@334bu
*Trans and non binary children are every bit as deserving of good safeguarding practice also*
Absolutely and if a few extra single entry mixed sex toilets are provided , there is no reason not to provide them with the same alarm system as you would find in a toilet for the disabled. In that way the single sex provision can remain as is, the toilets for the disabled are not being inappropriately used and those who do not wish to use their own sex's facilities have a place which they can use safely.
I was meaning more that it’s not good safeguarding to put a female trans or non binary pupil into the boys toilets. She doesn’t deserve less safeguards than any other child just because she identifies otherwise.
I do think it’s wise to have some mixed sex provision as stand alone toilets, but individual ones spaces around school not to replace single sex options as they always have been. Putting a row of them in place as if they are standard isn’t good safeguarding imho. I could imagine my own autistic dds might prefer stand alone toilets for changing pads etc initially as very anxious and self conscious about these things. But the necessity of a few stand alone toilets shouldn’t replace the usual single sex options we’ve always had.