Shocking behaviour towards lesbians at Leeds 'pride' today

[CaptainKirksSpookyghost]

Thread 2

Previous thread here:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3656142-Shocking-behaviour-towards-lesbians-at-Leeds-pride-today

Here you go Early mirandayardley.com/en/jonathan-yaniv-is-a-predator/

datun you’re faux naivety isn’t fooling anyone.

spartacus post ended with this:

That is why they are so cheerful when they respond, it has given them the hard on which they desired.

I didn’t see any mention of JYs paedophilic behaviour within the pink news story, it was focused on the waxing case.

I didn’t see LGBT people supporting JY.

I haven’t seen pink news or any LGBT organisation opening condone pedophilia.

I’m currently reasesrching peter thatchell, is it the 1997 guardian letter you’re referring to? Have I found the right person?

You might have to actually read something that isn't pink news sanctioned, are you able to do that?

Early

Wasn’t it your view that 120+ people shouting “NO T**FS AT PRIDE” at 13 women was like... no big deal? You were more critical of the women’s actions and felt they asked for it.

See, the comments here really are no big deal. I got called a man once - who cares? Someone called me “dishonest” on the first thread. I told them where to go.

We are not 120 people yelling at you. And yet, this discourse is behind the pale. You want to call us bigots!

Because... women here “think they can be rude to anyone.”

datun - of course - I forgot. That's why they are silent on all the other questionable people mentioned on this thread i suppose.

I didn’t see LGBT people supporting JY.

People no, but organizations yes.... has the penny dropped yet.... this isn't about individual people.....

didn’t see any mention of JYs paedophilic behaviour within the pink news story

Because they see nothing wrong with it.

The cogs are broken but are they at least slightly turning ?

See, the comments here really are no big deal. I got called a man once - who cares? Someone called me “dishonest” on the first thread. I told them where to go

Er..... there's a world of difference between being called it once and repeatedly being called it as an insult to discredit your opinion,

So no LGBT group is supporting this paedophile infiltration agenda.

Excepting Pink News (PinkNews – Gay news, reviews and comment from the world's most read lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans news service) support the known paedophile Jonathan Yaniv.

And Peter Tatchell who thinks nine-year-olds enjoys sex with adults, was leading pride in Brighton (Pride - Expressing solidarity among members of the LGBT community.)

I’m currently reasesrching peter thatchell, is it the 1997 guardian letter you’re referring to? Have I found the right person?

This section of his wikipedia page might be of interest.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tatchell#Age_of_consent_laws

Because they see nothing wrong with it

Did I say I see nothing wrong with it?
We're talking about Pride though.
Was JY there? No, I don't think was?
Now it's back to look what this person did though.

Did I say I see nothing wrong with it?

I wasn't talking to you, or about you.

I was talking about a magazine, unless you are the editor of pink news, this has nothing to do with you.

Basic reading comprehension can help Roses, you've made so many mistakes by misunderstanding simple posts.

datun you’re faux naivety isn’t fooling anyone.

Says the person who has no idea about Peter Tatchell, Jonathan Yaniv. Despite sitting on these boards where there have been dozens of threads about them.

Incidentally, my list includes two people who advised the government, a person who is on the Stonewall advisory board, our biggest children's charity, a Students union advisor, A mainstream media journalist and umpteen well-known transactivists. Not random people.

This list I mean:

Except of course, us talking relentlessly about maps, nomaps Yaniv, Bradley and their incest rape, Fae and campaign to lower the age of extreme porn participants, the other Faye saying suck dick, get tits early, drag queen storytime, Desmond is amazing, Lactatia, the sweets and puppies at pride, promoted by mermaids, the furries, bronys, nappy fetishists and incarcerated rapers of children."

I think I'll just keep adding to this list.

Amy Challoner, engaged to a self-confessed paedophile.

Jonathan Yaniv, tampon fetish wrt 10-year-olds.

David Thomas, mainstream media, salivating over his pre pubescent girl breasts.

The NSPCC not seeing anything wrong with Bergdorf encouraging minors to contact them privately online.

The NSPCC not seeing anything wrong with a rubber clad perv wanking in their office.

Peter Tachell and his nine year olds can enjoy Sex.

Him and Stephen Fry wanting to give masterbation lessons to children

Oh, and the man who lead Brighton pride

What has JY got to do with Pride though?

Right I'm off to lunch. Tuna sandwich

What has JY got to do with Pride though?

Quick change the subject!!!!!

I see RosesAndRaindrops is doing her usual, jump on something not even directed at her at and just keep on an on and on about it, plus the usual twisting, deflecting and ignoring. It's patently obvious that the only people who are wrong in Rose's eyes are those lesbians who protested for their rights and the legal definition of lesbians at Pride and those on this thread who support the protesters.

I do hope RosesAndRaindrops, EarlyWalker and Bespin are and will be as supportive of Transmen who identify as gay men and equally condemning of gay men who want to uphold the legal definition of their same sex attraction.

The comments on the Pink news article Early, did it give you the idea that the organisation and the people are at odds, that's because it's true, the basic man on the street doesn't feel represented by pink news in their support of a peadophile.

Dodgy LGBT organisation, and the average person, be they straight, gay or trans are seeing through it.

.....The organisation isn't representative of the community....

But they are lobbying the government to change laws.

Was just wanting to make it clear that I do see something wrong with it.

We're talking about Pride though.
Was JY there? No, I don't think was?
So none of it matters. Nothing is relevant unless it happened at Leeds Pride 2019 as was recorded as such.
I see.
Actually, no - I don't.

Quick change the subject!!!!!

I'm not, somebody else brought JY up not me.

TRA's ideology doesn't represent your average transgender person, it represents those like Yaniv and Pink news.

By listing LGBT pedophiles shows exactly where your heads at.

Lesbians can do no wrong?

But you’re happy to lump them in as pedophile enablers.

There is a huge difference between embracing pedophiles, People joining in with MAP t-shirts and map floats, and what you are saying.

I have no doubt whatsoever that many organisations are guilty of covering up/enabling pedophilia. The Catholic Church, the bbc, the music industry, hospitals, Westminster, mosques etc have all done it and I’m sure LGBT organisations have been guilty too.

But we all know all too well how the LGBT scene has faught to distance itself from the once huge amounts of people comparing them to pedophiles.

To now say that pedophiles were openly there within LGBT people representing themselves as MAPS and that they accepted them when there’s no evidence? Doesn’t sit right.

Oh and the cries of ‘lesbians don’t have penis’ is clearly a dig at all transgender woman, not just the TRA. It is not the words, the words make sense, it is the intent.