KJK makes many people, even those with GC beliefs uncomfortable at times.
She is utterly uncompromising on this issue.
I think in part many GC people are still frightened about being perceived as transphobic and being the "bad" person.
As such her approaches can make us uncomfortable because she goes further than many of us would feel able to.
She says what some people think is unsayable or in a way that pulls no punches.
FWIW I don't want ideological/activist marketing in the workplace. Any workplace. That includes pronouns. All any of us need is a name badge and a job title. That's it.
She questions the employability of people who bring that activism to work. I think that's valid when we look at recent tribunals especially ERCC.
Equality is important to me and I think the over dominance of Pride and "the T" is contrary to that. It gets far too much air and HR time and investment at the expense of disability rights, sex based rights and race and ethnicity as examples.
Declare a gender identity at work and people are falling over to accommodate you even at the expense of the law and other workers (see the nurses expected to get changed with a man). Rainbow crossings that cannot be used by people with a visual impairment to demonstrate allyship are another.
I'm fed up with it. It's not transphobic to want a level playing field for all. For HR to start questioning and addressing the lack of black people or those with a disability in senior positions or why in the social care sector which is 80% female, senior managers are massively disproportionately male.
She cuts so close to the bone it hurts, but my god has she been effective in getting this issue in the sunlight.