Your choice to deny and overlook sex is yours. It's not mine. It's not that of many women. Those women should not be forced to validate political beliefs they do not hold with the physical presence and vulnerability of their bodies, their bodily privacy, their bodily dignity, their physical safety, in order to enable some natal male people freer choice and autonomy.
In the hope that the ideology is proven right, rather than that they suffer as a result.
Unless it is a valid argument that no one should be in sex segregated prisons, and these are unnecessary, it is pointless to argue that some natal male people should be given the choice of whether or not they are able to have direct access to the presence of natal females. (And those natal females given no choice about whether or not they consent.)
The fact that those natal male people may be serious sex offenders just takes the whole 'female people treated as subhuman props' part to purely ridiculous levels.
I do not expect you and everyone else to agree that you have a guardian angel or to state that you accept Christ as your saviour, or genuflect as the passing of an altar. The limits of personal belief are compelling the non consenting participation of others. And to require that they sacrifice their own sense of privacy, dignity, safety and legal rights to subordinate themselves to the politics of others?
It's outrageous. And deeply sexist.