Nigella Lawson - another disappointment

[Kit19]

Any celebrity who thinks we should all just be kiiiiinddd

*2 minutes longer.

Completely agree with every word somanyactivites said above.

I will not say God is real. I will not say I believe in Allah. I will not say someone born male is a woman.

Those are personal, private beliefs and while they can be believed by the individual, they should not be imposed or forced upon the rest of us.

I don’t know - do you?

I think what I love most about these threads is that they’re never repetitive. So many new insights and arguments every time I dip in.

I don’t know - do you?

No, they didn't.

Evans-Smith is Fallon Fox's only defeat to date.

It could be that Fox is just really good at their sport. Or.......

At least Fallon Fox 'enjoys' what they do though.

RedTrees males orbits are thicker than females so no, Fallon Foxs skull was fine. The male orbital was unharmed, unlike the females.

I don't think any of us here would accept bigoted behaviour

That's rubbish though, I've seen it happen. (Not from you for clarity, it does happen though,)

It's impossible to be a transwoman without being a biological male
Has anyone said otherwise?

Think where we must be differing is I don't see all trans women as threats as must be as biologically male.

I think what I love most about these threads is that they’re never repetitive. So many new insights and arguments every time I dip in.

I agree, it does get very repetitive on here. Why do you think that is? I have to say, I do get a bit tired of going over the same arguments time and again and would really like someone to come up with something new.

Feel free if you want to

Think where we must be differing is I don't see all trans women as threats

Nobody has said they are. But they are all male.

Quaagers so as males, why cant transwomen share spaces with other, lovely non violent males?

Not sure how you’d know that without access to post fight medicals Fox only fought a handful of fights and was knocked out by a female opponent.

Think where we must be differing is I don't see all trans women as threats as must be as biologically male.

98% of sexual offences are carried out by men. Men as a class are high risk, women as a class are low risk. This is why we don't let any males, not even the nice ones, into female spaces.

At what point does a transwomen come out of the 'high risk' category of male and into the 'low risk' category of female? At what objective point, upon which policy and law can be made, of transition does that move actually happen? What are the criteria for that significant move to take place?

Of course it's repetitive. Some people can't accept material reality and are expecting us to go along with it, losing hard earned rights in the process. Unfortunately, as soon as women stated pointing out the clash, they were attacked. If everyone had said "You're right. What can we do to remedy this? Is there a solution? We wouldn't be in this situation now. So it's worth repeating. We are not accepting this and we will bloody fight with everything we've got to retain our rights. I couldn't give a shit if you're bored with that.

Know what Redtrees?

That Fallon didnt suffer a fractured orbital, or that skeletal bone differences between males and females exist?

The former obviously

Nobody has said they are. But they are all male

Read again what my comments.

I have a different viewpoint to you, doesn't mean I don't recognise bology,

I don’t know - do you?

If you're talking to me, yes I do know. Ashlee didn't break Fallon's skull.

To do so it would have taken significantly longer, a hell of a lot more stamina, a hell of a lot more strength and speed-something biological men have in abundance compared to women.

So Ashlee may have won, but it was in no way a fair or equal fight. Sports are supposed to be fair and equal. Not 'inclusive'.

@SoManyActivities

Think where we must be differing is I don't see all trans women as threats as must be as biologically male.

98% of sexual offences are carried out by men. Men as a class are high risk, women as a class are low risk. This is why we don't let any males, not even the nice ones, into female spaces.

At what point does a transwomen come out of the 'high risk' category of male and into the 'low risk' category of female? At what objective point, upon which policy and law can be made, of transition does that move actually happen? What are the criteria for that significant move to take place?

Excellent questions - I'm interested to hear the responses.

always interesting to meet a woman who doesn't require any privacy from men Qaagars

having such a distinct lack of boundaries must make life complicated I'd have thought?

Redtrees do you have any reason to believe Fox did have a fractured oribital? Its incredibly unlikely a female fighter could fracture a male orbit in a fight like that.

Is this just a "whataboutery" argument to deflect from Foxs male skeletal structure and the advantage that gives them when they punch women?

Not sure how you’d know that without access to post fight medicals confused Fox only fought a handful of fights and was knocked out by a female opponent.

Oh believe me, we'd know about it if she had. It'd be too good a 'gotcha' to let go unnoticed.

@DialSquare I don’t doubt your commitment or anyone else on here. It’s more just an observation that these threads are virtually identical. The comments are just c&p from one thread to another. The same arguments rehearsed day after day.

And why do you think that is Redtrees?

[quote RedtreesRedtrees]@DialSquare I don’t doubt your commitment or anyone else on here. It’s more just an observation that these threads are virtually identical. The comments are just c&p from one thread to another. The same arguments rehearsed day after day.[/quote]
And why is that? 😂😂😂

Tired of
Explaining
Reality to
Fuckwits

Has anyone said otherwise?

Well the statement 'transwomen are women IS saying otherwise, no?