@DameHelena
What does one say to this argument? I’m instinctively sceptical but I don’t know if I’m right to be.
Weak, as so many of their arguments are.
Thing X has been done by Group Y for Z years.
Is not the argument they're making either. It's
Thing X has been done by Group Y for Z years. Why are you suddenly bothered?!
Which assumes that anyone outside of Group Y must accept it. Which assumes that anything done for any length of time must be okay. Which assumes that no one has been bothered by Thing X being done before. Which assumes that objections aren't valid if they're not voiced immediately.
All of these assumptions are false.
Duration tells us nothing about how right or wrong something is. Objections not being voiced tells us nothing about whether there are objections. And history is just chock full of examples of particular groups doing things others object to and getting away with it. For centuries. Millenia even. And history too is filled with examples of uprisings against wrongdoings only after many years of enduring wrongs. There comes a moment when enduring is more harmful than resisting. I think that's where many of us are now.
And saying that men have been using women's spaces for decades without women's consent and getting away with it is not what I would call a winning argument. Many of us are only now speaking out because we didn't dare before. It's not because we didn't mind.