The two things have become entangled though, and that is due to the behaviour and choices of some men. And yes that does affect the entire sex class.
For example I'm finding I'm shifting from having all my life welcoming all people of all sexes to wear whatever they like and clothes just being clothes to starting to be wary, because it's been rammed in my face too many times by men that it is often not innocent self expression and choice but a sexual fetish used to abuse non consenting women. While expecting women to
a) continue to insist that they see innocent purity and nothing wrong despite the evidence in front of them because that's 'kind' (as opposed to being a gullible mug)
and
b) to suppress their natural pattern recognition to prioritise caring for any innocent male who may suffer prejudice because of a lot of fetishists abusing women.
This is the 'slightly fraudulent, lovely, fully transitioned accountant' thing as the potential one innocent male who should justifiably be in a women's prison (and so Isla Bryson, Karen White and any other male who feels like being there should be permitted and tolerated in what they do to women prisoners in case the mythical accountant suffers.) And that 'you can suck up a few assaults/rapes etc can't you? rather than traumatise a vulnerable male with boundaries?' thing.
When an advertiser is ramming in my face the whole 'this is a woman' thing, these buttons and experiences are now pushed. Pattern recognition and unwillingness to be exploited is not a hate crime against male people. It's basic common sense. I'm not willing to wilfully shut out that reality at my own expense in order to benefit male people. I'm not a support human.