Kate Forbes reported for 'transphobia'

[ArabellaScott]

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/23336504.kate-forbes-may-breached-snp-rules-transphobia/

'KATE Forbes looks set to be probed by the SNP's conduct committee after members of the party's LGBTQ+ wing accused her of breaking rules on transphobia.

In an interview with ITV Border, when asked if she believed a trans woman is a woman, the Finance Secretary replied: "I believe that a trans woman is a biological male who identifies as a woman."'

quite a few people are starting to do this and call themselves trans transwomen. It quite upsets the gender ideologists as they either have to admit transwomen are male and only males can be transwomen or accept self id is valid and allow it. They can’t say the women are not transwomen, as then that sparked the debate of “why not?”. It’s even funnier now some TW are referring to themselves as females as it makes it harder to argue against females being transwomen. Blows their tiny minds 😀

Ok.
So if stating a provable unquestionable biological fact is a transphobic hate crime, then why are all the biology and anatomy and physiology and genetics books not being taken off shelves all over the word and being burned?
Why are persisting in teaching established medical science to med students?
Why isn't Prof. Robert Winston being arrested for perpetuating the myth that sex is immutable, unchangeable and fixed?

If this is an actual CRIME, stating established reality, than EVERYTHING that does so is illegal.

This is so much fucking bollocks.

Men
Are
Not
Women

To be "trans" means that you are NOT that thing. Otherwise you would just BE that thing.

Trans women are biologically male, in every cell of their body. That is not hate, that is a fact.
Arrest me you fucking lunatics.
I'll share my cell with Prof. Winston.

then why are all the biology and anatomy and physiology and genetics books not being taken off shelves all over the word and being burned?

Give it time.

Yes, that'll be next

Wasn't there already a really confusing children's 'educational ' book with 5 genders to replace the 2 sexes in circulation?

I call this 'outwoking the woke' and think sometimes it's the only way to get any traction.

No one listens to plain old fashioned women anymore.

If we all identify as 'trans trans women' could we make a stir?

Do we feel womanly enough to call ourselves trans trans women though? Remember it’s all about the feelz…

I'd argue you need to feel manly just enough to start to feel like a TW with an extra dose of heels, push up bra and miniskirt to make you a TTW.

Arrest me you fucking lunatics.
I'll share my cell with Prof. Winston.

Well, if he says he's Roberta...

Katie's Church have backed her and called her treatment bigoted. I'm glad they at least are behind her.

I’ll make us TTW super spinny skirts. I’m really starting to feel TTW is my true identity

No one listens to plain old fashioned women anymore.

Not sure they ever really did.

To be an authentic TTW would we need to wear visible packers whilst wearing our over the top female outfits, swishy hair, lipstick and tilting heads like mad?

I have no idea how to apply lipstick but I'll give the rest of it a go.

Badly applied lipstick is perfect.

Fire engine red,ear to ear.

I’m practicing swishing and tilting as we speak! 😂😂😂😂😂

Be careful out there @Happylittlechicken you could do yourself an injury😆

Christmasisshit · Today 08:13

Badly applied lipstick is perfect.

You will need:

1. A few drinks
2. Boxing gloves
3. A rocking chair
4. The lights off

Kathleen Stock writes about the opersecution of Kate Forbes in Unherd:

unherd.com/2023/02/the-crucifixion-of-kate-forbes/

"As I say, what we have here is a clash of two religions. One of them is full of sanctimonious, swivel-eyed moral scolds, rooting out heresy and trying to indoctrinate everybody into their fantastic way of thinking. The other is a branch of Calvinism. One of them asks “what would Jesus do?” and the other “what would Owen Jones think?”. Faced with a choice between their representatives on earth, I know which kind I would prefer to see in high office"

I’d rather have the chance to vote for someone like Forbes than any of the three major choices for UK PM.

She appears to be competent, she’s not been embroiled in financial scandal, doesn’t seem to hobnob with the super rich, seems to be able to speak honestly about her thoughts and plans, and hasn’t gargled the gender-woo juice.

As she’s pointed out herself, her religious views are in line with all three Abrahamic faiths. Tony Blair is Catholic; Gordon Brown is Church of Scotland; Thatcher, Major and Cameron are/were CoE Protestants; we’ve got Muslim senior ministers… yet we don’t seem to have banned abortion, or rolled back on gay marriage.

Kemi Badenoch being her usual effortlessly brilliant self

Politico interview

I'd never heard of Kemi so my first impressions are that interview, which is also linked up thread, my first impression is a really really good one.

The BBC are saying the poll for first minister is
Forbes - 28%
Yunsaf - 20%
Ragan - 7%
30% of the vote are undecided
And I'm guessing the others have voted for other less known MSPs.

I love you Kate Forbes

Are you aware that 32 of the UK’s medical schools have signed the GLADD character on affirmation of gender identity?