Jeffrey Marsh

[WarriorNun]

Chilling analysis of his methods for reeling children in and encouraging them to divorce themselves from their parents as well as desensitising them to sexual themes.

twitter.com/hatpinwoman/status/1627307254650134528?s=46&t=Jb6mj5r1Xyzg5KTZ90YTNg

The same PP, Kelly Jay Keen, who said she likes the she "likes the imagery" of a trans woman being nailed to a tree and set on fire?

Video here:
https://twitter.com/shaun_vids/status/1649146986598133847

Lostmarbles, you’ve seen the vids of JM encouraging children to leave their parents and contact him, right? And you don’t find that disturbing??

From reading that thread, kjk wasn’t making the comment about a trans woman being nailed to a tree, but a trans rapist’s penis. I suppose that still is a transwoman being nailed to a tree, but I’m suddenly a bit more sympathetic to the kjk position.

Obviously, I don’t actually think the punishment for rape should be having your penis nailed to a flaming tree stump, but hey, I bet we’d have a few less rapes.

Who was this 'perpetrator'? Was she being Untoward About Rapists?

(FWIW, I don't agree that rapists or sex offenders should be subject to violent punishment. But it's quite a commonly expressed opinion that they should be.

If you want to take issue with people's expressed opinions on rapists, paedophiles and sex offenders, I suggest that it's not Mumsnet users who are generally suggesting this type of punishment.

And as for this rapist being a transwoman - for me, when it comes to crimes, I don't think someone's 'gender identity' should have any bearing on how they are treated. I think criminals should be judged according to their crime, not their gender identity.)

You keep misgendering, kjk is a man according to kjks driving licence.
I guess kjk sometimes is a woman and she her pronouns are used and sometimes a man so he him is required.i think you should either contact kjk to find out which pronouns to use when or say kjk like the rest of us.

‘PP’ in a forum context generally means ‘previous poster’ or ‘previous posters’.

Posie really must be living rent free in your head if you think we’re talking about her on every single thread that uses the ‘PP’ abbreviation 😂😂😂

‘Have’ not ‘has’ - the post you replied to was clearly talking about ‘previous posters’ plural, not Posie Parker (singular).

I suspect they/them (singular) has rotted your brain 😆

Anyway, back on topic, what’s JEFFREY MARSH been up to lately?

Has he DFE?

(That’s ‘Deleted Fucking Everything’ btw)

You mean the video by Shumirun Neesa on Tiktok which has been removed because, according to her own account in another video, the police told her to remove it?

I've done a little researching and I presume you are all aware that-

-JM's videos in question are behind a patreon paywall. Therefore they can't be accessed by children as a card payment is needed. SN has not mentioned this.

-The videos are designed to be watched by the parents first. And then, if the parent chooses to, be watched together by the parent and their children. SN has not mentioned this.

-In the videos JM says "hey parents and kids". However SN has edited out the "parents" to make a compilation of him saying "hey kids".

-JM has received threats of violence (which I can confirm as I've seen them for myself) and been accused of "grooming" and being called names such as "p*do" countless times since the tiktok video was released?

As the saying goes, every story has 2 sides.

As far as I know, JM has not deleted anything as he is not doing anything illegal.

Also to point out suggesting people may "need their devices checking" based on their sexual preferences, gender identity or views etc can be seen as malicious communication by police. See case by Christopher Mitchell who stalked and harassed a drag queen.

https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/04/18/anti-drag-christopher-mitchell-auntie-titania-trust-hate-crime/

https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/23451533.protester-christopher-mitchell-court-drag-queen-slurs/

"‘PP’ in a forum context generally means ‘previous poster’ or ‘previous posters’."

Apologies, I thought Posie parker was referred to as she is mentioned often.

Rent free, mate, rent free.

to point out suggesting people may "need their devices checking" based on their sexual preferences

Some sexual preferences are illegal.

Apologists for that creepy “Kids” person Jeffrey Marsh are on here-
Marsh creeps the heck out of women with his sibilant voice laden with innuendo.

Why does Marsh constantly address “ Kids”
An adult male of any persuasion would be viewed with major suspicion if he made grinning “KIDSSSSSSSSSSSssssssss” videos.

Should stick to people of his own age to 🎯.

But kids are innocent and malleable ~and very vulnerable.

A demented grinning middle aged adult of either sex should not be encouraging kids to message them.

Indeed- Like underage children “KIDS”.
🤢
Children need protection from early sexualisation.

I was referring specifically to hetero/bi/homosexuality preferences.

Those aren't preferences. They are sexual orientations.

It's an easy mistake to make, when the trans lobby call sexual orientation a genital fetish.

Nobody cares what JMs sexual orientation is.

We care about safeguarding. Whether JM is straight, bi or gay, the things that JM says and does raise many red flags.

Given that his videos are behind a Patreon paywall, and the woman on Tiktok who made a misleading and manipulation video accusing him was told to delete it by police, what is the problem?

Inviting minors into a private online space?

Seriously?

Nothing to see here?

Jfc.

🚩 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

Merlin,

You might be disappointed to learn that JM was not self censoring until recently. The paywall is new..it was introduced around the same time there was negative publicity.

Your post suggests that you believe JM content is of no concern, due to it being restricted (by paywall) and curated (by parents). Without these restrictions, would you have concern were a child to have unfiltered access to JM content?

I thank Shim (?) for her good work raising the alarm, and breaking the videos down using a safeguarding framework. I'm sure she had not anticipated risk to her family by speaking out. Frankly, in the eye of that particular storm, I understand why she took her videos down.

Marsh has a book out and it's being plugged in Rolling Stone

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/lgbtq-tiktok-jeffrey-marsh-interview-1234738514/

I accept that Marsh is gonna Marsh but ffs Rolling Stone!?

Well said. It's like when 'feminist' Laurie Penny said that if a man comes into your changing room and flashes you, you should just be polite and not look.

Anyway this Jeffrey guy. I saw a video he did on Thanksgiving. Basically saying that if there are any trans kids out there whose parents aren't 'affirming', then they can come and live with him and he'll be their new family.

The FBI needs to check his hard drives.