing. Nothing weird in that. Free trade helps prevent international conflicts as well, as you’d recall that was part of the original idea of the EU - we won’t go to wars with people we trade with. Yes, some far left fractions have been anti-globalization traditionally but none of the Northern European left has been, and personally I’ve never subscribed to that view. You can be left wing without being a Marxist, you know.

on manufacturing in the US, I don’t think it’s per se a bad thing, but it is a and thing if it’s going to happens, as Trump envisions, as part of increasing isolationism and trade wars.

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:03

TempestTost · 22/01/2025 10:58

Tump has been the most popular Republican president among "people of colour" since Nixon. He has record support from both black and Hispanic voters.

Record for a party who has very bad records with these groups. Most people of colour still vote democrat

lechiffre55 · 22/01/2025 11:04

TempestTost · 22/01/2025 10:52

Oh my gosh, thank you for saying this.

I find this the most bizarre element of the whole thing really, in a way more so than the gender stuff, at least that, I feel I can see how that emerged.

I used to very much identify with the economic left. Not the big state social intervention left, the good jobs strong communities, protecting workers, localism/conservation, cooperative industry, left.

Of course there have always been the big state people, but when suddenly people screaming about how the left is about supporting globalism, free trade, and control of economic policy by international trade organizations, my eyes nearly popped out of my head.

Increasingly I think it's not just that elements of the left and right have shifted, they actually seem to have substantially flipped, on basic issues. People who are old school leftists aren't supporting the right now because things have become muddled, it's because that's where you find the policies they have always supported.

Yes.
Another example free speech. There are so many historical examples going back for so long where the conservative/right wing view was pro censorship. Now that has flipped completely. The left fought tooth and nail for free speech back then. Now the right stand for free speech and the left wants censorship. It's very strange for to someone who remembers how things used to be :

ACLU's Ira Glasser defense of the rights of neo-Nazis to rally in the Chicago suburb of Skokie, Illinois in the 1970s.

Mary Whitehouse in the UK triyng to censor anything on UK TV that she found offensive.

Senator Joe Lieberman in 1993 Saying He Would Like To Ban Video Games

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:04

Ingenieur · 22/01/2025 10:56

Another of Trump's EOs made a recommendation for government buildings to be in traditional architectural styles.

If every person you don't like is Hitler, and the things they like are all fascist, you are going to lose the war of ideas because you'll have abandoned all the worthwhile things like beautiful architecture to your enemies. The more people grumble about Trump being a Nazi and this executive order being fascist, the more people see classical architecture in general as fascist, the more people see beauty as a fascist ideal, and the more people will be drawn to fascism because you've made it beautiful.

The idea that we need to pick sides and subject ourselves to purity tests on every issue is adolescent nonsense. Childlike in its naivety.

Sex is real, gender is un-provalble guff. If the Left abandons reality, then reality becomes an ideal of the Right and people will follow. If the modern Left had a sane take on this issue it wouldn't be a polarising issue.

Because only traditional architecture is beautiful? 😅 if that isn’t a reactionary view don’t know what is

EasternStandard · 22/01/2025 11:06

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:55

I think I’ve outlined earlier that I don’t agree with transpeople in women’s sports or in women’s private spaces. yet I’m being accused of “not hearing the other side” 🤷‍♀️

what I’ve said is that if that’s all it was about you could make targeted legislation to end these practices. That’s not what trump has done. He’s launched an attack on the very existence of the trans community. Much like it seems several people on here want.

what would be the ideal way for you for Trans people to exist? How would you suggest for them to be part of society without discrimination and persecution? Can you see that at all or is it rather, as trump thinks, that they shouldn’t exist at all?

Since you’re asking I’d say we have made an error as a society and should have progressed to include all types of representation in each sex class rather than creating gender ideology

So no idea of ‘transition’ just people with immutable sex presenting as they wish

The male sex class in particular needs to be more accommodating

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:06

lechiffre55 · 22/01/2025 11:04

Yes.
Another example free speech. There are so many historical examples going back for so long where the conservative/right wing view was pro censorship. Now that has flipped completely. The left fought tooth and nail for free speech back then. Now the right stand for free speech and the left wants censorship. It's very strange for to someone who remembers how things used to be :

ACLU's Ira Glasser defense of the rights of neo-Nazis to rally in the Chicago suburb of Skokie, Illinois in the 1970s.

Mary Whitehouse in the UK triyng to censor anything on UK TV that she found offensive.

Senator Joe Lieberman in 1993 Saying He Would Like To Ban Video Games

I agree that the left has gone too far on their censorship. So has the right. As Margaret Atwood has said, in the end there will only be books left about cooking with parsley

MarieDeGournay · 22/01/2025 11:07

leftorrightnow what would be the ideal way for you for Trans people to exist? How would you suggest for them to be part of society without discrimination and persecution?

There you go, around on your circular track again! You have failed to show how trans people are subject to 'discrimination and persecution', in fact they have somehow wielded extraordinary and disproportionate power to effect changes in the law, medicine, education, the media, language etc.

But round and round you go, never stopping to take on board anything that shakes your preconceptions.

OverThinkingAnja · 22/01/2025 11:20

@leftorrightnow

I think I’ve outlined earlier that I don’t agree with transpeople in women’s sports or in women’s private spaces. yet I’m being accused of “not hearing the other side” 🤷‍♀️
what I’ve said is that if that’s all it was about you could make targeted legislation to end these practices.

How without first acknowledging somewhere in law that transwomen are male? Otherwise you are just discriminating against some women without really explaining why.

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:23

OverThinkingAnja · 22/01/2025 11:20

@leftorrightnow

I think I’ve outlined earlier that I don’t agree with transpeople in women’s sports or in women’s private spaces. yet I’m being accused of “not hearing the other side” 🤷‍♀️
what I’ve said is that if that’s all it was about you could make targeted legislation to end these practices.

How without first acknowledging somewhere in law that transwomen are male? Otherwise you are just discriminating against some women without really explaining why.

Que? Of course by acknowledging transpeople as their own category

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:25

MarieDeGournay · 22/01/2025 11:07

leftorrightnow what would be the ideal way for you for Trans people to exist? How would you suggest for them to be part of society without discrimination and persecution?

There you go, around on your circular track again! You have failed to show how trans people are subject to 'discrimination and persecution', in fact they have somehow wielded extraordinary and disproportionate power to effect changes in the law, medicine, education, the media, language etc.

But round and round you go, never stopping to take on board anything that shakes your preconceptions.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/624011/transgender-hate-crimes-in-england-and-wales-by-offence-type/#:~:text=Number%20of%20transgender%20hate%20crimes%20in%20England%20and%20Wales%202011%2D2024&text=The%20number%20of%20hate%20crimes,4%2C780%20offences%20in%202023%2F24.

Tomatotater · 22/01/2025 11:26

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:03

Eh? I was talking about transpeople as a marginalized group

They aren't a marginalised group. They have managed, in 10 years to infiltrate public bodies almost immediately and gain huge rights and concessions , rights women spent decades fighting for. Almost as if the people who run these institutions- middle class, middle aged White privileged men recognise something in them that they can't quite get when it comes to women. I wonder what it is?

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:29

EasternStandard · 22/01/2025 11:06

Since you’re asking I’d say we have made an error as a society and should have progressed to include all types of representation in each sex class rather than creating gender ideology

So no idea of ‘transition’ just people with immutable sex presenting as they wish

The male sex class in particular needs to be more accommodating

Well I can only agree w that, but since we’re not seeing any signs of a society with less rigid gender roles and characteristics emerging any time soon, what do we do to protect the transgender people right now?

OverThinkingAnja · 22/01/2025 11:35

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:23

Que? Of course by acknowledging transpeople as their own category

You’re suggesting legislation that restricts access of members of one sex to the services, spaces and/or sports of the other. Are you suggesting acknowledging them as a third sex? It’s unclear what you’re acknowledging them as which would restrict access

Ingenieur · 22/01/2025 11:37

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 11:04

Because only traditional architecture is beautiful? 😅 if that isn’t a reactionary view don’t know what is

Terrible reading comprehension. I see you're keen to continue acting as the pigeon in this chess game.

EasternStandard · 22/01/2025 11:38

We can’t get closer to this better society by continually progressing gender ideology

Instead people need to focus their attention on the barrier - the male sex class. Not women and girls.

Maybe start talking to men about what they can do

Datun · 22/01/2025 11:43

The importance you attach to the trans issue shows a lack of perspective. It’s completely out if proportion to it’s (sic) significance in the real world

I wonder which sex it is quite comfortable with the entire denial of the needs of female biology. Or that biology even exists!

And not only which sex is disadvantaged by it but which sex has the power to do it.

They aren't a marginalised group. They have managed, in 10 years to infiltrate public bodies almost immediately and gain huge rights and concessions

Quite. When women are being prevented, across the board, from anything female only, including language, it takes some fucked up thinking to think that the people who are doing it are the ones who are marginalised!!

It's risible. And, I have to say, a little bit weird

Shortshriftandlethal · 22/01/2025 12:02

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:15

The importance you attach to the trans issue shows a lack of perspective. It’s completely out if proportion to it’s significance in the real world.

however there are some people who benefit from this preoccupation with trans issues. And that’s the entire reactionary right wing, with all its other traditional values of unequal gender roles, nationalism, climate denying (drill, baby drill and let’s leave the Paris climate accord) and geopolitical competition. If you’re comfortable supporting those tendencies in society you’re on the right track. This is a values/culture war and yes, sadly, you have to choose sides. We’re seeing a global trend of isolationism and reactionary values, it’s now coming from both US, Russia (another trans hating country) and China. Only Europe is left in defence of liberal progressive values, and sadly, forces within our societies, aided by foreign interference (Elon, Putin) is also dividing our societies from within. There’s no natu law that history always moves forward and right now, seems a lot of people would like to see it move backwards so they can reclaim their privileges lost through too much “imagined”. (Yes that’s where you really outed your classist supremacist views) equality.

In case you haven't noticed this is the board for discussions around sex and gender and women's rights issues more generally. Trans ideology runs counter to the dignity and integrity of women and girls ,and it puts children in extremely compromised situations in which they are vulnerable to medications and surgeries that will do damage to their bodies. Many of us are also parents.... and some are professionals who work with children.

Shortshriftandlethal · 22/01/2025 12:13

leftorrightnow · 22/01/2025 10:15

The importance you attach to the trans issue shows a lack of perspective. It’s completely out if proportion to it’s significance in the real world.

however there are some people who benefit from this preoccupation with trans issues. And that’s the entire reactionary right wing, with all its other traditional values of unequal gender roles, nationalism, climate denying (drill, baby drill and let’s leave the Paris climate accord) and geopolitical competition. If you’re comfortable supporting those tendencies in society you’re on the right track. This is a values/culture war and yes, sadly, you have to choose sides. We’re seeing a global trend of isolationism and reactionary values, it’s now coming from both US, Russia (another trans hating country) and China. Only Europe is left in defence of liberal progressive values, and sadly, forces within our societies, aided by foreign interference (Elon, Putin) is also dividing our societies from within. There’s no natu law that history always moves forward and right now, seems a lot of people would like to see it move backwards so they can reclaim their privileges lost through too much “imagined”. (Yes that’s where you really outed your classist supremacist views) equality.

That sounds like pre-manufactured conspiracy theory. It ticks all of the boxes.

Anyone who has a fundamental issue with trans ideology is right wing, believes in rigid gender roles, is manipulated by Russia, is Hitler adjacent, denies climate change and so on........

As for "classist supremacist" views....I was brought up in a working class family, and have been politicallly engaged since my early teens. My father was a union shop steward and nurtured my political instinct. I set up my first women's group at college, age 16, and then i helped to set up a peace camp outside of an American nuclear base. I lived on a grass verge for two years in a tent.

I've been on every left wing protest march going; have been vegetarian since I was 16. I've lived in squats and marched against 'the city'. I've been a Labour party member. You, on the otherhand appear to know very little, apart from your 'progressive script', and your level of discussion relies on stereotypes, misinformation and the usual round of cliches.

You claim you care about women's rights, yet you cannot even correctly identify what a woman is - other than some vague set of feelings and/or imaginings utterly detached from reality. I imagine you as being in your early thirties, and most likley without children.....and certainly with far less experience than many of us here.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.