I’m just giving birth to my friends child because unfortunately they weren’t born with vaginas
No. They cannot conceive.
surro I hear that you have rationalised this to be doing the right and hugely magnanimous thing for 'friends'.
How do you rationalise the harms that taking a baby away from its mother at or shortly after birth causes a baby?
I think this must be hard to hear, but in the world of adoption and fostering it is a very well known syndrome that can commonly bring huge issues through adolescence as the developing child tries to emotionally mature against a backdrop of broken psychological attachment?
A baby knows its mother. It knows its mothers body instinctively, better than the dm herself, as it uses her heartbeat and breathing to help regulate its own erratic breathing after birth, and as a huge source of comfort and further stable attachment. It can smell and taste its mother. Immediately recognise her voice which has been there throughout the development of its sense, and everything that baby is has come from the mother's body.
It is not an egg being hatched, this is a real baby, and its fully aware when its ripped away from its only source of attachment to that point. Its first milk, vital colostrum, and the fourth trimester, also a vital part of its attachment development where all it does is move from inside the layers of muscles and skin, to outside, where its still close to mother's heart beat, skin, breathing, smell, and reassurance.
Not for nothing is skin to skin a profound experience and widely used for preemy babies to help them survive.
Its this kind of depth of knowledge, i.e. reality, that makes surrogacy such an awful proposition. Its creating, deliberately, awful issues. Issues for the baby. Theres no right for anyone to do that. There are enough issues already in the world for babies to grow up through.
Then there's the psychological and physical issues for the DM. These are your babies, that your body is growing. That your frankly, naïvety, seems to be arguing the case for.
This is a much more complex process than the simplistic view you have of it.
Baby suffers, dm suffers (but hopefully has the psychological and physical resilience to overcome), not exactly a win win is it?
The only winners are the people who have bought a baby, also without any insights into the complexities of realities.
Exactly as that picture portrays. Blithe ignorance, happy greedy people got what they wanted.
No surprise indeed that law change is being sought.
People like you surro are handing over womens rights on a plate to men with your attitudes.
I wont apologise if you don't like that we're not all fawning and grateful because you so magnanimously, again, came to bestow and share your huge wisdom and knowledge to us by simply answering some questions (without any curiosity to actually learn anything from anyone else, despite the breadth and depth of knowledge on here, not to mention personal experience).
Its no accident that this is currently law. The baby is bonded to its birth mother.
You can give your baby away to anyone, but doing that doesn't alter what that does to the baby who's mother you indeed are.
Why is this all about the poor menz...again! 
Jeez...this subject couldn't be more about babies and women!