"and it showed me that when I used to speak about “the average woman”, it was a lazy, self-reflective assumption: we bled, we fed, we bred. I would sit happily discussing the books I had written, all the while perpetuating the idea of “woman” as white, fertile, able-bodied, straight, cis."
There is some serious internalised misogyny going on here - she seriously thought that women just bleed, feed, and breed? I'm sorry, I don't believe her. I don't believe for one second she had an 'idea' that women couldn't be black, or infuriate, or disabled, or lesbian. I'm honestly supposed to believe that this woman excluded people from the category of 'woman' if they happened to be bisexual, or couldn't have kids? No way. That's bizarre.