Jeffrey Marsh

[WarriorNun]

Chilling analysis of his methods for reeling children in and encouraging them to divorce themselves from their parents as well as desensitising them to sexual themes.

twitter.com/hatpinwoman/status/1627307254650134528?s=46&t=Jb6mj5r1Xyzg5KTZ90YTNg

Omg his voice sounds just like Warren Jeffs and it’s legitimately triggering me.

That rolling stone article is so out of kilter with the rest of how the world is viewing JM, they are clearly going for woke points. The journalist states they/them pronouns 🙄

Maybe I should repeat for anyone who missed it.

The videos that Shumima Neesa refer to are behind a Patreon paywall. Accessing them requires giving card or bank details, therefore children cannot access them.

The videos are designed to be watched by parents first, and if the parents choose, watch together with their children.

Neesa deceitfully edited his videos. JM says "hi kids and parents" but she edited out the "parents" part.

Shumibum Neesa is one big liar.

Not sure why you decided to bump this thread...

Here's a link to Shumirun's video for anyone who missed it (she deleted here but it's shown in this) https://www.tiktok.com/@alizarizvi34/video/7205568654996442373?_t=8aci0dKaxzK&_r=1
She didn't edit out the "and parents", it's shown on screen. She was making a point that he wants to speak to kids.
Part of his video that is shown clearly says "your parents messed up, it's ok to say that and that's why I set up a patreon so that we can speak about it in private"

so you think he was aiming that at parents?!?

His later on only became age restricted after these videos pointed out the red flags!

Wrong they were only put behind a pay wall after everything kicked off he hadn't even put an age restriction on his account until after his behaviour was called into question because of his inappropriate videos which all start "hay kids"
Do try harder with your gaslighting @MerlinsLostMarbles next time

Let’s be honest it’s also not impossible for minors to access the content.

Do you think it’s appropriate to be normalising children speaking to strangers on the internet? Because even if we assume Jeffery has the best of intentions he is still suggesting to troubled children than speaking to an unrelated male is appropriate. This leaves them so vulnerable to grooming and predators.

Absolutely right.
Marsh comes across as seriously creepy, but even if a woman was advocating that troubled children (Sibilant “ Kidssssssssssssss”) contact her without parents or carers knowing, it would be a huge 🚩 red flag.
Anyone with a shred of common sense knows it’s not a good idea to speak to minors over social media.

Anyone with a shred of common sense knows it’s not a good idea to speak to minors over social media.

There are a large number of people who clearly don't understand this if the current Schofield situation is anything to go by.

I am laughing at the belief that kids are not going to access a patreon account that was not age restricted. And we know it wasn’t age restricted until recently.

FFS. This is fucking Mumsnet. ‘Mums’ being the operative word! Kids absolutely know how patreon works. And many ‘kids’ have their own bank details and money.

This content is highly inappropriate for ‘kids’ of any age. Even 16 year olds don’t need to be told by this male person about learning to relax and enjoy sex!! And 16 year old have fucking jobs to pay for this content.

Yet again Merlin, you have no understanding of reality. And you show it with every post. Not only do you dismiss violence against women (cream pie and just silly string / water), but this time you are dismissing highly inappropriate sexual discussions aimed at ‘kids’!

You have shown us all you have no concept of sexual boundaries for children.

You are rewriting history in order to pretend Neesa is a liar!

Get to fuck with your gaslighting bullshit!

🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

It's deliberate.

These posters have been involved in many conversations where people like Marsh change the narrative in real time. We watch it happen. And they watch it alongside us. And we all talk about it.

There's no way this is anything other than a deliberate wind up.

Shumirun Nessa is great.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cs84ZdqJcre/?hl=en

Useful advice for men who hate women. In case any happen to be reading.

Yes. It is a deliberate wind up. By some people who have proven they are enthusiastically willing to dismiss harm to women and children to do so.

I've only discovered this topic recently, and am new to transgender issues, but what has struck me in the brief(ish) time I've been reading things is how trans supporters blatantly lie about things, and when pulled up on it, just repeat the lies endlessly. I'm assuming it's a deliberate policy.

We can't know the motivations for people lying, but none of them are good.

JuvenileEmu you may be new to the topic but you've seen straight to the heart of it.