The upside, I fervently hope, is that teenagers are entirely swayed by what’s fashionable, and what’s fashionable now is going to be something they’ll want to reject in a few years’ time; so fungers crossed that in the end we can rely on teenagers’ own fickleness in reacting against previous cohorts’ pet ideas.
Ten or twelve years ago at the end of the last Labour government all my students were very socially conservative, very gendered (girls all dolled up in makeup and dresses for lectures, boys v openly homophobic); and they were simply not interested in any kind of identity politics, which they thought very old-fashioned. On the contrary - they were all self-styled “radical conservatives” and pro-Nick Clegg “radical centrist” Lib Dem activists, as according to them, the new “kind conservatism” and the Big Society was the way forward 😂 (It’s quite hilarious to think of this now. I kind of miss those particular delusions….)
So, hopefully, in ten years’ time these “woke” delusions will be replaced with something else completely different, and gender identity will then be oh-so-old-fashioned. (Let’s just hope whatever replaces it is reasonably sane and not even worse.)
(All this is I know not reassuring for those whose kids are right in the middle of it….) Has anyone tried asking their teenagers why, if gender identity ideas are right, they’re so incoherent and contradictory? Logically trans and non-binary should be the opposite to each other, but they don’t seem to see that. How does believing fervently in a gender binary in the case of trans people, square with the ideas of the “non-binary” ones who are trying to get away from one altogether? If biological sex is a spectrum why are non-binary people rejecting biological sex because it’s too binary, since then sex would be non-binary anyway and they wouldn’t need to? You can’t believe in both things at the same time - the internal logics don’t work together.
They never seem to think about these contradictions, but gently pointing them out does flag up some of the conceptual incoherence and inconsistencies that are being papered over, and hopefully it might get some doubts going.