Stephanie Hayden

[BonnyBo]

The person who did a dive in Jack Monroe’s inconsistencies about her income has put together some information about Stephanie Hayden

https://grift.watch/stephanie-hayden/

I can’t go back and copy and paste bits as my browser is playing up and will erase the post but it’s eye opening!

Thanks, that was an interesting read

That was quite something!

'The fact that so many of these claims do regrettably involve women who are speaking out about a protected belief is also concerning, because rightly or wrongly (and I express no opinion here), it gives the impression that free speech is being chilled. It's an unfortunate look for a democratic country with the bedrock of freedom of expression.'

He's legalgengar on Twitter and did an excellent job of showing what a grifter Jack Monroe is. I'll be very interested to see how what happens with Hayden.

Gosh. Those emails from Sharon Stenton are … something.

Admirably written without needing a single 3rd person pronoun for Hayden 👏.

Bookmarking to read later. Thanks @BonnyBo for this

Stirling work. This bullying individual has got away with too much for far too long.

Needs archiving! Will the Waybackmachine pick this up?

It's archived here: https://archive.is/7OaUe

Quelle surprise - in a shocking turn of events, SH is suing Legal Gengar

https://twitter.com/LegalGengar/status/1757693720294465957

Thank you for the link.

Matthew must have known this was going to happen because of the very history that he published. Brave.

I have an idea that in a previous case a judge made a ruling that any further litigation from Hayden must appear in front of him, as he considered that Hayden was veering towards being vexatious litigator. Am I imagining that?

Legal Gengar
@LegalGengar
A vexatious litigant declaration (Civil Restraint Order) requires two or more cases targeted at the same defendant and the court to declare such cases "totally without merit".

So far, the court has not found any claim to be "totally without merit" so a CRO cannot be applied for.

It is within the power of the Attorney General to apply for a civil proceedings order under s. 42 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 to achieve the same thing without the above criteria needing to be met, but that has not happened yet.

That was Justice Nicklin MyLadyDisdainlsYetLiving.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Nicklin

Since February 2021, he has been Judge in Charge of the Media and Communications List.

Thanks - I see from Xitter that there is another case ongoing, so is it in front of Justice Nicklin do we know?

Interesting background tweets:

https://twitter.com/LegalGengar/status/1756824169319186856

🍿

Legal Gengar had a Twitter thread the other day detailing various of Hayden's monstrous activities, and someone took him to task for referring to Hayden as "he".

People are very stupid.

That Twitter user certainly manages to trigger a reaction:

https://twitter.com/LegalGengar/status/1749298359800639566

Blimey, that's pretty shocking.

Christ. Some unhinged people about.

Aren't they just!

It must be nice for SH to know that SH had SS cheering SH on from the depths of the internet.

I'm not sure i'd be as forthright in my thoughts for a 'friend of a friend'.

The whole thing made for an interesting, if not particularly surprising, read.

I'm sure I saw on twitter yesterday that SH is in court again today.

I imagine that MNHQ is now being targeted by someone repeatedly pushing the 'report' button along with a good stiff legal threat.