Caroline F - new arrest / harassment ?

[catsrus]

Caroline has just posted on twitter that the police were trying to force entry - WTF going on?

Three officers saying she has to go with them.

Three.

twitter.com/cf_farrow/status/1651514281471492096?s=46&t=rbPMHI1uvxUAiQC4E1EE3A

Don't hold me to this as my head is on something else at the moment, and my brain doesnt work properly at times, but without going back through im fairly sure it was related to further (4?) tweets she made. But don't take that as gospel I'm struggling today.

Ooh! Been brave today and told Kirstie A she was stupid!

@Felix125 I'm feeling kind, I had to go back and check for my own peace of mind

Information 're historical stuff

https://thepostmillennial.com/british-womans-family-relentlessly-mobbed-by-activists-for-misgendering

@Felix125 tweets from four days ago.

But honestly go to her tweets. You don't need to have an account. She links so much information on there about who and why is behind this.

But what was she arrested for the other day - harassment, mal comms - i don't think she says anywhere, unless I have missed it

She was arrested in October for harassment and malicious comms, so one can only presume that this is more of the same.

She needed to be arrested because her behaviour was not abating and posed a serious risk to the victim.

It sounds like they would have arrested her at the voluntary interview in order to apply bail conditions silencing CF in order to protect the victim.

What victim? Has CF been convicted of anything or accepted a caution?

@Felix125 There it's way to much information about this to try to stick it all here.

I also don't want to inadvertently screenshot or link to the tweets that turn out to be the problematic tweets. Or say anything that later comes back to bite me on the arse.

There is a link upthread to Carolines Twitter. On there she gives all the history with many many screenshots and links to other sources of information that lead up to this week

If people don't want to click on a Twitter link them im sorry but I'm not your mother. The information is out there. Go read it.

I don't need all the history at the moment - just what she was arrested for the other day for now.

That's the problem - it could have nothing to do with that and she has been arrested for something completely separate.

Even completely separate for what the vol interview was for - we just don't know at this stage.

We are all just presuming.

But I don't think we can judge what the police have done here to be right or wrong until we know

@Felix125

That's the problem - it could have nothing to do with that and she has been arrested for something completely separate.

Read her Twitter feed.

And there in one post is your problem.

This is not an arrest in isolation. It is the latest thing in a long line of things being done to this woman.

The fact that it took over 200 posts for you to admit you hadn't even bothered to find out about this woman and her story. you haven't checked her Twitter, you have followed none of the links on her Twitter. You havn't bothered to go and read about it at all have you?

If you have just come on here to quote police procedure then be honest and say that.

how many of the other threads where you've done exactly what you've done on here have you not done any investigation yourself as to what is going on?

Honestly Felix, we are not here to spoon feed you the relevant information.

If you want to go off find out about Caroline. See what's happened over the last few years, the people who she's been dealing with. The shit that she has put up with the way she is being treated now then great. Once you've done that then come back and we can all have a conversation with you.

Until then you honestly have nothing of any significance to add here.

That's not a good look if he's trying to convince us that police don't have any interest in harassing gender-critical women 🤔

Boiledbeetle
Of course the past the past history is relevant - if the arrest is linked to it.

But what if the arrest is not linked to it at all - what if its something completely separate

We need to know what the arrest is before we can judge

But we don't know what it is yet

That's why I am asking about what she was arrested for, to start off with

There are two earlier threads about Caroline Farrow linked at the bottom of this page under 'similar threads'. You could start by reading those which will give you an idea about what is going on here.

All this 'just explain this to me' is wasting everyone's time because you can't be bothered to click on some links for yourself.

If you really are a police officer you're not giving us a very good impression of the police by portraying yourself as someone who is completely incapable of doing the most basic investigation for yourself and who requires members of the public to spoonfeed information to you.

Go read up on it rather than expecting us to do your homework

OldCrone
I can appreciate there is an horrendous previous history for Caroline

But we do not know if this current arrest is linked to it do we.

It will be handy to know therefore, what the reason for this current arrest was - is it related or is it something totally separate?

Because if we don't know why the police attended her address - how can we judge if the police had the necessity to attend in the first place?

Is there an echo in here?

Boiledbeetle

There is no need to read up on it at this stage - because if the arrest or reason for police visit on this occasion is not related to it, its not relevant for this police visit, is it.

Please stop feeding the sealion fgs

Baldieheid

Definatley - you must see the point that that if we don't know why the police attended on this occasion, how can we link it to the previous history.

Hmmm

AutumnCrow
Please stop feeding the sealion fgs

Or just answer the question

Or just admit that we do not know why the police attended on this occasion - so we can not judge if they have acted appropriately or not.

We can not know at this stage if this visit is linked to any previous visit or not

I'm done.

Can people remind me next time. I may forget.

Its not listed anywhere what she was arrested for the other day

So, before we can link this current arrest or police attendance to Caroline's past story we need to know what this current arrest/attendance was for.

For all we know - this current arrest might be completely unrelated. It might have been a shoplifting offence that day, it might have been for drink driving offence or leaving the scene of a car crash. I'm guessing, because I don't know - I wasn't there - none of us were there, so none of us know.

We don't know - we just don't know!

And because we don't know what the arrest was for - how can we judge if the police attendance was necessary.

If you can say for some certainty that the recent arrest/attendance was defiantly linked to her past story - then we have a point we can start from

But at this minute we don't know - we just don't know!

The only people who will know are: Caroline, the reporting person, the OIC and any direct witnesses.

Unless you know something different - but it appears not.