And the point is that they are reported as ‘she’ in that article and refers only to that person’s ’gender transition‘ half way down with a short sentence.
‘Gender transition’ in this case could mean anything, there are over 130 genders. And it has been shown that the UK public don’t understand what these term mean. They are confused by them.
No one is denying this person exists. No one is hating them. People are pointing out that this person is mocking female people’s history of being expected to follow sexist stereotypes. And that it is misogynistic to do so as a male person.
“Because it doesn't cause any fucking harm if a trans tiktoker”
a) wears make up
b) has opinions about make up
c) makes jokes about make up
d) other people find the joke funny and make memes about it
No one is complaining about a, b, c. And d is irrelevant because we know that some people find funny things that are horrific.
You cannot seem to address what people are discussing. You have misrepresented the argument completely. It is like you cannot correctly characterise the points being raised at all.