This seems to be something a lot of people in the UK struggle with understanding - many Americans are used to their states being in control of a lot of the important legislation in their lives. That's how the country is structured and people like it that way. They don't necessarily like the federal government sticking their oar in, even if they agree with it's stance on an issue.
None of them are prevented from influencing their local state laws and in fact because it's a smaller unit they may feel they have more influence there.
I also think people need to get away from this "Trump got rid of Roe" thinking. No, he had some influence on appointing judges, but it was a legal decision, by the Supreme Court. They didn't just make it up, there is a whole legal decision that's explained in pretty clear detail for anyone that is interested in reading it. It's telling to me that it's uncommon to see people who have actually read the judgement make a legal argument around it's reasoning.
People seem to hate Clarence Thomas, but he's no idiot, and he's a very clear and concise writer, it's not hard to read his judgments. I've never seen anything that makes me think he's made shit up in order to get to some predetermined answer, his views on issues seem to come out of a very careful legal mind.
Roe fell because it wasn't a watertight legal decision, not because Trump wanted it gone. If you use the courts to legislate, that's always going to be the danger.