Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Scarlet Blake - murder to officially recorded as a crime committed by a woman

203 replies

CousinGreg55 · 28/02/2024 23:13

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/28/trans-cat-killer-scarlet-blake-crimes-will-recorded/

I know there are other Scarlet Blake threads but I thought this was significant enough to start a new thread.
According to The Telegraph the murder is to be recorded as a crime committed by a woman.

Transgender cat killer’s crimes recorded as carried out by a woman

Scarlet Blake sent to male prison but the murder of Jorge Carreno will be recorded as a female offence, police confirm

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/28/trans-cat-killer-scarlet-blake-crimes-will-recorded

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
nocoolnamesleft · 28/02/2024 23:13

Not our crime.

GrumpyPanda · 28/02/2024 23:13

FFS.

GretaGip · 28/02/2024 23:15

That's a hard no from me.

Is it time for a petition?

DuesToTheDirt · 28/02/2024 23:15

I shouldn't read this board before going to bed, here's yet another thing to make me lie awake angry!

DuesToTheDirt · 28/02/2024 23:15

GretaGip · 28/02/2024 23:15

That's a hard no from me.

Is it time for a petition?

Yes.

JellySaurus · 28/02/2024 23:21

The murderer will be a woman in the statistics, but imprisoned a men's prison. Why is a lie acceptable in one but not in the other? Why is the collateral damage irrelevant in one but relevant in the other?

PurpleSparkledPixie · 28/02/2024 23:21

How can they decide it's a woman's crime when they have already decided he will go to the male estate? Or should we just be grateful they consider him male enough to go there. Ugh...

FatPrincess · 28/02/2024 23:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 28/02/2024 23:25

It's wrong. It's incoherent and it's an example of how completely fucked up all the data is from the police & the MoJ. Civil servants at the MoJ have been pushing this stuff to the detriment of women for years now and we know that they've actively corrupted our national crime data.

CousinGreg55 · 28/02/2024 23:26

The process seems to be you get arrested, booked in as your preferred gender and that whats
it gets recorded as if you are eventually convicted.

Scarlet Blake - murder to officially recorded as a crime committed by a woman
OP posts:
FatPrincess · 28/02/2024 23:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ErrolTheDragon · 28/02/2024 23:33

CousinGreg55 · 28/02/2024 23:26

The process seems to be you get arrested, booked in as your preferred gender and that whats
it gets recorded as if you are eventually convicted.

Presumably they've got the bastards dna on record though.

You'd think they'd have a way of correcting the record to match wouldn't you. Hopefully at some point sanity will assert itself and they'll be able to put it right across the board.

nocoolnamesleft · 28/02/2024 23:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

These sort of crimes are so rarely committed by women that adding in even a small number from transwomen totally skews the statistics, and makes it look like women are becoming dramatically more violent. Which is seized upon enthusiastically by MRAs.

FatPrincess · 28/02/2024 23:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

FatPrincess · 28/02/2024 23:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NotBadConsidering · 28/02/2024 23:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

How confident are you that the women in the article you read about DV were all 100% female? Are you absolutely 100% positive no males were included?

That’s the problem. Data and news can’t be trusted anymore.

OxQP · 28/02/2024 23:42

Anyone else local want to get together a little protest at the police station? This is such a fucking insult.

JellySaurus · 28/02/2024 23:44

CousinGreg55 · 28/02/2024 23:26

The process seems to be you get arrested, booked in as your preferred gender and that whats
it gets recorded as if you are eventually convicted.

Funny how identifying as innocent does not mean that they are recorded as being innocent. Or identifying s somebody else entirely does not mean that they are recorded as that other person, and therefore could not possibly be the person who committed the crime.

Again, why is one lie unquestionably acceptable, but other lies are discounted?

Avatartar · 28/02/2024 23:44

When I first heard bout this crime, I thought it sounded so unusual for a woman to do something so unthinkable to an animal and was not surprised to learn she had been a man - it’s so misleading ( RIP to the poor man who was then murdered)

Boiledbeetle · 28/02/2024 23:51

NOT OUR CRIMES

Boiledbeetle · 28/02/2024 23:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It affects the average woman because this is not a crime that was carried out by a woman but by a man. You might not be arsed about that I'm fucking fuming.

It's a lie to say it's been carried out by a woman and quite frankly I'm sick of the lies.

Winter2020 · 28/02/2024 23:57

Can that process where if you get so many signatures then something has to be debated in parliament be used?

The debate being biologically men's crimes being recorded officially as women's crimes. Might as well throw in being reported as women's crimes for good measure.

I'm sure the threshold for debate would be met in record time as half the population are being asked to accept that a biological male that tortures animals and murders people belongs with them as a woman purely because he chooses "woman" rather than "man" on a police check in form.

FatPrincess · 29/02/2024 00:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ErrolTheDragon · 29/02/2024 00:04

Can that process where if you get so many signatures then something has to be debated in parliament be used?

Maybe - it has to be something that's within the remit of parliament to deal with. Not sure if this is?

duc748 · 29/02/2024 00:04

I'm sure the threshold for debate would be met in record time as half the population are being asked to accept that a biological male that tortures animals and murders people belongs with them as a woman purely because he chooses "woman" rather than "man" on a police check in form.

And yes, reading that back again. @Winter2020 , that's exactly where we are now in this lunacy. Let's hope this is the tipping point