Person in women's shelter boasts about spirting erection, shelter supports 'her'

[SunsetBeetch]

I posted this on the This Never Happens thread, but it's so horrible I think it deserves its own thread.

Canada of course.

Trans women posts about wandering around naked with an erection in a women's shelter(even providing the address of the shelter). They also appear to have mental health issues. Concerned women tweet the shelter. The shelter responds by asking people not to 'spread harmful mistruths' about trans people.

A women's shelter actually putting vulnerable women in danger. This is how far things have gone in Canada.

Please retweet. Women in one of the most unsafe neighbourhoods in Canada are forced to bunk up with an obvious predator. He gets amusement from exposing his male body to vulnerable women. Self ID hurts women. #dtes #vancouver @VancouverPD @VanRapeRelief #gendercritical t.co/GCJCAkGL8Z
by MNHQ to remove the Tweet containing the address of a women's shelter

I have read some of their other tweets. There is nothing, and I mean nothing pleasant about this person.

Well done Canada! A true beacon for progressives.

I know @NotTonightJosephine - every survival instinct screams at me this person is dangerous

I am honestly at a loss for words.

This person is clearly very mentally unwell. However, the world we are now forced to live in is so desperate to appear woke at all costs that it is willing to put that wokeness ahead of concerns about this person's own mental health, and the physical and emotional safety of the biological women being forced to share with this person. But as long as the shelter can virtue signal their wokeness on social media, nothing else matters. Apparently.

Fucking hell.

When people starting saying ‘political correctness has gone mad’ I was still green enough to disagree. Those days are now long gone.

Allowing a mentally ill man with a criminal record and a publicly published history of violent and sexually abusive fantasies to reside in a shelter for vulnerable women is surely negligent to the point of criminality?

How the ever loving fuck did this seem like a good idea to anyone?

Holy fuckity fuck.

I'd rather take my chances on the streets than share a roof with this likes of this person or Muscato. I'm sure I'm not alone. But I expect the shelters feel morally superior that they're being inclusive.

Allowing a mentally ill man with a criminal record and a publicly published history of violent and sexually abusive fantasies to reside in a shelter for vulnerable women is surely negligent to the point of criminality?

Not just allowing him to reside: actively supporting him in posting about his intentional and enjoyed sexually inappropriate and intimidation and exhibitionism using those vulnerable women. And telling women to shut up about it.

We're at the stage now of being encouraged to believe that this kind of behaviour should be tolerated and accepted as part and parcel of the protected identity and also be a protected characteristic.

I understand this is a homeless shelter, rather than a DV refuge, so the publication of the address is not as dangerous as it would otherwise be. That said, this person does not belong in a shelter with vulnerable, hugely disadvantaged women. He needs specialist mental health care.

Truly horrible. Presumably the shelter doesn't want to end up like that other shelter (Vancouver?) and be continually sued for decades by some malicious gaslighter. But it's rendered itself not simply pointless but actively harmful because it's got people like this inside it. Horrific.

The Shelter staff don't seem concerned,
What would it take?

What the.... How can..... Why...... This is just unbelievable! The more I read all these things the more I just cannot believe what I am seeing.

Heinous. But I guess if they don't accept h** they lose their funding - as Vancouver Rape Relief has. Morgane Oger will make sure of it.

Personally, I feel every women's shelter should make a stand against TRAs like Oger and say "NO". Would Canada defund all of them? Could be damaging to women's services in the short term - but women's services will be destroyed anyway, by allowing predatory males in - so...what's the alternative?

A women's shelter is not safe for women if transwomen like Tyler are allowed access - especially when Tyler feels it's appropriate to share the address on social media.

snowbear I think the shelter staff will be running scared. They are probably framing this in their own minds as making the best of a bad situation in order not to set this individual off and praying they just choose to fuck off elsewhere eventually. We know what narcissistic individuals can be like when they don't get their way. Malicious, aggressive, attention-seeking. Law suits, screaming about the literal violence all over social media. And with all this regulatory capture, I'm guessing there's amost zero support around in Canada for a women's organisation that tries to stand up to the bullying.

You're right though, zebra, these services are ruined anyway if they let these individuals in - the very last sort of person vulnerable women should be sharing accommodation with.

I've recently returned from Vancouver. I was there for five days in total. The homelessness and substance issues there are appalling. We saw a serious, separate incident each day we were there. From leaving the airport and driving into the city there were multiple people lying on the pavements or clearly out of control.

The very first day within the space of 15 minutes a very unwell person had entered a restaurant we were in and was screaming abuse at everyone in there. We left promptly only to walk five minutes and my 12 year old dd to be violently barged into and called a "fucking arsehole" as she walked past someone. The next day a man asked me for money then barged me and screamed in my face when I politely refused. Passers by intervened with one of them saying after "they're very loud but usually don't put hands on so don't worry". There were other incidents that I won't bother to go into.

The point I am making is it really does not surprise me that this person is being given a pass by this shelter. From what I have seen of certain areas of Vancouver this person would not stand out. Cannabis is legal there now and the people I spoke to thought it a terrible thing and that homelessness and drug issues there would be exacerbated by this. For context, I live in London and have done for nearly twenty years. I am no shrinking violet but what I saw in Vancouver shocked me.

Weird, Carol. I have family in Vancouver who paint it as some kind of peaceful nirvana. Maybe they're just blissfully unaware.

I’ve always been shocked by the visible poverty and homeless in Vancouver. Like CarolDanvers, I felt very unsafe in some very central areas just around gas town (and I grew up in a big city so also no shrinking violet)

I'm so sorry that your family experienced such a volatile visit to Vancouver (especially your 12yr old, I hope she's ok).

Cannabis is legal there now and the people I spoke to thought it a terrible thing and that homelessness and drug issues there would be exacerbated by this.

Yeah so that's odd conjecture - NEWSFLASH... cocaine, meth, heroin, PCP, fentanyl, bath salts, etc. are society destroyers - cannabis can't logically be lumped in with the aforementioned and conflating them is disingenuous.

Cannabis might have people driving slower, eating more, and being easily amused not eating other people's faces or getting otherwise violent to get their next fix. I seriously doubt the logic that pot smokers are going to be strung out in the streets (unless their Cannabis is laced with something like PCP but that has nothing to do with Cannabis, the added substance would be the issue) or exacerbate negative addict behavior. Cannabis is not physiologically addictive the other substances mentioned are highly physiologically addictive... alcohol is much more dangerous than Cannabis for body and mind.

This laydeeee on the shelter is our new normal. Fucking terrifying degenerate I don't care about their problems - they gave up any possible compassion by logical women the moment they began forcing their fetishes on vulnerable women.

We have to get this sorted out globally or biological women will be subordinated to TW in every arena.

Yeah so that's odd conjecture - NEWSFLASH... cocaine, meth, heroin, PCP, fentanyl, bath salts, etc. are society destroyers - cannabis can't logically be lumped in with the aforementioned and conflating them is disingenuous.

Don't agree with this I am afraid. There's considerable research that supports the theory of cannabis as a gateway drug to harder substances. I don't for one minute think what I saw was all cannabis related but it makes sense that a place where cannabis is legal will attract other types of drug use and antisocial behaviours as well. It's a big part of the picture.

Why Couldn’t the shelter have just said “thank you for pointing out these posts, we are looking into it” ?

At least that would have been consistent with the ~fiction~ Statement that everyone is held to the same standards.

No “transphobia” or worry about the law that they must pretend this person is female. Just hold this person to some standard of decency or they are going to have be transferred to mixed “gender”accommodation.

I have several friends who have been mental health nurses. They all attest to the dangers of cannabis directly linked to psychosis and schizophrenia. It is not harmless.

Long term/heavy use of cannabis has definitely been linked to psychosis.

But I think there are some v strong types of cannabis around these days - far stronger than the giggly-grass, as we called it, I used to dabble with at parties in the late 80s.

Self medicating bipolar disorder with cannabis cannot be a good idea. This Tyler could be seriously dangerous.

I hear ya Carol but IMO alcohol is the real gateway drug.

As an individual that experimented with a whole lot of substances in my 20s/30s I was immersed in the "scene" on the weekends. The alcoholics liked drugs that gave them an intensified alcohol-esque feeling (heroin - melting through the Earth is a common descriptor) without the calories. Meth users tended to seek out other speedy highs like cocaine et al. Cannabis could never foot that bill. Most smoked Cannabis to "come down" so they could sleep and/or deal with nausea as well as body aches from hard substances. It was/is medicinal for many addicts as well as those suffering from chronic pain, cancer, gastro issues, endometriosis, hernias, etc.

The cannabis users I knew (and know today) like an occasional (or no) cocktails and are hella productive (pretty much all professionals and my dad who is a cancer patient). The cocaine, meth, etc. users I used to know are all trying to get clean as their bodies disintegrate along with the alcoholics - they are getting medical marijuana Rx instead of methodone et al to deal with DTs and other withdrawal symptoms.

I mostly see it as an alternative to alcohol for relaxation as well as medicine.