If you're not doing it in bad faith, you need to figure out why you're doing it.
I have been genuinely trying to figure this out since the Brighton event across threads now.
Trying to work out if is deliberate dishonesty, just inconsistency, or cognitive distortions. I suspect that if you are in a situation where you are so dependent on the good will of the leadership of the Brighton Feminists and prominent posters of Actual Gender Critical Left Facebook page who are also in published leadership positions for WPUK that the pressure to walk a very narrow line is huge.
That could cause the disconnection between the accusations that are on this thread even and the ‘just disagreements’ too. If those particular people are covering up their bullying with that weak arsed sleight of hand ‘just a disagreement’, when responsible for the fuckoffposie hashtag as an example, then maybe you believe that if they are someone you love.
And I could be very wrong and it is many other reasons.
But the same people in those three groups makes it very clear to me, that of course, Woman’s Place UK would not see their actions towards KJK as ‘bullying’. They see is as ‘disagreement’ and justify their actions that way.
One person has moved on from WPUK who might have been the original source of the page still up on WPUK about KJK, but the others are still there. And have replicated the initial bullying action and gone further on the Brighton Feminists site, now know as ‘the sin page’.
The ‘bullying’ action has been to hypocritically take what KJK says and call it racist and other accusations while ignoring that they are either the same or similar to what Julie Bindel and others in the inner sanctum also say. And to use it to bully KJK.
To reject the disrupter who does things differently to them. Who says things without the nice and civil wrapping. But is saying pretty much the exact thing. KJK is not even taking a harder stance on the issues she and others who write about it, but that the group state is vile enough to put up a sin page. She has just said it plainly without the wrapping of a socialist feminist.
I find dealing with the dissonance in what is happening and what is being said to happen to be exhausting. But knowing who the group behind it all is now, I expect they only will ever accept their mates to accept their narrow and twisted explanations.
However, the accusations need to be addressed because readers will take that misinformation as being accepted if it is not.
Meanwhile, the rest of us will view it as it is in reality. Bullying behaviour.
And a warning about what will happen if anyone says anything that is not carefully curated to fit the diktats of those few people.