That case is a civil court case for defamation. The 'claimant' evidently decided to pursue this through the civil courts as well as making repeated complaints to the police.
What the case indicates is that here we have a complainant well versed in building up cases that the police and courts are forced to entertain.
Irrespective of whether CF is charged or convicted, the process is the punishment.
The complainant in CF’s first arrest identified themselves and has said things like this.
As Felix says, we don’t know all the facts, but it seems neither do the police before rushing in to arrest.
https://twitter.com/flyinglawyer73/status/1527719251322208256?s=46&t=fJOSK8EiYG4do9YpgXSkcg
The complainant in this first case has also posted a video about CF on their YouTube channel.
This isn’t about the merits and flaws complainant or CF. To some extent they are irrelevant.
An impartial observer can see there’s a long standing tit for tat, he said/she said.
If a gender identity wasn’t involved, would the police really be rushing to arrest a woman over this? How would this work the other way round, if a woman reported a man for posting comments about her online. Would they be rushing to arrest a man in front of his kids?
This is why people are concerned. Felix wants to believe that there must be more to it, is giving the police the benefit of the doubt and trying to persuade the world-weary women on this board to do likewise.
We are too jaded and cynical at this point. We’ve seen too many other cases of police abuse.