Why don't we ever get TW on the tails of prostate cancer organisations etc hassling them to change it to "person with a prostate"? That applies to them after all, I would have thought the word "man" would be triggering as being misgendered is literal violence don't you know?
All quiet on the western front on that though. However activist after activist admonishing everything going with the word "woman" in it to get that word removed.
The day they start going after the word "man" as vehemently as "woman" I may feel differently. I shan't hold my breath. To me, this is less about inclusive language and more about no reminders of the things women have, that only women have. It's the word "woman" that is triggering and they want it wiped out. No naming women, no naming the things that only happen to women, no naming women only experiences. And if you can't name the sex, you can't fight sexism, or say there are issues that only affect that sex, or in the end, any differences between TW and women at all. And that's the goal. Already claiming the word female now women has all been but conquered.
Inclusive language is "women and other pregnant people". You want to be called something other than "woman" then you make a request for that, not the other way round. Not when women might be deeply offended - but being women, won't want to make a fuss, so stay silent and put up with it.
They wouldn't pull that shit with men. They wouldn't dare. Its why women get the death and rape threats for saying it, and a man might say the same and get fuck all pushback. When it comes to who to target, they know.