Imane Khelif medical report reported in Reduxx

[RadicalisedPastThePointOfSalvation]

https://reduxx.info/algerian-boxer-imane-khelif-has-xy-chromosomes-and-testicles-french-algerian-medical-report-admits/

Reading that Vogue article linked above reminded me that the female opponent who forfeited in the first minute on safety grounds later apologised to IK. Makes my blood boil. How sorry is IK that [insert pronoun] was willing to kill her?

One of the very worst aspects of this

They could always compete in the male category...

what the patriarchy clearly wants which is females not boxing for sport

Oh, they will still need some female athletes for the male athletes to easily beat.

I haven’t read all the replies to this thread, but has anyone pointed out how many factual errors are in the article.

I haven't heard about Reduxx before but they are clearly interested in misinformation and are not a reputable source

Rutherford's tweet says" New paper out today: Fair and Safe Eligibility Criteria for Women's Sport: The Proposed Testing Regime Is Not Justified, Ethical, or Viable@RugbyGeneStudy @stebbina coauthored by me, @BlairH_PhD @JonathanOspinaB @SGollishRuns et al.
+ Linked rebuttal.

I can't see the "linked rebuttal". Am I missing something?

I haven’t read all the replies to this thread, but has anyone pointed out how many factual errors are in the article.

Current score is at zero. Feel free to point any out you've spotted.

What misinformation has Reduxx put out in this article or any other reporting?

Or the pregnancy tests that female boxers are required to take

Reduxx are known to be reliable. Their journalists are second to none. Just because you haven't heard of them doesn't mean the rest of us haven't been following their work for a long time. They are fierce when it comes to defending women and children's rights.

I maybe reaching here but judging by inauthentics previous posts, nothing short of IK filming a video of himself saying “yes I’m a man” and changing his name to manny mcmanface would satisfy as evidence

Can you highlight them all for us.

Thanks in advance.

What's your basis for that? You didn't speak to them.

Please point out the factual errors to us.

I don't believe you.

quite

I can't see the "linked rebuttal". Am I missing something?

I assume that was referring to the letter by Ross Tucker, Emma Hilton, Jon Pike, Tommy Lundberg et al, that Emma links to here:

https://x.com/FondOfBeetles/status/1853412031325429901
https://x.com/FondOfBeetles/status/1853412502689681518

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/sms.14754

I maybe reaching here but judging by inauthentics previous posts

I haven’t read all the replies to this thread, but has anyone pointed out how many factual errors are in the post.

I haven't heard about Inauthentic before but they are clearly interested in misinformation and are not a reputable source

That's what I thought

Ooh India et al are getting cross with this thread...

Another Gia I missed 😆

Oh dear never mind

Everyone wave to India

I am looking forward to the falsehoods being pointed out!!

I shall be very happy to wait.

Oooh hello the monitors 🙋🏻‍♀️