That's not more information, it's just a rehash of the Mail's article.
I've said multiple times on here anyway that I don't agree with this. If schools want to have unisex/mixed sex toilets then it requires investment and designing toilets that are fit for purpose. I don't agree with them simply re designating old style single sex toilets as mixed sex.
But then I've already said this multiple times on this thread and you are willfully ignoring and misrepresenting what I said so I don't know why I'm bothering.
You clearly don't want any sort of discussion nor are bothered by any.of the other issues that surround toilets in schools. The trans gender issue is not the only concern that schools have.
It seems that you want single sex toilets, in the old fashioned style, and that's it. Regardless of the many problems that they result in and regardless of the issues that they create for many girls. You dismiss girl on girl bullying as being not that important because it doesn't involve boys but for girls who are on the receiving end of it it can be devastating. If schools stick with single sex toilets, in the traditional style, then they have to come up with plans that eradicate bullying in the toilets because the fear of that does exactly what the parents in this article are complaining about - it stops girls from using toilets at school, with all of the inherent risks. But it seems that unless the problem involves boys or trans gender issues then you aren't bothered by it.
Why is that?