They used to say “risk” was why you couldn’t have women join the armed forces or police force or be fire fighters. Risk to colleagues, risk to themselves from criminals, risks to not being strong enough to carry a victim from a burning building. These were all real risks. They weren’t made up. But the correct response wasnt to ban women from these professions due to risk, was it?
Having had some experience with the military, it was due to sexist discrimination. I believe the same for police force and fire fighters. However, you are quite correct it is likely that a female fire fighter may have difficulty in carrying a victim out of a burning building. Hence, they have mixed teams.
Your point is another false comparator though. You are pointing out workplace sexist discrimination. We are discussing safeguarding. You can keep throwing false comparisons but they simply don't stick.
So why do we think it’s correct to do the same to transwomen? If risk can be managed for women to increase equality, then why can it not be managed for the equality of transwomen too?
Because, we are talking about safeguarding.
Should transitioned males be subject to workplace discrimination?
No, unless it is a role designated for females.
Should transitioned males by subject to the same discrimination as all males for the purposes of safeguarding?
Yes.