The last two pages are a really weird read.
"JK's saying trans people don't believe in sex..."
Well, no, she was actually saying "sex - the material reality of sex - is an important thing that underpins understanding where the oppression of women comes from. Women have sex-based rights to protect them from this oppression. Therefore defending sex based rights is important."
"Waffle waffle, sex and gender is the same... or is it sex and gender aren't the same... we all believe in sex... except on the other threads where we've said it's an invention of white colonialism... but either way, there aren't really male people on twitter calling women cunts and threatening violence, that's just your foetid imaginations, or if there are, they're nothing to do with trans apart from the trans flag baseball bats... oh fuck off the lot of you..."
I'm still not sure I've discerned an actual argument amidst the waffle.
Mine's quite simple.
Sex is too do with biology. It gets weaponised against us, it's the material basis of our oppression.
Gender (old fashioned social sciences sense, aka sex stereotypes) is the ideological system about appropriate behaviours, dress, separate spheres all the rest of the crap used to prop up the system of oppression.
Gender (new fangled Stonewall sense of internal sense of one's identity) is akin to a belief in eternal souls - a religious belief. I don't have that religious belief. So frankly, it's irrelevant to my political struggle (which is a very real one - nearly 50 years after the equal pay act, I still had to take my then employer to court to get equal pay for equal work).
That's what I'm all about - the practical consequences of real life sexism politically in the real world. Believe in gender unicorns/genderbread people all you want, I don't fucking care. So long as it doesn't impede my political struggle to be treated as an equal human being.