Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

*TW* Pedophile found guilty of raping 5 year old given a SUSPENDED SENTENCE

237 replies

SebastianTheCrab · 15/10/2020 16:57

How? How??

If anyone knows how I can donate to the mum's bid to challenge his sentence in the High Court please tell me.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8843789/Mother-devastated-paedophile-walked-free-court-raping-five-year-old-daughter.html

OP posts:
Margaritawithlime · 15/10/2020 17:47

Does anyone know the name of the judge. I’m writing my letter now

CaraDuneRedux · 15/10/2020 17:47

Thank you @HeronLanyon - useful background info.

gardenbird48 · 15/10/2020 17:48

@CaraDuneRedux

Provide as much information as you can about the case to the Attorney General’s Office - the information they ask for on their web page, with the required info copied from the Daily Mail article:
name of the person who got the sentence

Callum Haydock

date the sentence was given

1st October 2020

court where the case was held

Worcester Crown Court

crime committed

Rape of a child under 13

(PS I frequently cock things up, so if people could fact check this, please do).

yep, that's what I put.
CuppaZa · 15/10/2020 17:48

@ThinkWittyThoughts

*TW* Pedophile found guilty of raping 5 year old given a SUSPENDED SENTENCE
wellbehavedwomen · 15/10/2020 17:49

Yes, you can appeal unduly lenient sentences. (This is edited from a FiLiA piece a while ago, on another horribly lenient sentence, which I used as a template. Thank you to FiLiA.)

You can write to the Attorney General to demand an appeal. You have only 28 days to register this complaint. You can send a letter by post to:

Attorney General
The Rt Hon Suella Braverman QC
5-8 The Sanctuary
London
SW1P 3JS

or via e mail to:
[email protected]

If you need any help with wording, please cut, paste, amend and make the following your own and please share:

FAO The Rt Hon Suella Braverman QC

I am writing to request that you review the sentence handed down to Callum Haycock at Worcester Crown Court on 1st October, for the rape of a five year old child. This 21 year old man did not plead guilty, and therefore subjected a five year old to providing witness evidence at the trial of her own rape. He was sentenced to just three years of community service, with five years on the Sexual Offenders Register. There was no custodial sentence.

This sentencing level is grossly inadequate for an adult convicted of extreme sexual violence towards a very young child. It does not begin to reflect the seriousness of the offence, it cannot serve as any deterrent to others, and it does not even adequately provide for proper levels of oversight and monitoring in the years ahead. I therefore believe that this sentence is unduly lenient. I ask that this case is referred to the Court of Appeal.

These things have a lot more sway if the wording is personal, so please do write your own email if you have time, or stomach, to do so. This mother, and above all brave little girl, so deserve our solidarity.

If the mum is on Mumsnet: we send love and outrage in equal measure. Your little girl is the bravest of the brave, and it's horrific that a judge let her down so horrendously badly. I very much hope that the Appeal Court do review this, and ensure justice is done.

Whatwouldscullydo · 15/10/2020 17:50

That poor poor girl Sad

Justifiedandquiteold · 15/10/2020 17:50

That is sickening. Benefit cheats get sent to prison (don't approve of that but it isn't the same as this) but this b*stard gets off. Poor child and mum.

cabotstove · 15/10/2020 17:50

I'm sorry but how did we get to the point that raping a child doesn't result in a jail sentence?!

IDontMindMarmite · 15/10/2020 17:50

There's a very big problem with this judge. Isn't it very fucking suspicious when these judges (because this has happened far more frequently than it ever should have) basically condone paedophilia and rape?

wellbehavedwomen · 15/10/2020 17:51

Sorry, this thread (brilliantly!) updated lots while I was typing. I found the FiLiA piece really helpful a couple of years ago, so went and found it to use as a template - meanwhile, the rest of the vipers were on the case, so no need to after all.

I so desperately hope that this review succeeds. How the hell is this the world we inhabit.

BovaryX · 15/10/2020 17:56

@Imnobody4

What possible circumstances could justify this sentence. Will the court transcripts be available. Who the hell was the judge.
What is going on in the UK? This is not justice. When the police, the CPS, the judiciary repeatedly betray the victims of violent crimes, they erode public confidence in the state to do one of its fundamental jobs; protect citizens from violent criminals and deliver justice. It's absolutely shocking.
BovaryX · 15/10/2020 17:58

@cabotstove

I'm sorry but how did we get to the point that raping a child doesn't result in a jail sentence?!
It didn't happen overnight. But the writing has been on the wall for some time. The idiot mantra 'prison doesn't work' has been accepted by both main political parties. This is the upshot.
Indoctro · 15/10/2020 18:01

Should be life in prison

BovaryX · 15/10/2020 18:03

@Indoctro

Should be life in prison
What message does this kind of non custodial sentence send to other recidivist rapists? It really is an outrage. The judge is a frickin disgrace.
timetest · 15/10/2020 18:06

Is it possible to name the judge and read his summing up comments and reasons for sentencing so it can be included in the letter?

Kantastic · 15/10/2020 18:06

He was also fined £200 and ordered to pay £2,500 to the victim as well as being put on the Sexual Offenders' Register for five years.

So on top of everything else he's only on the sexual offender's register for five years?

What exactly is the point in having a sexual offender's register if a man convicted for raping a 5yo 6 years ago doesn't show up on it?

I don't even have words for that sentence. I would like to find out more about the judge responsible for it.

jessstan1 · 15/10/2020 18:12

I don't get this at all, it's scandalous that the guy wasn't locked up.

DialSquare · 15/10/2020 18:13

Sickening. That poor little girl. If someone took the law into their own hands and harmed this scumbag in anyway, you can bet they wouldn't get off so lightly.

JuiceBogTrotter · 15/10/2020 18:14

£2,500. Is that really all that little girl is worth? The more I think about this, the anger I become.

JuiceBogTrotter · 15/10/2020 18:15

@DialSquare

Sickening. That poor little girl. If someone took the law into their own hands and harmed this scumbag in anyway, you can bet they wouldn't get off so lightly.
I am not condoning any kind of vigilante justice in any way, but I hope he sleeps easy with his name, address and photo all over the news. He'd be run out of my estate- or, more likely, be too scared to come back to his own address.
WaspRelatedEmergency · 15/10/2020 18:16

This makes me wonder about the judge. Why be so lenient?

RuffleCrow · 15/10/2020 18:17

I feel like we really don't know who's pulling the strings behind the scenes here. Rape is being treated like a victimless crime - because those doing the sentencing don't regard women and children as human beings.

ImaSababa · 15/10/2020 18:19

Tragic but not surprising. The judiciary and upper echelons of the establishment are crawling with nonces.

JuiceBogTrotter · 15/10/2020 18:20

@WaspRelatedEmergency

This makes me wonder about the judge. Why be so lenient?
I am really struggling to work it out. In the event he had some mental disorder that made him not fully culpable, surely he would have been detained under the mental health act or something? So it doesn't seem that's the case. I can't think of any other circumstances that would mean he can basically get off scot free.
Antibles · 15/10/2020 18:24

@WaspRelatedEmergency

This makes me wonder about the judge. Why be so lenient?
My thoughts too.

Disgusting sentence.

Swipe left for the next trending thread