Here's my follow-up:
My original complaint concerned Today programme reporter and editor Dave McMullan, who tweeted on July 16 at 1.38pm: "I will add that I’ve never put any trans woman on alongside some horrifc TERF. I vetoed it , in fact. Partly just instinct but also cos I didn’t quite understand what was going on with the anti-trans at the time. I’m now reasonably good at the GRA consultation"
I pointed out that Mr McMullan had demonstrated clear bias in vetoing balanced views on his programmes, and admitted that he did so without actually bothering to understand the issue and simply labelling biological women's legitimate concerns as 'anti-trans'. This is utterly unacceptable, given the legitimate concerns of actual women and girls over the threats to their privacy, safety and dignity.
Your response confirmed he'd been spoken to, which is fair. But also stated "We should emphasise that the suggestion that certain categories of guest have not appeared on the Today programme is incorrect."
This is (a) partly true but (b) not answering what I actually said. I didn't say the viewpoints never appeared, but that the trans viewpoint was frequently aired with no gender-critical feminist perspective on the discussion. Two recent examples: 19-Oct-18, a debate on the GRA consultation on Today featuring ONLY a transman and a transwoman; no women.
Sat 29-Dec-18: Interview with Travis Alabanza, on his right to use women's changing rooms and other private spaces. No to minimal challenge by the presenter, absolutely no opposing views from women on why women's spaces exist and are closed to biological males.
If a gender-critical viewpoint has ever been aired on Today without the trans equivalent I would welcome examples.
A senior employee of yours has admitted he vetoed views he did not like on his programme, and from the language he used, has done so repeatedly. Coverage I have heard supports this. This is what I would like you to respond to before I escalate to Ofcom.