But its easy to confuse the inept with trolling, too.
One of the strengths of this site is that ideas are challenging in a way that they arent in trans forums. So once their arguments are used here, they fall apart because they havent been tested, challenged and counter argued before.
The basic arguments are that trans people pass so well that they are in single sex spaces undetected, that women 'see' genuine trans people and invite them in, and that some men need to be in womens spaces because the threat of violence is high and disproportionately dangerous.
Notice that evidence isnt provided. Or for the fundamental idea that the need for self defined gendered spaces is more important than the need single sex spaces.
In trans forums, these are assumed without any reality checks, so when they arrive here they expect these assumptions to be take as facts or even relevant. They cant argue, so either argue points that dont help their case (showing some women commit sexual crimes doesnt support the need for gendered spaces), try to derail( look - AI, ask for explain for easily Googleable terms).