The problem, @Christinapple, with coming on here & making assertions about, for example, why Bryson was incarcerated in the male estate, is that the posters here are very well equated with the reality & as such have the receipts. We also remember the 2014 policy - ScotGov might not want it kicking about the interwebs, but apparently the Council of Europe didn’t get that memo.
Whinging about Rowling being a billionaire only serves to make you look even more ill-informed I’m afraid: it’s very well-known that she chooses not to be via paying her taxes in full (many wealthy people in the UK engage in legal tax avoidance [as distinct from the crime of tax evasion]) & the incredible amount she donates to philanthropic causes (primarily the two charities she created; setting up the MS centre named for her mother will have cost several million; obviously she’s funding Beira’s Place; & who knows how many things like paying for a flight to get Afghan women out as the country was collapsing she does - she said nothing publicly until it was mentioned in the House & subsequently covered in the press). Or are you just rounding up? 🙄🤷♀️🤦♀️
“How dare someone wealthy & successful have an opinion?!” - I notice the issue is only when it’s the “wrong” opinion. Wealthy & successful people are considered free to cheerlead for males in female spaces & for children to take drugs that are very much not “safe & reversible” - indeed they’re actively expected to do so.