If you lot could only see how profoundly irrelevant you are to most people who do not spend their time obsessing about toilets, you might stop imagining that anyone will care about your little boycott
The hilarious thing about this gem of a comment is that if ‘us lot’ were actually as ‘irrelevant’ as this poster likes to think, they’d be saying ‘go for it! Boycott to your hearts content.’
The thing is, these couple of sentences actually reflect the underlying issues well.
As pp have said, this poster has invested two days of hatred into this thread. And has used many manipulative tactics that simply show that if they actually thought deeply about it, they know what they are advocating for is simply not supported by the majority of the UK population.
Not out of hatred or phobia, simply because the majority of women, those with a female sexed body, have their own valid reasons for not wanting to use mixed sex toilets. They might use them because there are no options, but they prefer female single sex toilets. Men too seem to prefer their own single sex toilets.
The ‘profoundly irrelevant’ is all projection. The extreme activists realise that outside of their group, the wider population want to be kind where possible but don’t support these activists claims that gender is prioritised over sex where sex matters.
That must be hard to accept. That they as a group are the ones that are ‘profoundly irrelevant’ in many ways despite their lobby power that they gained when Stonewall got on board. Look at what has happened in a few short years really since Stonewall changed their focus. Organisations are dropping out. Because there has been a very real over reach and the public are not supportive of those over reaching claims.
If we were ‘profoundly irrelevant’ this OP would have simply laughed and produced evidence links to prove that they had all this public support behind them.
They haven’t, because they won’t find them. Over 80%, maybe even 90% of transitioned males retain their penises. And many still have full use of them. As evidenced by the porn sector that is growing, of some of these males masturbating in female toilets. (Want evidence, go and Google it yourself, the links we post get deleted… because activist posters don’t seem to want those known about maybe)
And as additional evidence their penises work , the rather large number of these transitioned males with pictures of their masturbatory efforts on twitter. (Be aware readers if you are on twitter, be very careful just which profiles you click on to see their profile and timeline. Even some of the political party affiliates!)
It is consistent. As soon as the respondents in public and properly randomized surveys are asked about allowing males into toilets and changing room with penises, the numbers are no longer supported. I believe that even OP has that boundary, although I might have misread that post.
Yet.
That poster is here deriding, dismissing, derogating women stating their boundaries. They have now stepped up to demonising and monstering.
Why? Who benefits from this?
It was long established on this thread that OP spun the twitter outraged interpretation on those tweets to their first posts. They were declaring misinformation was being spread, hypocritically while misrepresenting the tweet and thus spreading misinformation.
This tweet:
“I was at the Barbican yesterday where there were male toilets, disabled toilets, and gender neutral toilets. I asked where were the female toilets as I am not gender neutral I am a woman and they laughed in my face. Women are being erased.”
No. We are not ‘profoundly irrelevant’. We are but the tip of the iceberg of people who wish to retain female single sex spaces. The very depths of the iceberg is beginning to show now and extreme activists, like OP, are realising they have to use dishonest tactics to try to chip that iceberg down in size. Because they realise the general population have only ever been supportive on the surface but are now realising the implications of that support.
The conversion of toilets and changing rooms into mixed sex. And as several people have confirmed on this very thread the marginalisation in some facilities of female single sex provision if they are still even provided. Marginalised by being hard to find for some users, and maybe too hard to get to.
And yet, so much hate being delivered here on this thread for people who simply refuse to toe the line trying to be dictated by lobby groups and heavily invested self-identified media influencers.
Women saying no truly seems to infuriate some people, doesn’t it?