Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Are you voting in the next general election purely on the transgender issue?

958 replies

TeacherAnonymous123 · 30/04/2024 12:54

Just as the title says really! Is that your only thought about who you'll vote for, or will you look at wider policies? Been getting lots of information through my letter box recently, and none mention it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:35

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:28

Everyone in France knows that Le Pen isn't capable of actually running the country, which is why there will be lots of talk about how she might win, but when push comes to shove she will lose, just like she loses every election.

This might well come back to bite you! How embarrassing to say you are better informed than literally everyone else! 😂
Does it make you uncomfortable to see France choose in a similar way to Italy?

We have a house in France and everyone in our village is planning to vote for her - even the ones that can’t stand her, the consider macron to be a technocratic leader and not one that actually represents their interests in any way. It’s in the south, so mostly macron territory if you like.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:36

Zonder · 02/05/2024 07:30

This.

It's a no from me. Anyone who thinks the Tories are probably women needs to give their head a wobble.

They have had three female PMs. How many leaders have been female under Labour?

< tumbleweed>

AstonsDataThief · 02/05/2024 07:37

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 05:55

I hate to be that person, but actually anyone with reasonable knowledge of how the EU actually works could have told you what options would be on the table. Soft Brexit (the Norway model) or Hard Brexit (with a side dish of "oh fuck what do we do about the border in Ireland).

There were never going to be any other choices available.

The UK government didn’t have the power to decide that any more than an independent Scotland could decide what trade barriers or border the rUK could impose. The outcome of Brexit was the result of negotiations between the UK and an intransigent EU determined not to encourage others to leave.

cordeliachaseatemyhandbag · 02/05/2024 07:41

Yes, at least that plus Scottish independence.

Women's rights and unionism are 2 red lines for me.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:43

AstonsDataThief · 02/05/2024 07:37

The UK government didn’t have the power to decide that any more than an independent Scotland could decide what trade barriers or border the rUK could impose. The outcome of Brexit was the result of negotiations between the UK and an intransigent EU determined not to encourage others to leave.

No, the potential outcomes of Brexit were known from the outset by anyone with even a smidgen of understanding about how the EU works.

It's a rules based organisation.

Rule 1 of this rules based organisation is that in order to be part of the single market and customs union you have to accept free movement of goods, services, people and capital. These four freedoms are indivisible, you can't have some without the others.

Rule 2 is that there needs to be a border between any country which is inside and any country which is outside.

Everything else is window dressing.

If you understood these two rules it was obvious from the outset what potential outcomes would be possible.

It's not so much that the EU wanted to discourage others from leaving. It's the fact that their entire structure would collapse if they allowed even one country to be an exception to the rules in this way. There's literally no good reason why they would do that.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:45

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:43

No, the potential outcomes of Brexit were known from the outset by anyone with even a smidgen of understanding about how the EU works.

It's a rules based organisation.

Rule 1 of this rules based organisation is that in order to be part of the single market and customs union you have to accept free movement of goods, services, people and capital. These four freedoms are indivisible, you can't have some without the others.

Rule 2 is that there needs to be a border between any country which is inside and any country which is outside.

Everything else is window dressing.

If you understood these two rules it was obvious from the outset what potential outcomes would be possible.

It's not so much that the EU wanted to discourage others from leaving. It's the fact that their entire structure would collapse if they allowed even one country to be an exception to the rules in this way. There's literally no good reason why they would do that.

Edited

Oh, you are one of those Brexit bores still banging on years later <yawn>

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:46

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:35

This might well come back to bite you! How embarrassing to say you are better informed than literally everyone else! 😂
Does it make you uncomfortable to see France choose in a similar way to Italy?

We have a house in France and everyone in our village is planning to vote for her - even the ones that can’t stand her, the consider macron to be a technocratic leader and not one that actually represents their interests in any way. It’s in the south, so mostly macron territory if you like.

I've lived in France for almost a decade and will be voting in the next election.

The village where you have a holiday home is not what will determine the outcome of the election. (And many French people are very much grandes gueules when talking about who they are going to vote for; what they actually do in the privacy of the voting booth is a completely different story.)

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:48

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:45

Oh, you are one of those Brexit bores still banging on years later <yawn>

No, I've moved on. I'm just pointing out that it is total nonsense to say that the UK electorate couldn't have been consulted on roughly how hard they wanted to be Brexited.

It was never all up for negotiation.

There was the hard version (with the tricky Irish border issue to sort out) or the soft version.

Slothtoes · 02/05/2024 07:49

No, not voting purely on this. Voting to protect public services

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:50

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:48

No, I've moved on. I'm just pointing out that it is total nonsense to say that the UK electorate couldn't have been consulted on roughly how hard they wanted to be Brexited.

It was never all up for negotiation.

There was the hard version (with the tricky Irish border issue to sort out) or the soft version.

We are talking about trans issues.

ArabellaScott · 02/05/2024 07:50

Brexit continues to affect the UK and Europe. Our relations with Europe will always affect us.

So yes, people do and will keep talking about it.

ArabellaScott · 02/05/2024 07:51

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:50

We are talking about trans issues.

We are talking about people's reasons for voting the way they plan to.

Soigneur · 02/05/2024 07:51

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 06:02

It’s interesting to see the political developments in the EU and the huge swing to the far right. I feel relieved we are listening to our people in the U.K., and their fears, and responding with referendums and in a democratic way or we would be facing the same fate as France for example. Where it looks very likely Marine ke pen will win this time.

What do you mean by “Where it looks very likely Marine Le Pen will win this time”? The next French presidential elections are not for another 3 years. Do you have a crystal ball?

EasternStandard · 02/05/2024 07:51

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 07:46

I've lived in France for almost a decade and will be voting in the next election.

The village where you have a holiday home is not what will determine the outcome of the election. (And many French people are very much grandes gueules when talking about who they are going to vote for; what they actually do in the privacy of the voting booth is a completely different story.)

Edited

Surely you can’t say more than the pp just based on who you talk to

There must be polls? What do they say

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:51

ArabellaScott · 02/05/2024 07:50

Brexit continues to affect the UK and Europe. Our relations with Europe will always affect us.

So yes, people do and will keep talking about it.

They can start their own thread and not hijack someone else’s because they haven’t had therapy or whatever. This thread is not about Brexit. Stop derailing.

ArabellaScott · 02/05/2024 07:55

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:51

They can start their own thread and not hijack someone else’s because they haven’t had therapy or whatever. This thread is not about Brexit. Stop derailing.

It's a political discussion. I'm discussing with you. PP was discussing politics.

you can't veto other people's thoughts on politics on a political thread because you don't like them. Certainly not 'derailing'.

RebelliousCow · 02/05/2024 08:00

Grammarnut · 01/05/2024 21:56

You seem to mean that David Cameron did not set up a supermajority so that Remain would win? That's not very democratic and considered improper in the UK (ever since the Scots won a vote to have an Assembly in 1979 and did not get it because 40% of the electorate (not the turnout) did not vote for it - a piece of gerrymandering all objected to - so, all referendums work on the principle that the winner is 50%+1). There was no disinformation - not that anyone was listening since almost all voters had decided how they would vote years ago - and anyone who had been listening outside the London bubble would have known how much disaffection there was from the EU. A refenda can only have a Yes/No answer, a three way split is impossible (and will favour the status quo, which may not be what the electorate wants). As for using underhand methods, the Remain campaign got an extra 9M in funding from the supposedly neutral government in the form of a leaflet urging us to vote Remain - I'd call that gerrymandering if I was not polite.
NB Liddington's reference to voter turnout was to the 1979 Scottish referendum. A voter turnout bill would never have got through Parliament - everyone thought it unfair and, as he implied, it is all about making sure the status quo/answer the government wants is certain to be the result. Not democratic. (Where he got the idea no-one was going to act on the result I do not know. Cameron was clear that the result would be acted on, and (bar the undemocratic 1979 Scots referenda) all referenda have been acted on by the UK.)

Edited

For anyone who had been listening to or aware of the chatter in the street/supermarket/hairdresser- it was obvious that the vote was going to be to leave the EU. That people were shocked and surprised by the result was in itself a surprise.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 08:01

EasternStandard · 02/05/2024 07:51

Surely you can’t say more than the pp just based on who you talk to

There must be polls? What do they say

Yeah, there are polls. They're never reliable. They always indicate that this time really is the time Le Pen might actually win, and it never turns out to be true.

No idea what any polls are saying right now. It couldn't be less relevant given that the next presidential election is 3 years away and no one knows who will be running. All we know is that Macron isn't eligible to run again.

abracadabra1980 · 02/05/2024 08:02

No. I'm voting on more important issues.

EasternStandard · 02/05/2024 08:02

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 08:01

Yeah, there are polls. They're never reliable. They always indicate that this time really is the time Le Pen might actually win, and it never turns out to be true.

No idea what any polls are saying right now. It couldn't be less relevant given that the next presidential election is 3 years away and no one knows who will be running. All we know is that Macron isn't eligible to run again.

It’s a long way off so who knows but I don’t think you can be certain on what will happen either

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 08:04

abracadabra1980 · 02/05/2024 08:02

No. I'm voting on more important issues.

You don’t feel the safety of yourself and dds is an ‘important’ issue? Riggghhhhttt….

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 08:05

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 07:51

They can start their own thread and not hijack someone else’s because they haven’t had therapy or whatever. This thread is not about Brexit. Stop derailing.

The thread is about people's voting intentions, and whether they plan to vote purely based on trans issues or whether other things are as or more important to them.

Polishedshoesalways · 02/05/2024 08:06

ArabellaScott · 02/05/2024 07:55

It's a political discussion. I'm discussing with you. PP was discussing politics.

you can't veto other people's thoughts on politics on a political thread because you don't like them. Certainly not 'derailing'.

It’s about trans issues not Brexit.

No one wants to talk about Brexit which is why some with a strange axe to grind ( they usually don’t live in the U.K. btw) hijack other threads to bore us rigid.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 02/05/2024 08:07

EasternStandard · 02/05/2024 08:02

It’s a long way off so who knows but I don’t think you can be certain on what will happen either

No one can ever be certain, no.

But I'm not really seeing anything different now compared to previous years.

Macron is unpopular, for sure, but less unpopular than either of his predecessors.

RebelliousCow · 02/05/2024 08:07

abracadabra1980 · 02/05/2024 08:02

No. I'm voting on more important issues.

Some issues are more temporal, others are more fundamental. Prices, jobs and other such bread and butter issues will always fluctuate - and obviously most people focus on these because they have an immediate impact in their daily life.....whilst issues around the legal definition of sex, women's protections and child safeguarding are longer term and more fundamental.