I'm confused over whether I've mis-gendered now bearing in mind JY seems to present in both ways
Everard I'm taking the line that the court record shows that at the time of the incident JY was still using male names themselves and at times was presenting as male and didn't subsequently make changes until after the event.
Thus its highly relevant to the case to refer to JY as male at the time, and therefore suggesting there is 'misgendering' after the fact is simply a smoke and mirrors way to try and discredit the defendant and deflect from the events as they happened.
In the context of this case I think it's fair to use male pronouns for that reason.
In other situations the justification to do so might not be as strong and might be viewed as disrespectful but the entire point is that this looks like opportunism and has malicious intent if you understand what JY gender identity was at the time as it changes the context of events and distorts the reality of that moment.
You can't change your gender identity and then use that to effectively retrospectively to go after people you dislike for not respecting your gender identity which they couldn't have known and you didn't have at the time.