An interesting take on the topic from Nigel, who leapt in to mansplain climate change to us poor little boofheads when that wasn't what we were talking about at all.
Mixing genderwoo with climate science is a bad look for XR and they were wise to take the tweet and replies down, though it's good that they were archived.
Nigel needs to a) read a thread to understand what it's actually about and b) understand that gender critical people (those who understand biology and believe that sex is an actual thing) can simultaneously grasp the elements of climate science and believe that's actually a thing, too. In fact holding both beliefs is a perfectly logical stance for a scientifically literate person.
Believing in climate science while also waffling about sexy trees and non-dimorphic species echoing human diversity? Less so. A lot less so.
As one PP said, show us a person who was grown from a cutting and didn't need both a female ovum and a male sperm to bring them into existence.
Nature is indeed wonderful and also sorely in need of protection from the exploitation of the greedy and the stupid.