I have to push back a little, and this possibly explains my willingness to try writing to him:
He's a danger to women. He refuses to listen to them and arrogantly assumes that he knows best.
He did a lot of seriously important work with the CPS on domestic violence. He worked very closely with victims of DV and really earned my respect there. In addition, he has also said: "It is my personal mission to tackle violence against women and girls. It is destroying lives and families. This government is failing. Labour would act to protect women."
His 'focus group' to check out his male supremacy thinking was to ask his white, highly privileged wife and white, highly privileged teen daughter whether they agreed with him.
This is completely irrational.
He's destroyed the only viable challenge to the Tory party because of this arrogance.
Corbyn? I honestly think people who think this country would ever elect someone like Corbyn to be PM are in their own echo-chamber fantasyland, parallel to the one that believes TWAW. I come from a family that have been staunch Labour for decades, and not one of them voted for Labour under Corbyn.
He's fucking the country over through his refusal to listen to people's very well thought through concerns.
How do you know he's not listening? He has stated that he knows for 99.9% of women this issue is about biological sex. He has said equality for women must not be compromised. I'm hopeful that his insistence that Labour will not be captured by narrow interests applies to the gender issue as much as anti-semitism. I am hopeful that the mess the SNP has got themselves into will spotlight the political costs.
I'm not ready to judge him for not coming roaring out because he also has to straddle tensions in his party, and he has to get elected. But that doesn't mean he's not listening. Gender issues are one of many desperately pressing issues, none of which can be dealt with unless they are elected.
He said 'it should never be said that only women have a cervix'
It would have been more prudent for him to say, "trans men also have a cervix" given public feeling. But this is an inconvenient fact. If the transman has a GRC, they are legally men, and they have a cervix. Which means, like it or not, legally some men can have a cervix. And KS is a barrister - he is going to be legally accurate. I do not think that quote is conclusive evidence of real bias. I suspect, if pushed on this, and asked if transmen without a GRC were men, he'd probably reply something along the lines of 'legally, No'. Because that would be accurate too.
and feels that he, a man, has the right to tell women what they should and shouldn't say.
I think the phrase 'it should never be said...' was general and based on legal accuracy. It certainly wasn't specifically directed at women.
He needs out of politics now. He's not fit to lead a scout group let alone a governing party.
I think millions will disagree with you at the next election.