Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Video of Starbucks employee in UK branch

1000 replies

FisherthemsFriend · 08/05/2023 11:11

https://twitter.com/RupertMyers/status/1655477645184835586

It’s not clear what the customer said, it’s presumed she misgenders the employee as he calls her transphobic. He calls her Karen and then either grabs the phone or the person who’s filming.

https://twitter.com/RupertMyers/status/1655477645184835586

OP posts:
Thread gallery
49
FrostyFifi · 11/05/2023 08:10

Both parties in any exchange have a responsibility regarding communication.

The manager of a hospitality business should be held to a particularly high standard, then. But alas.

KalimbaMoon · 11/05/2023 08:14

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 11/05/2023 02:36

Penis News don't "seem to be trying" to minimise it, they are minimising it. They omitted the physical assault and attempted phone theft against the filming man, the theft of the woman's money through refusal to issue a refund, and the smashed glass door. Claiming that the manager tried to stop the filming makes it seem like he asked the man to stop or maybe put his hand in front of the lens, not that the manager tried to wrest the phone from the man's grip.

The non sequitur about the lesbian couple is forced teaming. It makes a false analogy between someone who might have been unintentionally misgendered and someone who was deliberately accused of paedophilia, in the hope that the reader will be as outraged for the trans person as for the lesbians. It's as transparently obvious and laughable as when my cat turns his back and pretends that he didn't want a stroke after all when I ignore him during a Teams meeting.

Very well said! That last sentence of the article was jarring and smacked of desperation. Look, readers, here’s another example of cruel prejudice we LGBTQ people face in Starbucks!

So pathetic. The article does indeed play down the gravity of the incident but one good thing is they kept the quotes in, which mention the assault. The quotes show up Pink News’ own words as ridiculous pussyfooting, and quite frankly, piss-poor journalism.

Ourladycheesusedatum · 11/05/2023 08:19

Messyhair321 · 11/05/2023 07:48

Both parties in any exchange have a responsibility regarding communication. You're trying to argue that the only way to deal with conflict is to shout, and it isn't.

It wasnt only shouting, there was an assault including an attempt to steal the mans phone, plus broken glass doors. The woman shouted, the worker shouted and assaulted and broke doors.
So maybe it's time the worker learned how to deal with conflict.

MavisMcMinty · 11/05/2023 08:43

There’s a scale underneath the Pink News story with appropriate emojis.

Current scores:

Fired up (9)
Love (2)
Happy (52)
Meh (14)
Annoyed (39)
Sad (12)

Hard to know what to make of them. Are most people “happy” because some misgendering TERF got a mouthful? Or “happy” because an abusive non-binary tantrummer got the sack? Same goes for “Annoyed”.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 11/05/2023 08:49

MavisMcMinty · 11/05/2023 08:43

There’s a scale underneath the Pink News story with appropriate emojis.

Current scores:

Fired up (9)
Love (2)
Happy (52)
Meh (14)
Annoyed (39)
Sad (12)

Hard to know what to make of them. Are most people “happy” because some misgendering TERF got a mouthful? Or “happy” because an abusive non-binary tantrummer got the sack? Same goes for “Annoyed”.

Isn't there a comments page underneath? Had zero comments in when I looked. Not sure what to make of that either.

howdoesatoastermaketoast · 11/05/2023 08:57

@Messyhair321 If you can't deal with a customer complaining without taking it personally you've no business being the manager of a shop.

Looks like narcissistic rage to me - their anger against this woman 'justified' (to their mind) by every other annoying think and grievance that's been building up.

MavisMcMinty · 11/05/2023 08:57

Ah yes, so there is. Tempted to register to leave a comment, although their terms of engagement are very strict.

NicCageisnotNickCave · 11/05/2023 08:59

Comments on Kink News’ FB are mostly reasonable (one person assumes the customer is the aggressor but accepts the correction from another commenter, one person tells PN to stop printing stuff that makes trans people look bad, but it’s mostly people saying ‘you can’t do that if you work a customer services job’).

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid08PoJUpoxEJU8A5fuKTz26qeZNwJq1ubKfrxDrDbJFVDseWbWfwZjUh8zmnPw56MXl&id=198650096517

Log in or sign up to view

See posts, photos and more on Facebook.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid08PoJUpoxEJU8A5fuKTz26qeZNwJq1ubKfrxDrDbJFVDseWbWfwZjUh8zmnPw56MXl&id=198650096517

Emotionalsupportviper · 11/05/2023 09:36

DrBlackbird · 10/05/2023 22:19

Actually, more worrying is that they genuinely believe that these are a ‘normal’ part of expressing sexuality/sexual preferences. It’s mostly young women I really despair for.

I agree.

The future for women and girls looks very dark indeed.

Even if this genderbollox is overcome, the world of easily available hard core pornography, freely accessible by even young children, is brutally influential and is destroying our boys and men, who in turn are destroying our girls and women.

Emotionalsupportviper · 11/05/2023 09:45

Messyhair321 · 11/05/2023 07:48

Both parties in any exchange have a responsibility regarding communication. You're trying to argue that the only way to deal with conflict is to shout, and it isn't.

You're right!

You can also deal with conflict by assaulting people, throwing things, name-calling, and slamming doors, as we have seen.

(I didn't notice the woman "shouting" at all. She was assertive - not aggressive. All the aggression came from the man involved in this altercation.)

Shelefttheweb · 11/05/2023 09:49

FrostyFifi · 11/05/2023 08:10

Both parties in any exchange have a responsibility regarding communication.

The manager of a hospitality business should be held to a particularly high standard, then. But alas.

Both parties here do not have equal responsibilities. Employees have a duty not to discriminate on the grounds of protected characteristics - including manifestation of the belief that sex is immutable. There is no such duty on a member of the public.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 11/05/2023 09:51

one person tells PN to stop printing stuff that makes trans people look bad

Trans people look bad because Starbucks manager did bad and illegal things motivated by his genderist beliefs, not because Prick News reported on them in a minimising way.

BezMills · 11/05/2023 09:52

I had a quick sqizz at Karen's FB page, where there she and her partner made several comments about the incident (some of which are reproduced in the DM reporting above). I live in the same town, although I don't know her personally, we have at least one friend in common. I think I've seen her and her husband about, but to be fair they kind of both look like generic late-middle-age pub couple and I could be mistaken.

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 11/05/2023 10:42

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 11/05/2023 09:51

one person tells PN to stop printing stuff that makes trans people look bad

Trans people look bad because Starbucks manager did bad and illegal things motivated by his genderist beliefs, not because Prick News reported on them in a minimising way.

Also also also...

Tenth rule of misogyny: The worst thing about male violence is that it makes men look bad.

"Shh, don't print news articles about the violent trans male-bodied person because it makes trans male-bodied people look bad."

bd67thSaysReinstateLangCleg · 11/05/2023 10:45

"You're being transphobic".

Rule eight: Men are whatever men say they are and women are whatever men say they are. In this, the male manager says that the woman is transphobic, so she must be Hmm

nilsmousehammer · 11/05/2023 11:37

Morality in these terms is seen as

furthers the aims/benefits the TQ+ politically lobby - morally good

negatively affects the TQ+ political lobby - morally bad.

Through this twisted glass, both being unhinged at a woman for a failure of mind reading, assaulting a man and trying to snatch his phone AND suppressing this information both become morally good.

Sharing facts/failure of mind reading - morally bad.

pussycatinfluffyslippers · 11/05/2023 12:15

Shit overpriced coffee.
🤷‍♀️

RealityFan · 11/05/2023 12:48

pussycatinfluffyslippers · 11/05/2023 12:15

Shit overpriced coffee.
🤷‍♀️

Great service, 'though.

Kucinghitam · 11/05/2023 12:51

BezMills · 11/05/2023 09:52

I had a quick sqizz at Karen's FB page, where there she and her partner made several comments about the incident (some of which are reproduced in the DM reporting above). I live in the same town, although I don't know her personally, we have at least one friend in common. I think I've seen her and her husband about, but to be fair they kind of both look like generic late-middle-age pub couple and I could be mistaken.

Oh, intriguing!

DerekFaker · 11/05/2023 13:34

Messyhair321 · 11/05/2023 07:48

Both parties in any exchange have a responsibility regarding communication. You're trying to argue that the only way to deal with conflict is to shout, and it isn't.

WHY are you hyper-focused on the shouting, and not the physical assault, emptying of the woman's handbag and smashing of the glass door, all of which only came from one side?

DerekFaker · 11/05/2023 13:47

Shelefttheweb · 11/05/2023 09:49

Both parties here do not have equal responsibilities. Employees have a duty not to discriminate on the grounds of protected characteristics - including manifestation of the belief that sex is immutable. There is no such duty on a member of the public.

Exactly. And it's the duty of the person getting paid to do a customer service job to escalate any heated situations, not the customer! This is fairly basic stuff.

mauvish · 11/05/2023 13:48

WHY are you hyper-focused on the shouting, and not the physical assault, emptying of the woman's handbag and smashing of the glass door, all of which only came from one side?

To be fair, we've all seen/heard the shouting and assault on the video. The rest of it emptying handbag, smashing door etc is reported but we haven't had the evidence of our own eyes.

SunnyEgg · 11/05/2023 13:56

Even without that footage the male is more aggressive. The clapping in her face and yelling to get out

Helleofabore · 11/05/2023 14:00

Messyhair321 · 11/05/2023 07:48

Both parties in any exchange have a responsibility regarding communication. You're trying to argue that the only way to deal with conflict is to shout, and it isn't.

And you have victim shamed a women who was being intimidated and abused by saying ‘she was threatening’. Because she raised her voice?

If a person cannot deal with customers who complain, they are in the wrong line of work. If their reaction is to intimidate and abuse a women, they are in the wrong. This was not proportionate in any way.

Katherine1985 · 11/05/2023 14:04

Helleofabore · 11/05/2023 14:00

And you have victim shamed a women who was being intimidated and abused by saying ‘she was threatening’. Because she raised her voice?

If a person cannot deal with customers who complain, they are in the wrong line of work. If their reaction is to intimidate and abuse a women, they are in the wrong. This was not proportionate in any way.

Yes @Helleofabore and such a minor complaint too!! She just had a moan about not being able to pay cash. And then paid by card. It was hardly even a complaint and she didn’t bring it to the manager.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.