Having now read the whole thread, I'd like to respond to this comment.
"anti-trans"
What does "anti-trans" mean?
Do you think the poster you are quoting is anti trans people, or anti the idea of being trans?
To me it makes a big difference.
Anti is framed as such a negative word, but we can't be pro everything. You can be anti war, anti apartheid, your soap can be antibacterial. It's actually a good thing to be anti things which are negative.
For example, I am anti smoking. I think it's a vile habit and would gladly see it banned everywhere. Does that mean I hate all people who smoke? No, of course not. It's the smoking I am against, not the people who are addicted to it.
Same with trans. I am not anti trans people. I can think of individual trans people I like very much. I certainly wish them no harm.
But trans as in the idea, well yes, I'm definitely anti that. I simply don't believe there is any such thing as a gender identity which matches any kind of genitalia. I find the idea ridiculous, and the consequences of people holding this belief harmful. It's harmful to the individuals concerned, particularly those who go on to ruin their health with unnecessary medical interventions. It's harmful to those around them, including their families who may be destroyed by it, and wider society such as women and girls who want and deserve single sex spaces and sports. I find the whole thing pernicious.
If someone considers that "trans" is a harmful ideology, then calling them "anti trans" isn't going to have much impact. Because it's normal to be anti things that you consider harmful.