You clearly didn’t read this hearache and are up to your normal tricks of making what you think are pithy comebacks that progress your argument.
Anyone reading this judgement, would not be celebrating. These paragraphs will take Stonewall a very long time to recover from as PR objective.
Do you actually understand that Stonewall requires corporate funding for their existence?
Only a person who can only have a superficial view of business practices and government processes as you have displayed on numerous threads would take to celebrating. Or someone who thinks they can continue to get away with dishonesty.
I know you think you are on the wind up here tonight but all you continue to do is show how little you understand. And here your celebrating Stonewall is laughable.
If anyone in the Stonewall team is celebrating, it is because the Judge decided that the responsibility rested solely on GCC so Stonewall was released of responsibility.
This means
a) GCC’s senior management didn’t really take much Stonewall advised as useful or usable. And showed they, a renowned chambers with many LGB barristers and employees, only really paid lip service to Sonewall’s ‘evangelical’ teachings.
How are you going to spin that particular finding as a success for Stonewall? A chamber with many prominent LGB members don’t take the advice given seriously by Stonewall …
Hardly an endorsement.
b) this also signals that justice in this case required the GCC to take full responsibility for their actions. And that this judge was not going to allow GCC to move its responsibility to Stonewall.
Think about it. What precedent would that set? A chamber of barristers diverting responsibility for discrimination to an outside source? Would ANY advisory organisation exist within 2 years?
Do you actually understand this?
And how hard is it going to be to grow funding to cover the losses recently with those paragraphs?
These paragraphs, along with celebrating the transitioning of 2 year olds, Nancy Kelley’s statements (which you have persisted in not acknowledging)….
Only a fool would think this is truly a win. I suspect Stonewall posted intimating that it was a ‘win’ out of bravado. And influencers are trying bolster Stonewall’s reputation as their futures are entwined. But fools dance across the internet celebrating that avoidance of being forced to be responsible for their actions like this was a ‘win’.
If past form stays true, you, hearache, will either ignore this post, or try a distractive tactic, or write a short comeback that sounds clever in your head but not to anyone who has any depth of knowledge reading it.